When electromagnetic waves are employed to communicate with a satellite in orbit, the wave as received by the satellite is red shifted, and compensation is required so as to be able to receive the transmission.

When NASA sends a space craft to Jupiter, the craft builds up its momentum, and when the desired velocity through space is achieved, the engines are shut down and the craft coasts all the way to Jupiter. When the engines are turned on, g-forces are experienced as a transfer of energy takes place and the energy accumulates in the momentum field of the space craft. While the engines are shut down and the craft is coasting through space at the desired velocity, a zero gravity environment exists and there are no g forces because there is no longer any transfer of energy taking place (in nature, the force field is always present whenever a transfer of energy is involved).

When an object is coasting through space in a part of the field closer to the surface of a planet, its behavior does not change. A zero gravity environment still exists. There are no g forces experienced by a body moving towards the surface of the earth because gravity is not ‘pulling or tugging' on that object. This idea of Newton's was wrong. The object continues to coast through space, there being no difference if the space was some patch on the way to Jupiter or some patch on the way to the surface of the earth. The trip is zero g in both cases. The one difference here is that the object coasting towards the earth is experiencing a relative acceleration. That this acceleration is relative is demonstrated by the fact that there are no g-forces involved, and since it is this g-force that is the force involved in the transfer of all momentum, it therefore follows that momentum is relative in that the meaning of momentum changes dependant upon the density of the field in which it is being expressed in the form of motion and velocity. There is such a thing as ‘conserved momentum' but there is no such thing as ‘constant momentum'.

The universe as described by the matter based theory of gravity holds momentum as being constant. For this reason if you watch the program Cosmos, you will hear Carl Sagan describe how the two Pioneer spacecraft would cruise through space on their conserved momentum only and in one billion years would perhaps be discovered by intelligent life on the other side of the galaxy, who would then listen to our recording of Mozart, this being the reason why a recording of Mozart was included as part of the payload of the Pioneer craft. According to the Unified Field Theory, a more likely fate of the two Pioneer spacecraft is that they are in the process of becoming two long period comets circling around the earth's sun, for just as momentum is relative moving down in a gravitational field, so, too, is momentum relative moving up in the gravitational field of the sun. It is for this reason that the Pioneer spacecraft are decelerating as they rise in the field, just as an object accelerates as it moves down in the field, and the best evidence that the craft ‘conserved momentum' during this deceleration process would be seen when they then begin to fall back down, until finally they become two very high speed comets whipping around the sun. Now if they manage to steal a little momentum from the sun on a couple of those fly bys they may eventually conserve enough momentum to get hurled right out of the influence of the solar system, and will then begin to decelerate or accelerate in the galactic field, just depending on which direction they happen to get flung and what's out there. Momentum is relative.

If momentum is relative then it follows from this that the speed, frequency, and wavelength of light must also be relative to the field in which they are being expressed. This must be true for it is only in this way that momentum can be conserved for quantum processes which are occurring in the environment defined by differing surrounding field intensities.

Let's suppose that you had a pop gun that was spring loaded and you were to shoot corks at some cardboard cut out of a duck so as to knock it down. If you failed to wind up the spring all the way, the cork would not have enough momentum and would be unable to knock down the cardboard duck.

Let's assume that there were three frames, one of which we will assign the role of being the reference frame, the purpose of this reference frame being to give a basis for comparison with other frames. A frame exists which is higher in the field (a low density, low intensity region of the field). We will call this the red-shifted frame. A frame exists which is lower in the field, which means that the field is denser and more intense, and so we will call this blue shifted frame.

Let's assume that we were to shoot a duck with a ‘green' photon in the median reference frame. In the blue shifted frame, clocks run slower. We assume that ‘time' is light dependant, in that no process can occur faster than the mediating process. Therefore we assume that the speed of light is relative to that frame, and when compared to the reference frame, therefore the speed of light is slower in the blue shifted frame for the clock is running slower. If we shoot a green photon at a duck in the blue shifted frame the result is a loss of momentum, for ‘green' implies a less energetic waveform fired at a lower velocity. However if we tighten the spring and fire a blue photon in the blue shifted frame, what we get is a bluer, higher energy photon being fired at a lower velocity, and therefore we have compensated and conservation of momentum is the result. This momentum is important in quantum processes. We would do the opposite in the red shifted frame, where the clock is running faster, and we would therefore loosen up the spring (red shift) and once again conservation of momentum is the result. What we can see here is a king of time induced relative red shift in the low density field and a corresponding time induced relative blue shift in the higher density field.

Let's suppose that a process produced a green photon in the reference frame and that this result was then sent to both the red shifted and blue shifted frames. The result would be incorrect, for the red shifted (lower density field) frame would receive a red shifted photon while the blue frame would receive a higher energy blue photon. In this way we can see that nature is careful to conserve momentum in each relative frame but is unconcerned about observers or processes in neighboring frames. The universe is quite deceitful but not completely dedicated to the task. This could be a contributing cause for the volatility seen in the quantum world, which is very unusual and requires explanation, for an atom, by nature, is a very balanced creation, and should be a fine example of entropy achieved and entropy maintained, but it is not.

Atoms should not be seen gambling and playing dice all day long, and yet they do, and neither should atoms behave in crazy random ways, such that you could never really be sure what an atom might do from one moment to the next, and this odd behavior does require an explanation. A an atom should exist in a state of sublime bliss enjoying a perpetual state of restful entropy, with all its parts being perfectly balanced in glorious eternal harmony, which would make for a very boring universe. The universe must be interesting for very good reasons. The relativity of processes is no doubt one piece of the puzzle because it introduces some of the required instability into the system which is required if we are to disturb the sublime and perfect entropy of an atom.

Let's suppose that three scientists run the ‘green' photon process in the three different frames. One will receive a red photon, one a green photon, and the third a blue photon. However all will report that the result of the experiment was a green photon, for their experimental equipment is a participant in all quantum processes, and for this reason there is no genuinely objective frame for the frame of the observer is a relative frame. It is only by comparing results in adjacent frames can the observer create a fictional objective frame (fictional, because it can never really exist).