The earth follows an eccentric elliptical orbit around the sun, which has been exaggerated in the image above. It follows from this that the earth's velocity around the sun is faster during the closest transit to the sun and then the earth's velocity decreases as it moves through the furthest portion of its transit around the sun.

Now we will interpret this to mean that the momentum of the earth is relative. The earth conserves momentum at all points, but since momentum is relative and the velocity expressed is dependant upon the density of the surrounding field, the earth experiences relative acceleration as its elliptical orbit takes in transit through a denser part of the sun's energy field. Here we are once again assuming that energy and three dimensional space are equivalent and that a three dimensional space field is just one more manifestation of that chameleon known as ‘energy', so that a certain number of joules would be equivalent to one cubic meter of three dimensional space. We assume that the earth experiences a relative increase in acceleration for the same reason that an object moving towards the surface of the earth experiences relative acceleration while at the same time conserving momentum. Therefore the earth decelerates at the greatest distance in its orbital transit for the same reason that the Pioneer Spacecraft decelerate (the relativity of momentum).

More energy is equivalent to more space. The Inverse Square Law describes the density distribution of this energy that composes space, with the density increasing nearer the center of the field. If we wish we could say that as energy density increases, space dilates, which is to say that there is more space near the center of the field. This describes a geometry consistent with General Relativity (the idea of some bowling ball being dropped onto a trampoline and then ‘stretching' the trampoline). If we adopt the perspective of a fictional objective observer then we could say that one square meter near the center of the field is ‘smaller' than one square meter further out in the field (you would need a microscope to see it, or, better said, a telescope).

We assume that momentum is a density function, and that as an object moves into this dense portion of the energy field, its field energy does not dilate, but rather becomes more dense as well. (We could therefore think of this apparent dilation of space as being a kind of perceptual illusion, and we will concern ourselves not with ‘physical perceptions' but rather with the underlying manifestations of the energy field itself).

We assume that as the earth transits this denser portion of the energy field, the field of the earth ‘shrinks' (not that anyone notices, for when everyone shrinks alike, no one shrinks very much). The result is a relative increase in the density of the momentum field and therefore a relative increase in momentum.

One way to test certain assumptions concerning relative black holes would involve dropping objects through a vacuum at various times as the earth makes its transit through the surrounding energy field. We would expect the earth's gravitational force field to remain constant, being dependant upon only the absolute mass of the earth (which is to say this is the result of a balance between impedance generated by strong quantum forces in the atoms of the earth and the ‘g force' which we locate in the energy field itself, so that the same relative increase in momentum that increases this ‘g force' (the rate of acceleration of a moving object in the field) is balanced by an increase in this quantum impedance, with the result being a constant gravitational force field experienced by a motionless object sitting upon the surface of the earth).

But what of an object falling through a vacuum. We assume that the ‘g force' which produces relative acceleration in a gravitational field is dependant upon only the field itself and is not a pulling force originating from the center of the earth but rather a pushing, expelling force originating in the energy field itself. For this reason I have been considering the possibility that an object dropped in a vacuum when the earth is closest to the sun would experience a slight increase in relative acceleration, this being a product of the slight increase in field density (the field has decreased slightly in size resulting in a relative increase in momentum and an increase in velocity around the sun, with the same relative increase in density causing a dropped object to accelerate slightly faster as it travels through the field when the earth is closest to the sun).