According to Einstein's classical interpretation of the principle of relativity, the geometry of the spatial field is fixed and invariant. The distance between any two points is a fixed constant and only the clock is relative. What this means is that both bosons (quanta of energy) and fermions (quanta of mass) follow a single path through the field. However, because the clock is relative, the time is takes to travel between two points in space is a variable quantity which is dependant upon momentum. Consider the example of two identical twins. One travels a distance of one million light years at an extremely high velocity, and because the clock slows down at such high velocities, the trip seems to take a few months. However because the first twin was traveling through a spatial field with a single invariant path, it was required that the twin cover one million light years and take one million years to do so, since every fermion must follow the boson path (one million light years), and so when the identical twin returned to earth he discovered that two million years had passed and his identical twin had become a two million year old fossil.

There are a number of unexplained scientific anomalies which all share one common feature. They all involve an anomalous interpretation of spatial geometry. For several decades quasars which are apparently several billion light years distant have been found located at the center of galaxies only a few hundred million light years distant (as measured by the red shift of electromagnetic radiation, which increases with distance). There is an anomalous red shift present in galaxies which suggests that the rotational curve of galaxies does not conform to expectations (the curve is flat, which implies that the center of galaxies do not rotate more rapidly than the outer edge). The two Pioneer spacecraft have been decelerating at a rate that causes them to fall behind by about 400,000 kilometers per year (mathematically the rate of deceleration is equivalent to Hubble's constant, a measure of the red shift).

Einstein's mathematical equations are broken. For this reason it is required that the evidence be ignored and imaginary evidence be concocted, such as the invisible ‘dark matter of the universe' (drop some dark matter into the universe and then the equations will once again work properly). This approach requires that we ignore the evidence, or regard the evidence as faulty, and instead we must cling to our mathematical equations, which is equivalent to clinging to our normal perceptions of spatial geometry, and this approach requires the concoction of imaginary evidence (such as the invisible ‘dark matter' of the universe, which, if found, would validate our previous assumptions and salvage the wreckage of our currently prevailing mathematical equations and the anthropocentric world view which underlies such equations).

According to the Unified Field Theory, it is our anthropocentric conception of spatial geometry which is at fault, and the evidence that we have is reliable (only our rejection of the evidence is untrustworthy).

It has been suggested that the rate of deceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft (which is mathematically equivalent to Hubble's constant) is a meaningless coincidence. Let's assume that once again this rejection of the evidence is just an anthropocentric projection, and that the evidence is meaningful. What this suggests is that momentum is relative and that as the spacecraft are decelerating, the speed of light is increasing (it would require ‘more momentum' for the spacecraft to maintain a constant velocity through the field, which implies that the maximum potential velocity of the two spacecraft must be increasing).

What this suggests is that there is no fixed path through the spatial field, and that the fermion path (a mass of matter) and the boson path (a quanta of energy) are inversely related to one another.





The following article discusses the detection of a high red shift quasar at the center of a nearby low red shift galaxy. Discovery Poses Cosmic Puzzle: Can A 'Distant' Quasar Lie Within A Nearby Galaxy?. "How could a galaxy 300 million light years away contain a stellar object several billion light years away?"





When a fermion is dropped into a gravitational field, it accelerates, and the rate of acceleration increases as the field strength increases (a fermion dropped into the field of the moon accelerates at a slower rate than a fermion dropped into the field of Jupiter). What this implies is that as the field strength increases the fermion path length decreases, while the quasar anomaly suggests that as field strength increases the boson path length increases. An inverse path length is implied by these two anomalous observations, which are consistent with the evidence presented by the Pioneer anomaly. What this implies is that spatial geometry is not fixed and invariant, as required by Einstein's interpretation of the principle of relativity, but rather it is geometry itself which is relative, and the path length of both fermions and bosons are inversely related to one another.





As field strength increases, the boson path length increases (while the fermion path length decreases). We can see further evidence that is true if we consider the example of the behavior of ionized fermions accelerated in a particle accelerator. The fermion follows a spiral path and constantly emits radiation, which implies a loss of momentum energy. The fact that a fermion never travels ‘faster than the speed of light' (therefore every fermion must follow the boson path) becomes a self fulfilling prophecy, for the fermion is ionized (stripped of electrons it becomes a charge particle, and therefore in the powerful electromagnetic field of the particle accelerator it is bound to the boson path). Therefore the fermion follows a spiral path (which resembles the oscillating boson path) while at the same time the fermion must constantly lose momentum in the particle accelerator so as to remain on the boson path. Both the spiral path and the emission of this excess momentum (synchotron raditation) can be interpreted as evidence to support inverse paths through the field of both bosons and fermions. (As the charged fermion is forced onto the boson path it is forced to emit excess momentum energy in order to ‘decelerate' and remain on the slower boson path. Both the spiral path and this constant emission of electromagnetic radiation can be interpreted as further evidence for the conflict between the boson and the inversely related fermion path through the spatial field).

It follows from this observation that if a boson path length increases as the surrounding field strength increases, then it must also be true that a boson path length increases as the energy of the boson wave itself increases (this being the result of the equivalence between external field strength and the inertial momentum of the boson wave itself...we can see a similar equivalence in that a fermion with a certain velocity (inertia) exhibits behavior equivalent to a boson within a certain field, such as equivalent time dilation effects for a fermion which is moving at a certain velocity and a fermion within an equivalent gravitational field, as well as equivalent red shift effects).

We can see further evidence that this equivalence between field and inertial effects applies to bosons as well as fermions when we consider that a high energy boson behaves similarly to a boson within a high energy field (the result is a relative deceleration as field strength or inertial momentum increases, and the opposite is true when field strength or momentum decreases, resulting in a relative increase in boson acceleration). It would seem that very high energy bosons follow a longer path through the field than lower energy bosons.

13 more things: MAGIC results "In 2005, researchers at the MAGIC gamma-ray telescope on La Palma in the Canary Islands were studying gamma-ray bursts emitted by the black hole in the center of the Markarian 501 galaxy, half a billion light years away. The burst's high-energy gamma rays arrived at the telescope 4 minutes later than the lower-energy rays. Both parts of the spectrum should have been emitted at the same time. So is the time lag due to the high-energy radiation traveling slower through space? That wouldn't make sense: it would contravene one of the central tenets of special relativity. According to Einstein, all electromagnetic radiation always travels through vacuum at the cosmic speed limit the speed of light. The energy of the radiation should be absolutely irrelevant."

Consideration of this evidence leads me to propose a new design for particle accelerators. According to this analysis, current particle accelerators force fermions onto the boson path (resulting in a spiral path through the powerful magnetic field, since the fermion is ‘ionized' and thus becomes a charged particle, where the momentum energy is so great that E=P, and the mass of the fermion (MC2) becomes almost irrelevant). There are those who would argue that the path of a fermion through a particle accelerator justifies the assumptions made by Einstein, in that every fermion follows the boson path (it never travels ‘faster than the speed of light') but the argument being made here is that this is a self fulfilling prophecy in that every charged fermion is forced onto the boson path. It therefore follows from this that it must be explained why it is that fermions follow a spiral path and why a fermion is required to release so much momentum energy in a particle accelerator in order to remain on this path, for we make the assumption here that both the spiral path (emulating the boson path) and the emission of this radiation (loss of momentum) are not coincidental.

We make the assumption that the emission of this excess momentum energy (synchotron radiation) is quantized, which implies that it is pulsed. It therefore logically follows from this that a fermion should be accelerated by a pulsed field (the fermion would not be forced onto the boson path, but rather it would be accelerated by pulsed infusions of momentum and then immediately released from the boson path before the emission of excess momentum energy is required).





If it is true that it is the geometry of the spatial field that is relative (and not some fourth dimensional clock) then it follows from this that the correct interpretation of the principle of relativity is that as momentum energy increases the distance between two points collapses, and as the momentum energy reaches a critical point, this collapse of field geometry no longer resembles a linear function, but rather the collapse becomes an exponential function. What this means is that no motion of a fermion can occur in zero time, but rather a distance covered generates some time, even if that time is only a fraction of some picosecond.





We can imagine a new design of a linear particle accelerator with the magnetic coils spaced out to mimic this exponential function. The distance between each coil (which will attract the charged fermion and impart momentum energy through a pull) increases in direct relationship to this exponential collapse in distance (the fermion covers the distance between each coil in equivalent time). The impartation of momentum energy is pulsed (accelerating the fermion and then releasing the fermion from the magnetic field, thus allowing the charged fermion to continue upon the fermion path, rather than being forced onto the boson path by a continuously present magnetic field). We can imagine the design of this particle accelerator consisting of nanotubes, and given the linear design we eliminate the need for steering magnetic fields. A fermion is therefore free to follow the true fermion path is not required to spiral through the field (like a big boson) and is also not required to emit synchotron radiation in order to lose momentum and remain on the boson path..