In the image above we conduct a thought experiment designed to convert ‘momentum energy' of this ‘warped space field' into the form of heat. We use mechanical force to squeeze together two similar poles of a bar magnet. The result is the generation of a force field, and since all force fields are involved in the transfer of energy, the result is the transfer of momentum energy into this crude device (the purpose of this momentum energy being to generate motion and force apart the two similar poles of the bar magnet). However the poles are unable to move and therefore the momentum energy will be expressed in the form of mechanical stress in the device which will generate constant heat. We imagine the device immersed in water to carry away this generated heat so that ‘melting' followed by bending will not occur, thus keeping the two poles of the bar magnet squeezed together and resulting in a constant force field and the constant generation of this energy.

We conclude that a relationship exists between ‘heat' and ‘momentum' in that when momentum is not allowed to be expressed in the form of motion the energy is expressed in the form of heating.





A relationship seems to exist between ‘spin' and ‘charge'. In the image above we represent ‘a mass of matter' (green) surrounded by a ‘warped space field' (purple). We know that whenever energy is transferred by means of this ‘warped space field' the result is always expressed in the form of a change in momentum. As one example, the moon is gaining about 3 centimeters worth of momentum each year through a gravitational tidal interaction with the earth. We may wonder where the ‘conserved momentum' of an object is ‘stored' and it would seem that a ‘gravitational field' is also a ‘momentum field' in that the energy ‘conserved' in this field is momentum energy (a change in the energy of this field results in a change of momentum). Another example of the same thing is the ‘flyby effect' whereby spacecraft are given additional momentum by swinging through the gravitational field of some planet (and since you never get something for nothing we can assume that the effect of such flybys is to reduce the momentum and thus slightly reduce the orbital radius of the planetary body making this donation of energy to the spacecraft).

We conclude that ‘heat' (the ‘temperature' of an object) is related to momentum in that ‘heat' is stored in the form of ‘internal angular momentum' in the momentum field. This internal ‘spin' is then expressed in the form of a ‘charge'. We represent this increased ‘charge' by enlarging the image at the bottom to represent the increased spin in the momentum field (a higher temperature) with the result being that ‘hot gas expands' (a greater repellant charge is generated, forcing apart the hot gas atoms).





A glow in the dark toy emits ‘green photons'. The phosphorescent medium absorbs light energy and then stores it much like a solar battery (it is both a collector and a battery). When a photon is absorbed the atoms enter into a ‘meta-stable state'. The device should become a permanent solar battery, for a ‘forbidden transition' is involved in releasing a green photon. That such a transition is forbidden is related to ‘electron spin' and the ‘magnetic moment' and the ‘Paula exclusion principle', and one simplified way to imagine why such a transition out of a meta-stable state is forbidden is to imagine squeezing together the two similar poles of a bar magnet (it is a forbidden state). Nevertheless the atoms manage to navigate through this barrier and release a green photon. What causes the glow in the dark toy to move past this ‘forbidden transition' and release the green photon is outside environmental influences, in particular the simple exchange of heat energy between atoms. This environmental influences create the instability required to dislodge the green photon.

One way around this problem would be to super cool the glow in the dark toy by lowering the temperature somewhere close to absolute zero. This is impractical and therefore you never see phosphorescent medium employed in solar cells, even though this is nature's solar battery (rather we see silicon employed along with a lithium cell battery, which is less efficient, in particular when you consider that phosphorescent medium already contains a built in solar battery).

We will think of ‘friction' as being the perceived ‘physical manifestation' of the force required to exchange heat energy (internal angular momentum of the momentum field) between fields. This force (friction) is also the primary cause of the loss of solar energy by phosphorescent material. This makes me wonder if it would not be possible to eliminate the force field by creating a super stable temperature environment. It would seem to me that just about any temperature would so, even room temperature, provided that the temperature was super stable thus eliminating transfer of heat energy (and the frictional force). This would be a simpler solution than considering super cooling such a device.