A Unified Field Theory
A summary of the Unified Field Theory
INDEX
Quantum Time Revisited
We make the assumption that a human brain is a quantum subsystem. When the human brain perceives energy arranged in a certain form it interprets this energy as being ‘a baked potato' (E=MC2). When energy is arranged in another form the human brain perceives ‘a warped three dimensional space field' (AKA ‘the empty vacuum of space' or ‘the blank void of space' and so on).
We assume that ‘three dimensional space' is just one more manifestation of that chameleon known as energy (also referred to in particle physics as ‘the Higgs field'). I assumed that as field density increases (as described by the Inverse Square Law) it must be true that quantum processes ‘blue shift' (the field density increases (blue shifts) and therefore quantum processes ‘blue shift' at the same time). This idea is wrong headed and it finally occurred to me that the opposite must hold true.
The two Pioneer spacecraft are decelerating at a constant rate as they move through less energetically dense portions of the space field (the rate of deceleration being equivalent to the product of the speed of light and Hubble's constant). As the space field dilates (becomes ‘red shifted') the two Pioneer spacecraft must ‘blue shift' their momentum field if they are to maintain a constant velocity. The opposite must also hold true. If the two Pioneer spacecraft were to maintain a consistent velocity then if the space field was becoming more dense (‘blue shifting') then the two space craft must ‘red shift' their momentum fields in order to maintain a consistent velocity. We can see from observing the behavior of these two space craft that older Newtonian ideas of ‘absolute momentum' being expressed in ‘absolute space' are false. Einstein also made an incorrect assumption in his Special Theory of Relativity where he states that we assume that ‘space is homogenous' (which is another way of saying that momentum is constant and that momentum is not relative). The behavior of the two Pioneer space craft refute this erroneous assumption, for they reveal that momentum is relative and that space is not ‘homogenous'.

You may have heard about the hypothesis that there exist some sort of mysterious and exotic ‘dark matter' in the universe. I am convinced that this hypothesis is totally erroneous is one of the consequences of the mistakes made by Albert Einstein (the idea that space is ‘homogenous' and that momentum is some sort of fixed constant in the universe).
The ‘Dark Matter' hypothesis was first formulated to explain the anomalous apparent rotation of galaxies. On the left we see the expected rotation of objects in a gravitational field. Those objects close to the center of the field rotate at a greater speed than objects further out. On the right we see the apparent rotation of galaxies. The galaxy seems to rotate as though it was a solid body, with objects near the center of the galaxy appearing to rotate with the same speed as objects further out. Therefore, it was suggested that galaxies must be like solid bodies and must be full of this so called ‘dark matter', which would then explain why it is that galaxies seem to rotate like one single solid body.
In the image above we illustrate an interpretation of the apparent anomalous rotation curve of galaxies which takes into consideration the relativity of momentum and the consequent relativity of quantum processes. A galaxy exhibits behavior very similar to that of the two Pioneer spacecraft. Momentum in quantum processes is conserved in the center of galaxies by the emission of ‘red shifted' spectra (as the field density ‘blue shifts', or becomes denser, momentum is conserved by means of ‘red shifting' of momentum fields, and as the field density ‘red shifts', becoming less dense, momentum is conserved by means of the ‘blue shifting' of momentum fields, as the momentum fields become less energetically dense. The result is the production of the characteristic ‘flat line' of the velocity curve observed in galaxies. The difference between the expected velocity gradient (the dashed line) and the actual observed velocity gradient (the solid line) is caused by the quantum red-shift (for there are three causes of red shifting in the universe, the Doppler effect, the Gravitational Red Shift, and this red shifting of quantum processes as quantum processes ‘conserve momentum' in an inverse relationship to increasing or decreasing field density).
This ‘red shifting' of quantum processes as field density ‘blue shifts' also explains the anomalous presence of ‘high red shift quasars' within ‘low red shift galaxies'. The extra red shift being produced by such quasars would be the equivalent of billions of light years (as measured by the Doppler effect). The relativity of momentum and the relativity of quantum processes suggests that so called ‘Black Holes' are not ‘crushed singularities' where we are told that ‘all of the laws of physics break down', but rather ‘Black Holes' are just very humongous, huge huge masses. This leads us to conclude that part of this billions of light years of perceived ‘distance' is caused by the quantum red-shift while the remainder is caused by the fact that quasars originate deep down inside some black hole (gravitational red shift). According to the matter based interpretation of gravity ‘nothing can escape from a black hole' but we assume here that the motion of electromagnetic radiation is a field effect and therefore there does not seem to be any legitimate reason why the field of some black hole would not emit electromagnetic radiation (at a very, very slow speed). One way to prove beyond doubt that black holes emit the radiation from quasars from deep within the black hole (and not from the accretion disk outside the black hole) would be to determine how much of the billions of light years of red shift was the result of ‘quantum red shift' for the remainder would have to be gravitational red shift caused by the black hole itself. (Discovery Poses Cosmic Puzzle: Can A 'Distant' Quasar Lie Within A Nearby Galaxy?. "How could a galaxy 300 million light years away contain a stellar object several billion light years away?")
I have suggested that ‘time' is not some ‘fourth dimension of the universe' but rather time is just a consequence of the relativity of momentum, in that quantum processes must exchange information through motion through the energy field and that the rate at which this energy exchange takes place is entirely dependant upon the field strength. When the field strength increases the rate of information exchange slows down, and since reality as we know it is entirely defined by the underlying quantum processes which are the true building blocks of all perceived reality, therefore it would appear that ‘clocks slow down'. Time is relative because momentum is relative and therefore quantum processes are also relative. What we wind up with is illustrated in the graphic above. When quantum processes conserve momentum by emitting highly energetic blue shifted information (when the energy field is less dense, and therefore ‘red shifted') the result is a faster clock speed. When the field is blue shifted (more dense) the quantum processes ‘conserve momentum' by emitting less energetic ‘red shifted' information, and the result is a relative decrease in the perceived clock speed. I would appear that one of the reason why the ‘clock slows down' as the field strength increases is that quantum processes are required to ‘exchange momentum' in a certain fixed manner, and when the product is red shifted by interaction with a strong field the transfer of information ‘takes longer' (the motion through the field is extended) and this results in ‘the slowing of the time like phenomenon'.
A summary of the Unified Field Theory
INDEX