A Unified Field Theory
The Unified Atom
INDEX
Acceleration, Gravitation, and the Equivalence Principle. Contradicting Einstein (again)
Background link : G-Forces.
According to Einstein, if he were to place you in space-craft accelerating through a space at a certain rate, or if he were to place that space-craft on the surface of the earth, and if you had no windows to let you look out and see what was happening to you, you would not be able to tell if the downward force you were feeling was being caused by gravity (the space-ship was stationary and sitting on the surface of the earth) or if the downward force was being caused by acceleration (you were accelerating at a certain rate through a space). In a similar way, if you are accelerating upwards in an elevator, you feel extra G-Forces pulling you downward, or if you are sitting on a seat in a train or car and the train or car accelerates, you feel yourself pulled back in your seat by G-Forces. Therefore, Einstein states, acceleration and gravitation are ‘equivalent’.
Certain observations I have had the opportunity to make over the years have convinced me that G-Forces can be eliminated, and so therefore Einstein’s argument must be incorrect. What I would suggest is that it could be true that acceleration in a car or a train or on a rocket ship moving through space would be equivalent to the force of gravitation exerted upon an object sitting upon the surface of the earth. This is correct. The reason for this equivalence is the differential that exists between the ‘atomic wave function’ of an object resting upon the surface of the earth and its ‘orbital position’ which exists somewhere down below the surface of the earth. Similarly there exists a differential between the atomic wave function of a human accelerated in either an elevator, rocket, or inside a car or a train. The rate at which the energetic density of these different objects increases is not equal and therefore they do not accelerate at the same speed, which then creates these G-Forces.
An object being accelerated in a gravitational field (it is in free fall) experiences no G-Forces whatsoever. It is weightless at is accelerates. An object which is at its correct position in a gravitational field is also ‘weightless’ and experiences no G-Forces (for example, a weather balloon floats at a certain position in the gravitational field because it is weightless…a piece of iron would also float and become weightless if it could be positioned at exactly that position within the gravitational field somewhere below the surface of the earth where the wave function of the energy field is exactly equivalent to the atomic wave function of iron).
Therefore we could assume that under conditions of ‘ideal acceleration’ where there is no differential existing in the atomic wave function of the objects increasing in density (gaining ‘momentum’ and thus ‘accelerating’) an object experiencing such acceleration should not experience ‘G-Forces’, but rather should become weightless as it accelerates.
We should consider a human to have a composite wave function given the different atomic components that make up the human body, and so therefore ‘ideal acceleration’ would probably never occur, and we would hope to minimize G-Forces. However, objects falling in a gravitational field all accelerate at the same rate (consider the hammer and the feather dropped upon the moon, which hit the surface at the same time). With this thought in mind, I entertain the possibility of overcoming G-Forces completely, by creating a ‘total field’ (encasing my space-craft within a surrounding magnetic field so that a composite object becomes like a single object within this field, increasing in density in harmony with the increasing density of the surrounding field).
In the model above we see energy being introduced into a closed energy system from below, and then propagating through the system from a single direction (from the bottom up). We could assume that this distribution does not occur for an object in free fall, accelerating through a gravitational field and experiencing no G-Forces (weightless acceleration). Therefore my hypothesis would be that if we were to accelerated a single field (we would unify the disparate fields using a magnetic envelope) then it should be possible to eliminate the differential which creates G-Forces and that this could be the proper method to employ to achieve weightless acceleration.
INDEX
The Unified Field Theory of Gravitation