Matthew Index





Matthew's editorial deletions
of Mark's criticism of Mary


Matthew's editing of Mark's gospel


Episodes from Mark's Gospel that were deleted in Matthew's edited versionMatthew's deletion of Mark's chiastic critique of Yeshua's mother

     The gospel of Matthew shows evidence of familiarity with the gospel account given in Mark's gospel, as does the gospel of Luke (the author was familiar with both Matthew's account and the gospel of Mark). Matthew's gospel closely follows the schema of the gospel of Mark, picking up on Mark's account from about chapter seven onward. Such close correspondence could not be coincidental. Even more interesting is the fact that Matthew does not follow Mark's arrangement given in Mark chapters 1 to 6. In these chapters Mark's chiasmus contain a sequence of particularly strong attacks on the Torah and on the family of the Messiah, and these chiastic structures are broken apart in Matthew's version. That Matthew would then begin following the exact of ordering of Mark's gospel for the rest of the manuscript is a pretty clear indication that Mark had priority, and that Matthew intentionally diluted the chiasmus found in the first six chapters of the gospel of Mark for theological reasons (Matthew's approach to the Torah is more moderate than the radical rejection of Mark, and the author proposes instead an approach of ‘moderate reform' of the Torah, so the deletions in this case are hardly coincidental given the ideology of the later author.)

     Almost every verse in Mark's gospel is reproduced in Matthew's version with a few notable exceptions (whereas only half of Mark's gospel is reproduced in the gospel account known as Luke). In both cases, Matthew and Luke exclude material from Mark's earlier account for theological reasons.

     One obvious example of this sort of thing is found in considering Mark's version of the gathering of the disciples on the mountaintop. According to Mark, the disciples gathered on the mountain, were assigned their various tasks, ‘and then he (Yeshua) went home.' When his family heard about his activities they attempted to seize him and have him incarcerated in what must have passed for an institution for the mentally disturbed in those days, for his family said, ‘he has lost his mind.' Now Mark uses chiasmus to make points in the gospel (juxtaposing verses and stories, arranging verses in counter-positions in step like structural arrangements, so that, in order to understand the full meaning of the gospel it is required that one recognize and appreciate the structural form adopted by the author). In this case Mark balances this story of his families attempt capture of Yeshua on account of his ‘mental illness' with two other related parables. In one parable, after he escapes capture, he tells his disciples, ‘who is my mother? Who are my brothers? My mother and my brothers are those who do the will of God.' The implication is that his mother and his brothers did not do the will of God, and this rejection needs to be understood, embedded within the structure of Mark's account, as a rejection of his family for their unwillingness to ‘do the will of God' (as evidenced just previously by their attempt to arrest Yeshua). The point is driven home in another chiastic structure wherein Yeshua raises the dead and immediately once again is rejected by his family whose powerful unbelief causes him to lose his powers to heal leaving him amazed by their ‘unbelief'. No prophet is ever accepted by his own family, he tells his disciples.

     Now the first deletion that takes place in both Matthew and Luke's account is the removal of the attempted arrest of Yeshua by his mother and his brothers on the grounds of insanity. This deleted episode will naturally enough be out of place in both the Matthew and Luke account (and would also not fit comfortably into the gospel of John either). In all three of these accounts Mary knew that her son was the Messiah all along, having been chatting with angels in the gospel of Luke after all, and ‘treasuring' his godly deeds in her heart as he grew up, fully aware of his godlike status. In John's gospel, before Yeshua even begins preaching Mary is after him to perform godly miracles. The line about ‘no prophet being honored by his own family or in his hometown remains in these later accounts, but with the account of the attempted arrest having been deleted, Mark's chiasmus commentary is disrupted and the later gospels reproduce the line without the original context found in Mark's account of Yeshua's relationship with his family.

     According to Mark's account, Yeshua met his disciples on the mountain, gave them their instructions, and then ‘he went home' only to face attempted arrest by his family. Matthew deletes this account of the arrest, and also uses to opportunity of the mountain top visit to introduce some new material not found in Mark's gospel. Far from assigning duties to his disciples and then ‘going home' (only to face arrest) Matthew has Yeshua launch into the famous sermon on the mount. The assignment of duties to the disciples will be moved to a later chapter, after the interpolation of the sermon on the mount.

"And he went up on the mountain, and called to him those whom he desired; and they came to him. And he appointed twelve, to be with him, and to be sent out to preach ... (At this point he assigns tasks to the disciples, and chooses the twelve) ... Then he went home ... And when his family heard it, they went out to seize him, for people were saying, "He has lost his mind." Mark chapter 3 verse 13

"Seeing the crowds, he went up on the mountain, and when he sat down his disciples came to him. And he opened his mouth and taught them, saying:" Matthew chapter 5 verse 1 (the sermon on the mount follows, and the assignment of duties to the disciples is found in chapter 10)

     Most of what you find in Matthew chapters 5 to 7 does not appear in Mark's gospel, with the exception of a few teachings that are found scattered in various chapters of Mark's account. Matthew concludes the Sermon with a line borrowed from Mark's account "they were astonished at his teaching"

     While Matthew reproduces Mark's line about a prophet being rejected by his family (and also reproduces the line ‘who is my mother...my mother is those who do the will of God') by deleting Mark's story of the attempted arrest of Yeshua by his mother and brothers Matthew strips the meaning of these lines out of the context they were given in Mark's gospel and renders them meaningless. This disturbance of chiasmus in Mark's gospel is a recurring feature in Matthew's account, when, for theological reasons, Matthew (and Luke as well) do not like certain ideological features of the earlier Mark account.





Matthew Index     Bible Commentary     HOME







A Unified Field Theory

 failed_gravity_theory.gif - 10361 Bytes



The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.










Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs


A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.

Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.

Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).


A Theological Experiment

My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came out of nowhere.

I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’, since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing authority figures which requires the creation of artificial hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being elevated to the status of absolute dogma.

There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent. Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet, and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.

The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza. No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is full of ruinous destruction for it.

We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.

Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the high crime of ‘ant genocide’.

Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or whether they would not.

When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark patch on the side in the photograph below.





I documented my experiment on these pages. one two t hree four fi ve six


I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves, and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his beautiful colorful tail.


Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was something wrong with the people on this planet.