A Unified Field Theory

A summary of the Unified Field Theory

INDEX

### Theoretical Description of an 'Anti-Gravity' Device

This morning I was plagued by this nagging feeling that was telling me that creating a flying vehicle (a so called ‘anti=gravity' device) was a trivial problem, and for some reason the solution to what should be a very simple and straight forward problem was eluding me, for I was just not seeing the obvious. This feeling of conviction was so strong that I made up my mind that if this was true then this morning I would describe the theoretical foundations of the world's very first method of ‘electromagnetic anti=gravitational propulsion' as a means of validating the Unified Field Theory. The whole process just took a couple of hours and involved pulling things together into a coherent and sensible theoretical framework.

Now one of the problems with constructing such a simple device is that such a device would probably cost a fortune using today's backwards technology, assuming that it could even be done. The problem here is that we require an energy source that might not be available. This then becomes a chicken and egg type problem (catch 22). It is required that we understand how to transfer momentum directly from one momentum field to another momentum field if we are to tap into the virtually limitless energy supply that would make the construction of vehicles employing this new form of propulsion a very trivial design problem. However to achieve this we would need the Unified Field Theory, so that we would have the energy required to validate the Unified Field Theory, and we don't have that energy supply available right now because we don't have the Unified Field Theory because we don't have the energy required to validate the Unified Field Theory (etc., etc., and so and so on).

Fortunately it turns out that many of the experiments required to validate the Unified Field Theory have already been completed and all that remains now is to understand the results of these anomalous experiments correctly.

In the image illustrates my proposal. A floating ship shown in blue, is hovering in mid-air, much to the astonishment of the shocked onlooker on the ground below.

You can follow this link to watch the video of the famous anti-gravitational floating frog. What happened is that a frog was enclosed within a chamber and then an electromagnetic field was formed which created a small pocket of zero gravity. The frog can then be seen floating around much like an astronaut in a space capsule traveling to the moon. We can see here that it is possible to use electromagnetism to create an ‘anti-gravitational' effect, so the question as to whether or not such a thing is possible has been rendered irrelevant, for it is quite clear that it is possible, for it has already been done..

What is missing here is the correct theoretical explanation for this phenomenon. I plan to sketch out the theoretical basis for an anti-gravitational device, and then it would be a simple matter to test whether or not my hypothesis is correct by constructing such a device to see if it does indeed work exactly as predicted by my theory.

The image above is a composite rendering showing the Smith Hydrogen cloud which is currently heading towards an impact with our Milky Way Galaxy. This cloud contains enough hydrogen to make one million stars and has been wandering about in the emptiness of space for a very long time before its upcoming encounter with our galaxy (in approximately fifty thousand years from now).

Now over the course of hundreds of millions or even billions of years the Smith Hydrogen Cloud has never formed even so much as one star, even though it possesses such an enormous ‘gravitational mass' that it has the ability to produce millions of stars, or perhaps one single very large black hole. In the image above we can see why this would not happen. On the left we see the Smith Hydrogen cloud atoms, approaching one another, and then instead of forming a big lump (a ‘gravitational mass') those atoms and molecules are bouncing off of each other like ping pong balls, and it is pretty hard to start clumping together to form a ‘gravitational mass' in this manner. On the right we can see that some of those atoms were cooled to absolute zero, and the effect is similar to a loss of repulsive charge, and finally those atoms were able to clump together, forming a Bose Einstein condensate, which, while it is one big clump, is not quite the same thing as a gravitational mass. We can also see that as the temperature increases hot gas expands, for those hydrogen atoms need their space, and they need more space the further their temperature moves above absolute zero.

The evidence suggests that Einstein's matter based theory of gravitation cannot be correct and that it cannot be the case that matter possesses some inherent ‘attractive force' in relation to other matter. Something is obviously missing in out theory of gravitation, and that missing something turns out to be the electromagnetic field. The image above was taken by the Spitzer telescope, and it shows an electromagnetic tornado in outer space in the process of forming a new star. (Visit the webpage ‘Space Tornado' to read more about this image). It would appear that all gravitational bodies are originally formed by an electromagnetic tornado in that the rotation of such bodies is just the residual conserved angular momentum contributed by the whirling tornado that first created these bodies.

An unexplained equivalence is known to exist between a ‘magnetic field' (on the left) and a ‘gravitational field' (on the right). Both fields obey the Inverse Square Law (the field strength is strongest at the center of the field and then declines in strength according to the inverse square of the distance from the field center (2 times the distance, 1/4 the field strength, 3 times distant, 1/9 field strength, and so on). The graph plotting the warped momentum path around both fields is identical in that the curved path followed by an object falling into a magnetic field is identical to the curved path followed by an object falling into a gravitational field.

We can be quite certain that once the electromagnetic field created the gravitational body out of this vortex seen above, the electromagnetic field did not disappear, but it still remains on the scene, hiding in the background. We know this is true because we routinely use ‘gravitational field energy' to power our coffee pots and toasters and light bulbs. We use such primitive devices as the Hoover Dam in a sort of ‘man in the middle strategy' to convert ‘gravitational field energy' into electrical current, by causing water to gain momentum by falling down through the gravitational field, until it spins a rotor which then powers an electromagnetic turbine generator. We have therefore demonstrated that the gravitational field is not a ‘matter based field' but rather the gravitational field is an energy field. In this way we demonstrate that the field is a unified field, for it is possible to go from gravitational field energy to electrical current and then on to heat or light or back once again to momentum, and in this way we demonstrate that there is nothing special or unique about this gravitational field energy, for it is part of the Universal Energy Cycle.

We know that you cannot get something for nothing, and given that the Hoover Dam is constantly outputting a steady stream of electrical power, that energy must be extracted from the gravitational energy field. We know that whenever energy is transferred via the mechanism of this ‘three dimensional warped space field' the result is always expressed in the form of a change in momentum (examples of this include the fly by maneuver, which accelerates space craft, or the tidal interaction which transfers momentum to the moon and increases its orbital height by about 3 centimeters every year, and of course, momentum is transferred through moving water in the Hoover Dam). In this way we can see that what we call ‘the gravitational field' is actually a momentum field, which is to say that it is an energy field, for momentum is a description of an energy state. This is one more equivalence found to exist between a gravitational field and an electromagnetic field for it is also understood that an electromagnetic field is a carrier of momentum (the photoelectric effect being one example among others).

Given that you cannot get something for nothing it just logically follows that the Hoover Dam generates electrical energy by converting the energy in the earth's momentum field into electricity, while at the same time reducing the earth's momentum. (There is no need for concern here. We will not spiral into the sun because of the Unified Field Theory, for the sun transfers about 3 centimeters worth of extra orbital energy to the earth every year through a tidal interaction, an amount of energy that dwarfs human energy consumption).

If we drop a hammer and a feather onto the surface of several moons, of increasing size, the hammer and the feather will experience an increasing rate of acceleration as they drop through the field, and both the hammer and the feather will impact the surface of the moons at exactly the same time.

The aggregate mass of the objects bears no relationship to the speed with which they will be in motion through a gravitational field. You could drop an elephant and a hammer and a feather and the butt end of that elephant would impact the surface of the moon at exactly the same precise moment as both the hammer and the feather make impact. The rate of acceleration of any mass moving through the field is a fixed constant. From this observation we draw the conclusion that it is not actually the aggregate mass that is moving through the field but rather it is the tiny jigsaw puzzle pieces that make up matter that must be moving through the field. In particle physics these tiny pieces of matter are called ‘quarks', and it must be true that the momentum field interprets each elementary particle of matter as though it represented a fixed and invariant quantity of momentum energy (which is to say that E-MC2, for what we call ‘mass' is interpreted by the momentum field as a fixed quantity of momentum energy). The fixed rate of acceleration experienced by any mass moving through the field suggests that it is the individual particles of matter which are moving through the field and that they navigate the field as though they remained independent of the aggregate mass.

Let's assume that we were to drop a hammer. We impart no momentum to the hammer. We do not throw the hammer. We simply release the hammer. We could then assume that the only momentum possessed by the hammer would be the inherent fixed and invariant momentum represented by the quarks that make up the hammer. We could call this the minimum momentum, or the momentum ground state. This is represented in the image above by the grey circle. A momentum field has a directional component, and we could think of the momentum field of a particle of matter having properties similar to that of a hypothetical magnetic monopole. At the ground state the magnetic moment of the quark is lined up with the field lines of the surrounding momentum field. At the same time two more highly energetic quarks are following a path which ignores the field lines of the surrounding field. When a quark is energetic enough to resist alignment of the magnetic moment with the field lines of the surrounding momentum field then we could say that the quark was in orbit around the gravitating body, and its magnetic moment remained fixed and pointing in one direction. We could also imagine a less energetic quark whose magnetic moment is slowly pulled to match the orientation of the surrounding field, causing the quark to follow a curved path ending in impact with the surface of the gravitating body, at which time it loses the little extra energy that it had upon impact and enters into the ground state. The momentum energy of this quark was inadequate to maintain orbit at this position in the field, and therefore its magnetic moment is pulled in the direction of its correct orbital energy level which lies somewhere down below the surface of the earth (the closer you get to the center of the field the more rapid the intrinsic orbit becomes).

Once a quark reaches the surface of the gravitating body, it still possesses conserved momentum (since it would appear that to have mass is to possess a fixed and invariant quantity of conserved momentum). Therefore even though further progress is impeded by a debris field the quark continues to attempt to move through the field, and it is this constant attempt to maintain motion which is then interpreted as ‘the gravitational force field'. This force field can be reinterpreted as being nothing more than the effect of conserved momentum. If you are sitting in a chair when you are reading this, you can feel yourself sinking down into the cushion of that chair, and I am suggesting that the reason you feel this ‘force' is that you are in ‘virtual motion', and in a certain sense you are still ‘coasting through space and following the curved lines of that spacetime.' You are unable to make any progress because there is chair blocking your path.

If you were to jump off a cliff you would immediately pick up where you left off and promptly begin coasting through that space time, while at the same time experiencing zero g-forces, until such a time as you impacted the bottom of the ravine under that cliff, at which time those ‘g-forces' would suddenly become a concern for you once again. You only feel 'g-forces' when you are not in motion (when there is no debris field blocking your path...in effect the 'g-force' is just you, with your conserved momentum, attempting to push your way through a blockade).

This explanation of the so called 'gravitational force' makes sense, for the aggregate mass is unimportant so long as you remain in motion and are coasting through the warped paths of that spacetime, but it seems that once you impact the surface of the gravitating body, suddenly your aggregate mass becomes an important factor. In the image above we represent sedimentation, with the heaviest particles with the largest aggregate mass settling to the bottom and the lightest particles settling out at the top, all organized into a nice neat sorted sedimentary pile. This is an effect which cannot be explained by means of ‘conserved momentum' or ‘fixed and invariant momentum' which is inherent to some elementary quark, for this phenomenon invokes the aggregate mass.

It is at this point that suddenly that electromagnetic field that is lurking in the background becomes relevant. Let us suppose that this sediment is sitting upon bedrock. The net effect is to create a local field. Now we know that all fields must be arranged according to the Inverse Square Law, and it would seem that this means heavier, and thus ‘more energetic' particles at the bottom of the local field with lighter, and thus ‘less energetically dense' particles at the top of the field, all arranged properly the way a local field should be arranged if it is to obey the requirements of a proper electromagnetically sorted field.

We can see clear examples of this process of ‘sedimentation' working in both directions, pushing up what needs to be pushed up while pulling down what needs to be pulled down (which implies a change in the direction of the magnetic moment of the quarks composing the aggregate matter). In the example above we can see iron falling down in the field, and accelerating as it drops, and on the right, in light blue, we can see hydrogen or helium rising up in the field and decelerating at it rises (you can consider the example of a weather balloon which possesses a fixed and invariant quantity of momentum, such that the instant you release that weather balloon it instantly achieves full velocity, minus any air resistance, and begins to rocket upwards in the field and then gradually it begins to slow down until finally it coasts to a full stop and then parks at a particle position high in the field).

What these observations suggest is that an aggregate mass of matter possesses a property very similar to that of a charged particle, and the resulting charge can either be repulsive or attractive, depending on the position of the aggregate matter within the field. The mass of matter will move through the field at a fixed and invariant rate, which is determined by the fixed and invariant quantity of momentum encapsulated in the elementary particles (the quarks) combined additively with any extra field energy stored in the momentum field surrounding all masses of matter, and it would appear that the function of this ‘charge phenomenon', which is a property of the aggregate mass, is to orient the magnetic moment of the momentum field in a particular direction.

Therefore, we can see that hydrogen or helium belong at the very top of the field, this position in the field being determined by the total energetic density (the aggregate mass) while you belong somewhere in the field located below the visible surface of the earth, which is why you are constantly being ‘sorted' in such a way as to cause you to move to the correct position in the field, somewhere down below the surface of the earth. For this reason the magnetic moment of your quarks will be pointing down, while the magnetic moment of hydrogen will be pointing in the opposite direction (up) which will then cause hydrogen or helium to fall up instead of falling down. The function of this charge phenomenon is to orient the magnetic moment of the momentum field in the correct direction, and this charge phenomenon also determines proper field placement, as determined by the inverse square law for a properly arranged energy field, and this property, being a quantity of total energy, is dependant upon the aggregate total mass.

You can see then that as far as the electromagnetic momentum field is concerned, E really does equal MC squared, for your mass is being rigidly interpreted as both a fixed quantity of momentum and as an energetic density which requires sorting within the gravitational field created by this process of having an electromagnetic field interpret the meaning of what we think of as being ‘masses of matter'.

Now it just logically follows that since the electromagnetic field is unable to distinguish between ‘a mass of matter' and ‘a quantity of energy' it becomes a trivial matter to create a new form of electromagnetic propulsion, and it becomes a trivial matter to cause some object to float suspended in midair within some gravitational field. All we need to do is to embed within the mass of our craft a powerful electromagnetic field of our own so as to increase our apparent energetic density, thus causing our total energetic density to be perceived differently by the electromagnetic field in such a way as we will find our selves ‘sorted', according to the requirements of that Inverse Square Law, in such a way that we will be found floating in midair at some fixed location in the field. As long as we are in a 'proper orbit' we can float in midair unmolested by the electromagnetic field for we will not be perceived as possessing either an attractive or repulsive charge. What this means is that ‘relative mass' (momentum energy) and ‘absolute mass' (matter) are additive, and by simply adding them together we can confuse that electromagnetic field, for the field is unable to distinguish between matter and energy, for it really is true that E=MC2.

It is for this reason that we could find some frog floating in a zero G environment, as though the frog was in a space capsule heading towards the moon, for the electromagnetic field was fooled by that pocket of energetically dense space, and therefore the ‘charge like' phenomenon was shut down, and the field did not bother molesting that frog, or trying to properly sort the frog, because the frog was perceived to already be in the correct orbital energy state due to the additive nature of the electromagnetic field produced and the energy represented by the absolute mass of the frog.

It is possible that such an experiment has already been conducted by accident at the Large Hadron Collider. In the images above you can see the damage caused to the magnets in the collider, which show evidence for a violent upward momentum force. The collider is the most powerful scientific device ever created, and we can think of these magnets as being like little spacecraft, such that when the device is fully powered the combination of magnetic field momentum energy and the mass of magnets themselves is enough to cause a powerful negative g-force effect to build up as the magnets attempt to lift off into a higher orbit. Therefore it could be that one unexpected purpose of that Large Hadron Collider will be to become that device that was finally powerful enough to create the energy levels required to justify one of the predictions of the Unified Field Theory. Of course the device would have to disappoint everyone and break once again, and one of the repairs made to the device was to use even more bolts to hold down those magnets so that they would not jump up again, so perhaps we will never know, just depending on how it all works out.

A summary of the Unified Field Theory

INDEX