According to particle physics, the Higgs field is an energy field that permeates all of space. As such it is this field that is responsible for giving matter its property of being a ‘mass'. The idea here is that the field reacts to matter as though matter was a disruption in the field. It is also this field that gives a quantized ‘mass like' property to ‘bosons' (tiny fragments of energy released into the field by means of a force, such forces being required if the entropy of the field is to be disturbed by such unwanted intrusions).
In the diagram above we see an atom releasing energy by slowly leaking excess energy into the field (at the top). This never happens, for the field generates impedance, and therefore a force is always present whenever energy is transferred between fields. The result is that energy can only be transferred when it is ‘quantized'. It released all at once in packets which require force. For this reason a force field is always involved in any transfer of energy (one example of this would be the force you feel when you step on the accelerator of a car to increase the momentum energy, and then feel yourself being pushed back into the seat by the impedance of the surrounding field energy of the universe...something similar happens in all transfers of energy, and there is a force involved to overcome the resisting impedance of the field on the receiving end of the transfer).
It has been said that the Higgs field is responsible for giving matter its ‘mass' and this idea does not make sense to me, for it would be better to say that a Higgs field is responsible for matter keeping its property of being a ‘mass' once it already has that property. As for how matter came to be a ‘mass' in the first place is problem that remains to be resolved.
In the diagram above we display a crude device designed to verify the existence of this energy field. We use mechanical force to create a discontinuity in the energy field by squeezing together two similar poles of two bar magnets. This generates a powerful force field. (A bar magnet has two poles, and I am assuming that squeezing together two North Poles would create an ‘empty discontinuity' in the space field.) The result will be the transfer of energy in the form of momentum (resulting in movement and pushing apart the poles of the magnets). Since it is impossible to push apart the two poles of the magnets, we assume that one of the products of this mechanical stress will be the constant production of heat energy.
We assume that all fields are Higgs fields (this is the Unified Field Theory after all). Even the tiniest subatomic particle has such a field, which is a momentum field. The earth is surrounded by a warped space field, which is a momentum field. Whenever energy is transferred by means of this warped space field the result is always expressed in the form of an exchange of momentum energy (examples include flybys of spacecraft to give them a boost in speed, or the increasing momentum of the moon as the moon gains momentum energy through the tidal interaction, or when a tiny particle is accelerated by using the momentum field of magnets to impart momentum energy to the momentum field surrounding the particle).
We assume that all Higgs fields are momentum fields and that all interactions are interactions between fields. The Higgs field does not ‘interact with masses' but instead it interacts with the mass field.
Now what happens when momentum cannot be expressed in the form of motion. It must be expressed in some other way. Some sort of curious relationship exists between ‘spin' and ‘charge' in that two particles with opposite spin possess ‘attractive charges'. In the image above we see two ‘charged particles' which possess momentum and then collide. (We assume that the ‘spin' is expressed in the surrounding field energy, as indicated by the blue arrows, with the field energy suggested by the purple color surrounding the ‘mass', colored green). Momentum is then conserved in the form of angular momentum. The particles cannot bounce or richochet, because they are attractive to one another. They stick together, and therefore they must spin, as their momentum is converted to the angular momentum of spin. This generates a spinning magnetic field, which converts the momentum of other particles to angular momentum as well. On the right we then see one of those enormous space tornadoes that create stars and planets in the universe. Whatever creates these enormous electromagnetic vortexes must be very common for there are billions of galaxies with billions of stars and billions and billions of planets.
In the diagram of the device shown above we see that the device is not able to generate motion (so as to push apart the poles of the bar magnet) and therefore it must conserve momentum in some other form, and this would result in the generation of heat. We could then verify the existence of the Higgs Field (which we will assume is just one more name given to this energy field which pervades all space), and we can also prove the existence of a Higgs Boson (since a force carrier is required to transfer this field energy). Let's suppose that the mechanical force used to screw the device together was ‘X' joules. We would monitor and record heat energy equivalent to ‘X+1' joules, just to eliminate any possible doubt. The energy could not have been produced by mechanical force (X joules) and therefore must be field energy. This would then suggest that a ‘Higgs Boson' must be a force carrier of momentum energy in the universe. This also causes me to wonder whether it is really required that there be a ‘graviton' (this would seem to be redundant and would be giving another name to a ‘Higg's Boson', and it seems that there are already more than enough different names given to the same phenomenon by different fields of the sciences, which then contributes to a lack of clarity).
We suggest that a momentum field possesses some internal ‘spin' property, for a relationship exists between momentum and ‘temperature'. When momentum cannot be translated into motion, it is translated into angular momentum, and in the case of the generation of heat, it is translated into internal angular momentum, the spin of the momentum field receiving the energy. This idea does make sense if we think of ‘temperature' as possessing properties similar to a ‘charge'. Hot gas expands as the increased charge increases repulsion (the result of an increase in this ‘internal spin' of the momentum field, where momentum energy is transferred when motion is impossible). Similarly as the spin goes down towards absolute zero, the charge phenomenon disappears and the result is the creation of a Bose Einstein Condensate, where all the atoms behave like one single atom clustered into one single lump (the absence of any residual repulsive spin charge, caused by lowering the temperature to absolute zero, thus reducing the repulsive spin charge to absolute zero at the same time).
In this way we can see that a Higgs Boson is a force carrier of momentum, for the result of creating a disruption in the field by squeezing together two similar poles of the bar magnet is to generate momentum force (to push apart the two poles) and if that proves to be impossible the momentum energy is then translated into ‘internal spin' in the momentum field of quantum masses, and assumes the form of ‘stored momentum' (a repulsive charge, which increases as the transfer of momentum energy continues). The same Higgs field that maintains ‘mass', would be the same Higgs field that pushes mass from one point to another in the field, resulting in motion (for the property of motion we assign to the field itself, as the problem is pushed from one location to another, where the process is repeated). Even though a ‘g force' is not felt when no transfer of energy into the momentum field is taking place (the object is maintaining ‘conserved momentum') a force must still be present for energy is being transferred by means of motion (from point A to point B as the object coasts through space).
We would then consider a Higg's field to be equivalent to a gravitational field, which is a momentum field (with this ‘warped space field' being the carrier of all the energy referred to when we speak of ‘conserved momentum'). We can see that ‘temperature' is a variant of momentum energy (we assume that the momentum field possesses this property of ‘internal spin'). We can see this ‘charge like' repulsion as a form of ‘stored momentum' and if such a device was to become hot enough to bend metal, the result would be motion, the product of momentum, which would eventually push apart the two similar poles of the bar magnets. What we refer to as ‘friction' would be the perceived ‘physical manifestation' of the force involved in the transfer of this internal spin energy between quantum systems (with the end result being the reduction of charge as the system approaches a state of equality, for it is characteristic of energy systems to move toward a state of entropy where energy is evenly distributed in the field).
Where there is smoke there is fire. Where there is heat energy there is electricity. What is required is that we must translate this momentum force into external angular momentum (rather than heat), which would drive a rotor shaft which would drive an electromagnetic turbine, which would produce electricity, which would be one more way of demonstrating that a Higgs Field and a Higgs Boson are part of the universal energy cycle, for it proved possible to employ a Higgs boson to run a toaster and a coffee pot in the morning.