INDEX
Martin Luther King, Liberator
There could not be one American who is not familiar with Martin, especially since he has his own holiday now, which means that everyone gets to take a day off, which helps to remind everyone in the country and get them thinking about Martin Luther King, something which, you might recall, really pissed off the capitalists of America, whose argument against giving Martin his own holiday was that it would be one more day off work, and thus result in lost productivity for America in the globalized market place, which as you are always reminded, is a new reality these days and with its tough challenges ahead, means that Americans really can't have unions and perhaps they should scale back their pensions as well, this globalization apparently being some evil and atrocious thing which results in all this damage, and it also means that they should not take a holiday for Martin Luther King, because the rest of the globe doesn't, thus resulting in America falling behind one day on the the rest of planet, which could prove hard to make up later, unless they agree to work one Sunday perhaps later on in the year to make up for it.
This being a good example of the ridiculous depths to which capitalists propaganda has sunk in America, something which slowly, and gradually as times goes by, gets people more and more pissed off all the time, as the Democrats found out late last year, when, suddenly, half way through that ridiculous offensive campaign of theirs they forced a robot candidate to insincerely repeat the results of the polls, which said that Americans were more than extremely pissed off at the Democrats, thus causing that candidate to promise some kind of vague health care, provided that, once he got in and had a chance to look at the books, it was economically feasible. So then while the Democrats tried some really inept populism at the tail end of that disaster they called a campaign they were not really ready to piss off that capitalist by committing themselves to anything specific, but nevertheless needing to make a very sudden and confusing u-turn in that campaign, apparently having started out thinking Americans wanted more war on terrorism, being just that out of touch with reality it woudl seem. To understand this one must comprehend the blindness of arrogant hubris that comes with power, which defiantly pitches out shit until met with some genuine rage, which is the only time you would ever see such a sudden detour, that having come as a bit of surprise, too, by the way, as you could tell by the way it played out.
Martin took a bullet because he was this black Christian minister who decided to see if maybe it might not be possible to perhaps ask a capitalist for some change for a cup of coffee and a sandwich. For making this very modest and small demand it has been said that Martin Luther King was no radical. And I am sure he was criticized for being no radical while he was alive as well, by those who kept telling him to take a hurry up and take a bullet instead of dragging that process of taking a bullet out for such a long time. For it turns out that if Martin had been a radical as people sometimes expected him to be, in order to be thorough, then he would have taken a bullet for sure, for we now that being no radical but a moderate he just wound up taking a bullet later because of that business about the sandwich, and I imagine if he would scaled back to a cup of coffee he probably would have still taken a bullet but it might have taken another year or two to happen.
Which isn't saying much for capitalists, or capitalism in general, which, along with that racists IMF and World Bank racist mumbo jumbo about the third world needing 'reforms', instead of liberation and justice, probably best explains why capitalists were pissed off about giving a holiday to Martin, although all that other stuff I already mentioned probably made them mad as well.
While it may not be the case that Martin was a radical, he was without any doubt, a true Christian minister, and not one of those quacks and frauds people have so much trouble putting up with and tolerating as they persistently try to destroy the country, pollute the courts even more than they already are, and so on. Martin was the cross carrying Christian, and at the end, when it came time for him to either keep carrying that cross or maybe put it away, he thought it over, and decided to be a Christian and carry that cross over the finish line. Who can ever forget that most stirring image where Martin Luther King told that vast crowd just shortly before he was gunned down, that he wasn't going to be going with them, and that they would have to carry on alone, and the crowd shouted out 'Np, no' and he lifted his hands and waved them to keep silent while shaking his head, 'no, no, no.' He knew it was time for him to be going and he went. And in a country like America with far to much deeply offensive hypocritical mumbo jumbo and nonsense about 'crosses', which is impossible to decipher because it confused theological drivel that means nothing, it is worth taking a day off for Martin Luther King, to think about that bullet and that cross and true courage, thus getting away from racism over time because of the power of that cross that minister was carrying, which is why he did not stop, but kept going. Because he knew.
And so therefore, in the grand sweep of history, as time goes by, it will become clearer that while Martin Luther King may not have been the radical, he was a liberator of the cruelly oppressed third world, because when he took a bullet, so did racism, and the brutality and theft meted out to the now ruined and impoverished third world has always been based upon racism, and such loathesome conduct cannot continue without that cover story, suddenly being revealed as loathesome rather than some kind of struggle or difficult uphill battle against great odds, which is the usual shit and drivel used as a cover story for the brutal oppression of the third world.
Which leads me to the discussion of something really scary, which is that, believe it or not, America has Christians, even if you don't see them on the airwaves, the airwaves being dominated by people who talk about crosses, usually in a way that makes no damned sense whatsoever, since they don't understand anything, being religious rather than Christians, which is fatal.
And the fact that America has Christians is a scary realization, if you stop to think about it, well, depending on who you are.
Now I know that capitalists are mad now, because they don't want to loose that big piece of pie to the Bolivians as one example, thus setting a bad precendent for how you really develop a country, which is to make sure not to get robbed by a capitalist or else you will wind up flat broke and in a third world state, which is the argument being made by the 'Bolivian people, by the way, in case you did not know, and is just simple common sense. So then you have a clear choice of giving pie to a capitalist, as though a capitalist needed pie, having a freezer full as it is, or giving justice to the third world.
Yes, I have been listening, and I know that capitalists are more than angry now, some of them in any case are breathing fire and making the most hair raising threats of brutal oppression, for example on thing I heard lately was the one about how because of the London bombing it is now required that there be no more free speech, or else a muslim might preach Islam, leading that capitalist to set off another bomb, this time in America, for as the American capitalist media is reminding us, a bombing is 'inevtiable' in America (end quote) which probably means that it is, given that Americans don't need free speech, or one must assume, perhaps a muslim, or even worse Christian ministers around the nation might preach sermons that would then lead to terror.
However, it could be difficult for capitalists to send cops to brutalize churches, troublesome churches who are where they shouldn't be when they shouldn't be there, and so on. I am not saying they are not stupid enough to do something like that, which would be good, you know if they would, when you stop to think about it.
You see, I have been holding a cup to the wall, you might say, and what I have heard has been interesting. Especially in some of those black churches. It seems to be just beginning, although it has to be one hundred per cent certain just how far along it really is, but I can assure you, it is going to be a problem. And that should scare some people who need some scaring, scaring them really good when they think about what that means.
Now I don't know if I am going to take a bullet. Of course I have thought about it, and rolled it around in mind. If I took a bullet, would there ever be trouble. Well that would shorten my trip by I don't how long. If I don't take a bullet it would probably just take longer, which tend to encourage a capitalist to consider taking a chance on that other really really big trouble thing I just mentioned. On balance, I can't decide. I am not like Martin. I don't know. You know they came around last November, and I assumed at the time that I was about to take a bullet just a few days before that time they came around last November, so when they showed up I wasn't surprised. Unfortunately I had company at the time, and when they my company, they decided to go away and not give me a bullet, and I don';t know if there plan was to come back in six or seven months and try again, you know to see if maybe they can catch me alone next time. I guess you would have to ask them about their plans. I am not Martin. I don't know.
I am also not like Martin in that I am carrying what you might call 'cross lite'. If you want to be a great hero and deserve to be one after becoming one you need to be Martin and carry "cross heavy." You can tell that Martin was carrying "cross heavy" because he was not a radical, which meant he really didn't want to go, but at the same time he knew that he had to go, and thus he had to carry "cross heavy/" Which makes him more than a hero.
I am not a hero. Do not confuse someone like me with a hero. Let me tell you about myself. I get up in the morning, put on my socks, grab my cross and put that on, throw on some pants, go and brush my teeth, and then dragging cross lite, maybe make a snack. Do you get the picture. Its called cross lite. You don't even mind putting on your cross lite in the morning because you hardly even know you are carrying a cross because that one is cross lite. When it comes time to reflect on carrying cross lite instead of thinking about whether or not that is something you can bear up under, you wind thinking an analysis, you know whether or not they could be that stupid, trying to judge the odds. But you never think about whether or not you should or shouldn't that not being an issue because it is cross lite.
The really scary thing is that I think I might have managed to talk some black ministers into carrying cross lite, or at least I am led to suspect that I may have pulled that one off, which should really scare the bejesus out of some people, because even one person carrying cross lite is bad enough, and I c
an only imagine how much trouble that is going to be for them when that thing kind of catches on....
INDEX
A Unified Field Theory
The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip
Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.

Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs
A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.
Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.
Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).
A Theological Experiment
My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my
need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of
propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the
Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came
out of nowhere.
I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions
using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it
can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a
theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’,
since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing
authority figures which requires the creation of artificial
hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe
an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions
is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind
that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions
as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being
elevated to the status of absolute dogma.
There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent.
Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet,
and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the
degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force
behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless
oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of
suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the
purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.
The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite
are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha
male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be
found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses
his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive
aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza.
No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found
to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha
male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is
full of ruinous destruction for it.
We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this
reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where
castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw
women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and
is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that
religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.
Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance
and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the
most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is
the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution
to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation
of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for
having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the
high crime of ‘ant genocide’.
Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to
this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I
compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut
off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is
sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in
deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or
whether they would not.
When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So
everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly
sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by
using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed
half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark
patch on the side in the photograph below.

I documented my experiment on these pages. one
two
t
hree
four
fi
ve
six
I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition
is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was
upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of
opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this
experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves,
and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun
shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by
showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his
beautiful colorful tail.
Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific
breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what
ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this
all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was
something wrong with the people on this planet.