The product of fusing two hydrogen atoms together would not be helium (the next element on the Periodic Table). The production of Helium would require at least four hydrogen atoms, with only a tiny amount of energy left over to be released, and we all know that stars are big time ‘wasters’ of energy. This leads me to draw the conclusion that there must be unknown ‘weird atoms’ that lie between hydrogen and helium and that are the products of fusion, and which must be stable enough to undergo repeated fusion events before one kilogram of hydrogen becomes perhaps a few grams of helium (with energy in the amount of quadrillions of BTU being released during the process).

I would like to create an element a little denser than Helium, some weird atom that I can use to produce a ball that I can then hang in space and have it float in mid-air so that I can perform more of my weird experiments to test the predictions of the Unified Field Theory.

Obviously I will need a fusion reactor to create these elements since creating them directly would consume enormous amounts of energy, and that energy is already available in conveniently shrink wrapped pouches (in the form of hydrogen or helium or other atoms).

According to the Unified Field Theory of Gravitation, space can be warped using a magnetic field, resulting in the contraction of space, causing increasing density in a hydrogen or helium atom, which then results in a relativistic temperature increase as the density increases, which then becomes the spark which creates the world’s very first fusion reactor. (Fission reactors already exist, and produce radioactive waste, and is a different process altogether). Since the products of fusion are just energy and a new atom (the result of fusing two atoms together), the energy produced could be used to power a toaster, thus solving the ‘global warming’ problem, while at the same time I should be able to produce some ‘weird atoms’ that I can then use in my anti-gravity experiments.

We will assume that I was able to produce a weird atom that was a little denser than either hydrogen or helium, and that I was then able to park about twenty or thirty feet off the ground and have it float in mid-air. I would then be able to test one of the predictions of the Unified Field Theory, which states that objects that rise in a gravitational field decelerate and then stop, while objects that fall in a gravitational field accelerate and then abruptly stop. Now most of the time we see objects stopping quite abruptly when they hit the ground because the ‘atomic wave function’ of that object is located somewhere below the surface of the earth, and therefore, since falling in a gravitational field involves lining up in queue, and waiting your turn to fall, and given all the material already in line and trying to fall downwards in the field, most objects never get a chance to abruptly stop when they reach the spot in the energy field which is the exact match for the atomic density of that object.

When a falling accelerating object reaches its wave state in the gravitational field, and abruptly stops, does it experience ‘G-Forces’. My hypothesis is that, no, it does not. Just as rising object decelerates and then simply stops so, too, would a falling object accelerate and then simply stop.