Biological Algorithms
A few years ago I conducted an experiment intended to test an hypothesis I had formulated which postulated that ‘evolution' and so-called ‘miracle cures' were both the products of ‘biological algorithms'. It has been said that as much as 97 percent of the genetic code is ‘junk DNA', in that the majority of the genome does not code for proteins. According to my hypothesis, what we actually are seeing here is a biological code of great complexity and sophistication, and given that the biological sciences are only in their infancy and barely out of the cradle, we have not yet even begun to understand the depth of the complexity and sophistication of this recently discovered code of life. If the belief prevails that states that all life is the result of ‘random mutations among proteins' and this is the currently prevailing paradigm (which then makes the rest of that code ‘junk DNA') the only reason for this has to do less with science and more with philosophical bias, in that the existence of complex biological algorithms is incompatible with the philosophy of an atheist, and most of our scientists are either atheists, or have bought into that idea that somehow science must be practiced by atheists, or somehow it just would not be science.I am not an atheist, and so when I am shown a body of evidence I am free to interpret the same evidence and formulate an entirely different theory. An atheist would not formulate the same theory as I would, not for reasons of ‘science' or ‘evidence' but rather because philosophical bias is always found to be incorporated into scientific theory. Human beings are just not able to view the world in any other way than that which is dictated by the personal system of beliefs. Scientists are human beings and so it is no surprise that they behave in this way.
When I was younger my nose became sunburned and damaged over time, and since I hated that nose, I decided that the best way to put my hypothesis to the test would be to use those biological algorithms in order to repair the tissues on my damaged nose. I made the assumption that this conscious ability to control these algorithms was possible, for it is true that in about 3 percent of all fatal illnesses, there occurs an as yet unexplained sudden and spontaneous remission. When it happens to a Catholic, it is called the divine intervention of some saint, and when it happens to a Protestant, it is called the grace of Jesus, and when it happens to occur with no religious trappings involved in the process, it is called one of the great enigmas confronting modern medicine.
The photograph above shows the results of the experiment. My digital camera was not that good, but you can see in the image my ‘half healed nose'. I halted the experiment when I had achieved this result because I decided to ‘save the rest for later'. You see when someone does something like this, they want to be observed, not ignored. Now that I am ignored is only because our scientists are not just ‘pure scientists' but our scientists are also evangelical philosophers, whose great goal is to use ‘scientific evidence' to finish off the great centuries long feud between religion and science, by finally converting the entire human race into followers of the philosophy of scientific atheism. ‘Random mutations' are useful in promoting this agenda. Complex algorithms, the sophisticated software of life, is not, and so therefore I am inconvenient.
I am also inconvenient to our religions, for it is in the nature of religion to employ dogma as the starting point, and then work backwards looking for evidence to support dogma. According to science the truth is supposed to be something objective that one searches for an then accepts for what it is, while for religion the truth is something that can be manufactured and therefore we see such strange practices as the religious holding meetings, debating, and then voting upon the truth, as though the truth was somehow subjective, and therefore subject to the results of the vote of some religious institution.
Therefore I summarize as follows. I am inconvenient for science, because I am not an atheist, and I am inconvenient for religion, because I am not dogmatic.
Understanding History
I have told people to story concerning what happened to me when I was fifteen. I have been to the mountaintop. This event took place when I was fifteen. This was another one of my experiments. You see I have no use for dogmas. I want to base my belief system upon objective and observable evidence. When I was five years old, I had my first encounter with a church when my parents decided, for some reason, that all children should attend something they called ‘Sunday School'. It was at this time that I was told about the far away god of religion, this god of the dead, who would let your ghost live up in heaven after you died, provided that you had religion down here on earth while you were alive. The way this divine plan of this god of the dead worked was that you were supposed to flip a coin and guess whether or not there was a god of the dead, for as everyone knows that god of the dead is not the god of the living in any real sense of the word. Rather that god of the dead would decide who would go to heaven, all dependant upon how that blind coin tossing work of salvation turned out in each individual case. It might be said that such a plan was harsh and very cruel, and that it could be made easier, but it is acceptable for the god of the dead became the god of the living long, long ago, just long enough to write a book. It is for this reason that we have churches and mosques and other such institutions, for it turns out that after the god of the dead writes a book, that god of the dead will never again be seen in the land of the living, and so therefore the task of getting people into ghost heaven becomes the job of priest, who reminds of our absent god, lest we forget.My reaction to this gracious offer of ‘the salvation of my soul' when I was five, was to draw what I thought at the time was the obvious conclusion that these religious people were fraudulent, and that the plain and simple truth of the matter was that they were in exile, having been rejected by that God of theirs, and then sent packing for thousands of years. Since it was obvious that if a person had religion they had no god, and since it was obvious that this ‘theology' was nothing more than a transparent lie intended to excuse the rejection of the religious by that god of theirs, I therefore made up my mind on that very same afternoon that my life would be dedicated to the glorious project of meeting the God of the Living in the land of the living, for any God worth knowing would be a God of the living, and not some cruel and pitiless god of the dead, who forced people to flip coins, and then spend the rest of their life worrying about it while wondering if they made the right choice.
Ten years later when I went up that mountain in Banff with the intention of meeting that Living God, once and for all, and settling the issue for the last time, one way or the other, it was just a continuation of what had begun when I was five years old, and encountered something called a church and the gracious offer of the salvation of my ghost after I was dead.
Now many are those who have gone up mountain tops and came down disappointed, having met no Living God who was willing to meet with a human being on some mountaintop. When you have that consistent failure rate, and then one single person, such as myself comes along, and claims to have done that mountain top thing, and pulled a rabbit our of a hat, naturally people say that this cannot be true. Its like that old saying, ‘eat manure for one trillion house flies cannot be wrong.'
People always make the same mistakes when they go up to some mountain top. For example, they will promise to be ‘sexually pure' from now on. This is very religious. No doubt this will melt the cold heart of that dead god. They will make a promise to donate money to some charity to help a few token homeless orphans. They seem to think that this will greatly please that dead god, and bring that thing to life. It does not occur to them that this God might be wondering why they have homeless orphans in the first place, and one also has to wonder why someone would think that helping a token orphan by giving ‘charity' was supposed to be a virtue, especially when you consider all the throw away orphans who receive no charity, for as we all know, when you have charity you have lots of misery, for people only have charity because it is less expensive than actually dealing with the problems confronting humanity, which would then make charity redundant.
Now in order to understand why it would be the case that I would succeed on that mountain top where others have failed, it would be necessary to understand just who it was who went up that mountain. I was little Adam. I was wearing no fig leaf, and to this day I refuse to wear such fig leaf, for I noticed as a child that religious people wore fig leaves, and I also noticed just how absurd that idea seemed to be, and so therefore, given my great goal of not winding up rejected and sent into exile, I made a point of ditching the fig leaf. The idea of promising some God that I would do charity, and make some donations was also off my list, because even as a small child I was aware of just what a stupid idea that was, and since I was not intending to burnish my resume, but rather I really did care, and since I was convinced that God would not tolerate a fool, I promised that God a revolution. I was like a junior Moses, and it turns out that God really does like Moses, or someone like that, someone whose goal would not be to burnish their resume by promising to buy extra straw for the slaves making those mud bricks, but rather someone who clean the clocks of those oppressive Egyptians and liberate their many victims. God likes that sort of thing a lot. Just ditching the fig leaf is not enough. You need that Moses thing as well.
I thought it good to point these things out to people, for I am always telling people that, yes, believe it or not, I did go up to the mountain top, and voila, abracadabra, that did work out for me, and people keep telling me that it is impossible to meet God in the land of the living, for so many have tried, and all have failed, so therefore who the hell do I think I am to be telling people something like that.
We Are Not Alone
Now in the years since I came down from the mountain top in Banff National Park, I have been surrounded by a company of advisers whose task it is to see that I remaining standing and get through it all just fine. These people are not from around here. They possess a remarkable technology. Their craft they travel in are able to float suspended in midair. They have a recognizable phosphorescent glow.According to what they told me, such outfits as the Pentagon and the CIA or CSIS are aware of the presence of these advisers of mine. I can believe that. You see when you are someone like me, and you are visited night after night by these unusual glowing craft, even the most incompetent spy on the planet would have no trouble verifying that such things are in fact going on. I have been informed by these advisers of mine that these people know what has been happening, and I believe it. It would be next to impossible to miss.
You know just a few weeks ago, a fellow I work with, was outside in the evening and I was also outside in the evening, and voila, he saw them. Now they are visiting him when he steps outside. Apparently two of these luminous craft paid him a visit just the other evening. I have also seen groups of people standing outside staring up at the sky, watching and waiting. I don't know who these people are, but apparently they noticed something going on up there.
The point I am making is as follows. I tell you people these things, and then you tell me and each other that this is not true. Now unless you are willing to take a look for yourself, then you should either keep your mouth shut, and say nothing at all (you don't have the right to speak for you skipped that step and did not investigate) or you should join in the attempt to build a great wall of oppression, throwing stone upon stone upon stone, for then maybe you shall prevail. You should slam shut every door and then padlock those slammed doors, and maintain a united front. Perhaps then you shall prevail and save the global Egyptian imperialist empire.
Poverty
You hear a lot about poverty these days. Apparently global poverty is like an unfortunate road accident. Its just something that happened. Now it could be true that the human race has developed amnesia, and that people forget about those centuries of global conquest and invasion and plundering and looting and sacking. You know, if you bust into someone's house and steal the money under the mattress, whoever is in that house will be flat broke. It just logically follows. It is called Capitalist Imperialist Colonialism. Or in more recent times it has been called ‘neoliberal globalization', which is the same thing, only a little less overtly violent. It means that you must not piss of the capitalist, or poor countries will find their balls squeezed in a vice when that capitalist uses his control of the world economy to bust the balls of any colony that does not allow that capitalist to repatriate all those profits. This is the benefit of all the poor people in the world, who will find their countries developed in about five centuries from now, through the miracle of the trickle down theory of economics.By the way, this just one more reason why God likes me, and then sends other people down that mountain slope empty handed. It is the intention of God to make me into a kind of role model for you people, so that if you want to avoid pissing off God, you might have some kind of a clue as to how to go about doing something like that (and we all know just how cruel God can be, now don't we).
As for capitalism, it is incompatible with democracy, for it would be impossible for an economic system built upon the foundations of the ‘boss principle' and the total control of a small group of wanna be alpha males to ever assume anything other than a fascistic form. Democracy under this system is nothing but a gloss, and does not yet really exist on this planet. This then explains why you people vote only to find that your politicians are always pissing you off. Therefore you will have to play musical chairs and keep throwing the buggers out of office, only to wind up getting screwed over again and again and again, for you see, even politicians must listen to the boss, lest they, too, find their balls being squeezed in a vice.
You know the Pope has just released an encyclical on the subject of economics, and the Vatican in Rome was at pains to point out that this encyclical was ‘not anti-capitalist'. This would then go a long ways towards explaining why it is that the Roman Catholic church remains totally godforsaken even after two thousand long years of that long dark night of the soul. I am not and this is why I am being made into a role model, while a Pope can only ever be role model of the fruits of godforsaken religion.
A Social Experiment
I have received instructions that the time has come for me to pick up where I left off with that experiment concerning biological algorithms.I am very worried about this, but I am making a leap of faith. What I fear the most is that you people, because of your reckless oppression and your refusal to do anything right, will once again be confronted with that dreadful scenario of requiring ‘hopeful faith'. You see, you had the opportunity to forgo the tormented worrying and second guessing, by performing a scientific experiment, which is vastly superior to having hopeful faith, but because of oppression, you wound up having to flip that coin yet again. This would be the worst case scenario. It could be that God just pops in once every few thousand years, and then because you people have something called free will, after the fiasco this produces you are then abandoned once again to toss coins in the darkness for thousands of years all the while extolling the virtues of hopeful faith (as though such an atrociously stupid idea was actually a virtue of some sort). God would then be back to check up on you again in another couple of thousands years to see if you have learned your lesson, or if you require yet another two thousand years in the gloomiest of dungeons, trapped in the outer darkness while weeping and grinding your teeth.
I find the mind of God to be wonderfully simple and the plans of God to be elegant in their simplicity. Only religion speaks of the supposed ‘divine mysteries of the unknowable god of the dead.'
Now the purpose of this social experiment is to reveal the truth about your society. Oppression is everywhere. In the beginning it is foolish folly and when it becomes mature and full grown it assumes the form of truly wicked madness.
It is also possible to see this an experiment in living theology. We ask the question, ‘is it necessary for someone to die before they can experience resurrection?'
Sexual Inequality
The most fundamental inequality in human society is not economic inequality, but rather sexual inequality. I recall one episode of that Seinfeld show, where Jerry made note of the fact that up to 95 percent of the human race is ‘undatable'. You just would not want to go out on dates with most of the human race.All human elites are phony elites. The aristocracy are phonies. The rich elites and the political elites are all phonies. There is only one true elite on this planet, and that is the young and the beautiful.
It is for this reason that we have economic inequality entrenched into every fiber of our society, just as our ancestors did before us, whether this was in the form of the old Roman slave driving system or the feudal landlord system that followed, or the capitalist system we have today. Old men are not sexy, but there is nothing sexier than a real hard wallet. The alpha male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and as you can see from the devastation that is plainly visible all over this suffering planet, great is the cruelty of his ferocious envy. Cruel oppression is everywhere. That washed up old beta male will stop at nothing to find some place to make a profit and pad his wallet so that he can get laid. This is the true driving force behind global capitalism. It is not really an economic system. It is a system of sexual domination intended to overturn the natural order of things by making old beta males into artificially created alpha males with sexy fat wallets.
Therefore we can see that every form of corruption that exists on this planet is a physical manifestation of the corruption of the flesh. That bible letter writer, Paul, wrote that ‘those who sow to the flesh reap a harvest of corruption.'
One of the problems with this Paul character is that while he could analyze a problem, he suffered from a really stunted imagination as well as a ruinous loss of faith. For you see, if you have a problem with ‘corrupted flesh' the correct solution is not to promote ‘the spirit' and ‘spirituality' but rather to directly address this problem of corrupted flesh. Paul therefore became the pioneer of that religious strategy of avoidance, for spirituality is nothing more than an attempt to avoid the problem, by pushing the solution off into some nether world called ‘heaven'. There is no flesh in heaven, only ghosts live there, and so therefore it must be true that because heaven is very ‘spiritual' heaven must be a perfect place free from corruption.
For those who have no faith, and therefore just glumly accept ‘corrupted flesh' as being the norm, there is spirituality and religion, for it turns out that religion and her spirituality are just manifestations of a total lack of imagination which has its roots in a ruinous lack of living faith. Therefore, since religion has no real solution to the problem of ‘corrupted flesh' and since religion cannot even imagine that there might exist a living solution to this problem of sexual inequality, therefore it is in the nature of religion to propose repression as a solution, and when that does not work, repression can always be followed by oppression, since such oppression of humanity is the only ‘solution' that can ever occurred to that limited mind possessed by the faithless religious.
One good example of this sort of thing is that Muslim practice of hiding every woman under a black sack, for when women are hidden under black sacks, there is no longer any problem with sexual inequality and the problem of the corruption of the flesh is masked. Islam offers no solution to the human condition, and therefore, being a religion after all, it responds with cruel oppression, and tosses a sack over the problem. Under Sharia law an entire society can have itself covered by a black sack, with only a peep hole open so that deeply repressed society can peep out at the world. The problems all remain, but they have been covered with a black sack. This is religion.
Religion is godforsaken because religion is a fraudulent hoax. Dogma and doctrine consist of nothing more than anthropocentric projections of human experience built upon a foundation of ruinous faithlessness, and as such it would be forever impossible for religion ever to please God for as convincing to herself as her doctrines may be, they are nevertheless not divine doctrines nor are her thoughts the thoughts of God, nor are here words the word of God. Religion offers only repression, the product of total faithlessness and the ungodly spirit so typical of those whose only true authentic experience of God is that of pitiless rejection and exile. It turns out that religion without God is impossible, for at the end of it all the fruit that it produces is only a godless faithless mind which is the true inheritance of the ungodly who have religion and not much else.
What I am proposing here is that true salvation is not the salvation of ‘souls' (assuming that such a thing as a ghost that lives inside a flesh shell actually does exist). True salvation is the salvation of the body. This is the meaning of resurrection. Unfortunately resurrection was a meaningless concept to the theologians, and so therefore we were left with doggerel and weird interpretations of the meaning of resurrection. I won't bother repeating that foolish nonsense for I am sure that everyone is assailed relentlessly by the dogmatic interpretations of the evangelists of religion as they carry on in ignorance about the supposed meaning of resurrection (is it not some divine cow sacrifice to pay for sin?)
It is for this reason that I am proposing to treat theology like a science and run an experiment. I already have the preliminary results of that experiment, and I know that this is a real phenomenon and so therefore this is doable. Now I know what you people might think. Oh, so he partially reversed the aging process on some old nose. Big deal. Do you people not think? Who has despised the day of small beginnings?
What I am proposing here is the total destruction of thousands of years of accumulated dogma. I consider that letter writer Paul to be a faithless theological dwarf. Nevertheless, since most of his followers are also as faithless as he is, he achieves psychological resonance and people believe him to be some kind of ‘spiritual giant'. Is it not a sinful flesh? Look at the harvest of the sinful flesh, a harvest of corruption. Does it not therefore logically follow that there exists an undeniable link here between cause and effect? Is not human sexuality sinful? Has not God judged the sinful flesh?
Sexual Morality
If natural human sexuality, which is polygamous, is sinful, then would it not be true that God was disgusting old bastard? After all, bare bums are cute, or at least, they are sometimes cute, perhaps five percent of the time. Granted there is nothing cute about corrupted old backsides, but the nice ones are still cute, are they not? But as we all know, it is the supposed commandment of God that you must not even so much as look at some cute bare bottom, for those who even look at cute backsides are as guilty as those who go the next logical step and hop into the sack to have a good time. This no looking policy is what theologians refer to as the ‘much more advanced spirituality of Jesus.'Now we don't want to piss of the elderly by doing what they can no longer do (unless they are rich old men, and can therefore buy anything they want, including cute young bottoms). Therefore we must throw young Muslim girls under black sacks so that they will be no more attractive than corrupted old Muslim women. Old Muslim women are sexually moral, which is good, for if they were not they might be very bitter old women, but they are not, because they are moral and thus grateful to God and Mohammed and Jesus for the grace shown to them by the wonderful gift of religious spirituality and the salvation from such filthy sexual practices.
I have a question I would like to ask. How long will that religion and all that ‘spirituality' survive when confronted with the resurrection of the body? Who would want to go to heaven when they can go to bed with someone instead? Now, I know, you must be thinking that God, being some kind of a bastard, only wants to use a cute bum as a ‘temptation', this sort of thing being like spiritual callisthenics for souls which become ever more stronger and more fit for ghost heaven the more practice such souls receive in resisting such alluring temptations.
Now what with God being such a miserable old bastard, it should come as no surprise that God has made all those lovely temptations so very very tempting, for a temptation would hardly be a temptation if it was not very tempting. This makes me wonder if all those cured fags out there, who have been cured of faggitry by means of Jesus and the Holy Ghost, nevertheless must deal with temptations. In that case we must assume that if the sight of one of those forbidden little bare bottoms would still turn them on and set off that biochemical biological reaction which would cause them to feel really, really horny, then we must assume that cured fags are not actually cured fags but rather they are religious repressed oppressed fags. Therefore they must ‘resist temptation'.
Now the only reason why we must be careful and resist temptation is that we must be careful not to piss of that 95 percent of the human race who are undatable. For this reason we must wear black sacks or live in boxes with one mate and never, ever look or even think about sex with anyone other than that one mate. Remember, we have a problem here and religion cannot solve the problem, only repress and oppress, and so therefore we have religion preaching ‘sexual morality' and ‘family values'. This sort of thing will have to pass for a solution to that problem of the sinful flesh, for religion is faithless and her giants and her greatest intellects and her leading lights were all unimaginative faithless theological dwarves.
The purpose of my experiment, which I have been instructed to commence, will be to verify whether or not my judgment against that religion is correct, and I should be able to report some results sometime later this year.
Porn Stars
I was reading the ‘Brent Corrigan' blog, and he mentioned something about how himself and some other porn stars spent an evening outside, talking, ‘and looking for UFOs'.Now apparently those porn stars have heard me. I thought I would point out to them that old saying, ‘be careful what you ask for...you might get it.'
It has been said that with great privilege, comes great responsibility. Now consider the history of ‘porn stars', or people with a similar value system, for video is a recent invention. Throughout history they have been the biggest bunch of losers on the planet, and you would find them sneaking around, attempting to escape from the ruthless oppression, or, if they got caught, they would be found getting stoned to death or burned at the stake. Now they may think that they are winning now, but there are disturbing trends in the world. For example the Ukraine has just joined the list of countries criminalizing porn stars, and in Ireland you cannot say anything naughty about religion. Such so called crimes are now punishable by jail terms.
Now I ask you to think back over history and the thousands of years that the human race has spent locked up in a dungeon, which is the true explanation of history, for it was only by locking everyone in a dungeon that God was to have any hope at all of finally getting rid of that erroneous anthropocentric projection known as ‘holy religion'. Next, imagine that, because of ‘free will', the human race once again gets handed over for another two thousand years of gloomy doom in the outer darkness, there to weep and grind their teeth, as they are handed over to the torturers to be once again tortured until they have paid the last cent. Yes, God really is a cruel bastard.
Now the point that I am trying to make here is that when a porn star goes looking for a UFO then a porn star runs the risk of becoming very responsible, and will inevitably become like Atlas, groaning under the crushing weight of the whole world on his shoulders. Think of the little children being forced to get born in that dreadful dungeon, and then to experience that less than lovely experience of rotting away in their flesh long before they are finally planted six feet under and the last bit of that decay and rotting finally takes place once and for all.
Yes, it is heavy. It doesn't come upon you all at once. It sneaks up on you, and it grows and grows. Maybe you have plans. Things you thought you would be doing. In five years you will be here. In ten years you will be there. Then suddenly you begin to feel that crushing weight, the weight of the world crushing down upon you. You have known the truth, and truth did not set you free. It began crushing you and crushing you, pressing down upon you.
Believe me, I know what I am talking about here. It becomes an all consuming passion, until nothing else in the world matters anymore.
Next Page : The Resurrection : Update on the Experimental Results