INDEX


Common practice for Ranchers to hide Mad Cow disease


In one of the most amazingly blunt interviews I have ever heard, an Alberta rancher has just been interviewed on CBC defending Ralph Klein's 'shoot, shovel, and shut up' description of dealing with mad cow disease...a rough transcript of this remarkable interview follows...

Background -
Canadian Premier's comments increase the confidence in the testing and safety of Canadian Beef. (He suggested that ranchers should shoot mad cows, bury them, and then not tell anyone...)

Canadian beef is currently embargoed due to a case of Mad Cow Disease discovered in Alberta. In a comment made to the Western Governors council in Montana, as reported on the CBC site, Alberta Premier Ralph Klein made the suggestion that the whole problem could have been avoided if the rancher had simply buried the mad cow. He said the rancher who owned the cow "knew nothing about cattle ranching," then added: "I guess any self-respecting rancher would have shot, shoveled and shut up," rather than ship the sickly animal for slaughter. Montana ranchers considered the comments to be 'irresponsible' and Klein issued an apology later, saying ""I did not, nor would I ever, counsel anyone to break the law by not reporting a suspected case of BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy). Nor did I intend to insult the rancher who owned the diseased cow, or the ranching industry in general."

While he is being roasted in the media, no doubt a lot of Alberta beef ranchers are in full agreement with what he said (wink nod) and with his encouragement, no doubt will begin doing everything they can to hide mad cow disease from the public in the future so a scandal like the present one never happens again. Let's hope he meant it as some kind of crude joke, but it really was a stupid thing to be saying - even if it might be what a lot of ranchers are thinking...

and if that thought doesn't increase your confidence in the integrity and safety of beef I don't know what would...

interview on CBC
A rancher named Livingston is being interviewed on behalf of Alberta Ranchers...

I am typing as fast as I can trying to keep up with this remarkable interview with a Canadian rancher...

the general practice is to destroy the sick cattle at the ranch and bury them. We do not send sick cows to town. If its obviously sick, and the cow doesn't get up, and is not going to recover, you don't need an expert. You don't need to bother anyone from town. Take care of the problem yourself. Ralph Klein tells is like it is. (Shoot, shovel, and shut up). the Rancher is outraged that Klein is catching hell for his common sense comments.

The rancher then insists that science is wrong and mad cow disease is not a problem. People don't get sick from eating BSE infected cattle. If we did more science we would find that out. If the rancher had taken care of his cow on his own ranch no one would have known about the BSE. No sick cow should ever be taken to town.He then insists that people are making to big a deal about Ralph Klein's comments. he was speaking to ranchers that time and all ranchers know that you should just bury sick cows. Ranchers know very well that this 'shoot, shovel, and bury' practice is done every where by ranchers in both canada and the United States, he said. klein was just telling them what they already know. Whether you bury the cow depends on how sick the cow looks and whether or not it can stand up and still walk. The health system of canada's cows is best taken care of by ranchers who just shoot their own cows and take care of the health of Canada's cows themselves. There's no need to bring in some expert. Canada's ranchers are the ones who best know when a cow is to sick to take to town and thus needs to be shot and buried.

The reporter then asked, "Its common practice for Ranchers to shoot and bury cows, and no testing is done by experts to determine if the cow was infected. How can we reassure people that Canada has no more mad cows, given that this is the common practice."

The rancher replied, All the sick looking cows stay home, or get shot. The cattle that are put in the food chain are inspected. We haven't got BSE except for one cow, and it only got picked up because that cow got taken to town. If he hadn't taken that cow to town no one would know. He probably wouldn't do it again, now that he knows what will happen, but they aren't mad at him for taking that cow to town.

that has to be the most amazing interview I have ever heard...by the way...I am not making this up...it was on the CBC at around 12:35 central time, September 18, 2003



Previous stories
Mad Cow disease mimics the symptoms of Alzheimers, and the only way to be sure of the presence of CJD is to take a section of the brain and examine it under the microscope after death (there is currently no way to diagnose CJD based on a blood test). According to the Alzheimers association, "One in 10 persons over 65 and nearly half of those over 85 have AD. A small percentage of people as young as their 30's and 40's get the disease." They have a fact sheet on 'Early Onset Alzheimers'...The Wisconsin Mad Deer Kill

The Spin of the day site featured a mad cow story that originally appeared in USA today... MAD COW USA? YOUNG CJD DEATHS SEEM ON THE RISE which stated that "unfortunately the US government refuses to provide sufficient research funding, refuses to adequately test livestock for TSE agents, refuses to ban the feeding of slaughterhouse waste to livestock, and will not require mandatory reporting of CJD cases..."...Mad Cow U.S.A.

Links

Inside the Mad Cow Plant: a Worker Speaks Out

http://www.mad-cow.org/

Mad cow disease spread to wildlife through feeding programs that incorporate livestock by products...as well deer are fed the ground up carcasses of road killed deer and elk etc...

http://www.maddeer.org/

Mad Cow U.S.A.



First report of American dying of Mad Cow disease


When it rains it pours. Just as controversy is swirling over revelations that ranchers are covering up mad cow disease, the first report of an American dying of mad cow disease has just come to light...

Man with Mad Cow Disease may be first in US linked to eating meat.
September 17th, 2003
Peter Putnam is dying of vCJD - Mad Cow Disease, and doctors say his case fits the profile of those in the UK who contracted the disease by eating bad meat. If that is the case, there is a good chance it came from eating beef, as Mr Putnam (before he became ill) told his brother last summer he tried venison for the first time. This would not have been enough time for the disease to manifest itself from an animal infected with Chronic Wasting Disease, narrowing the options for where he would have came into contact with the disease.

Farmer should have covered up mad cow, Klein says
Alberta Premier Ralph Klein has taken aim at the owner of the province's infamous mad cow, saying a "self-respecting" rancher would not have taken the animal to slaughter but instead would have simply "shot, shovelled and shut up."



A miracle


there have been previous mad cow human deaths in the U.S. and Canada but these have been blamed on the highly infected deer, elk, and buffalo

miraculously, the nations cows have remained pristine and immune in the midst of the continent wide epidemic of mad cow infecting these other ruminants

have a nice day


U.S. Government bans sick cattle from food chain

Mad Cow Disease

Peak Oil, Mad Cow Disease, and September 11th...connecting the dots

INDEX






A Unified Field Theory

failed_gravity_theory.gif - 10361 Bytes



The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file ->
unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.







Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs



A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.

Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.

Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).


A Theological Experiment

My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came out of nowhere.

I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’, since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing authority figures which requires the creation of artificial hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being elevated to the status of absolute dogma.

There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent. Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet, and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.

The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza. No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is full of ruinous destruction for it.

We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.

Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the high crime of ‘ant genocide’.

Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or whether they would not.

When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark patch on the side in the photograph below.





I documented my experiment on these pages. one two t hree four fi ve six


I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves, and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his beautiful colorful tail.


Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was something wrong with the people on this planet.