INDEX
Jan 11, 2005 : Bush Administration Prepares for an Attack on Iran
There are multiple indicators that point to an upcoming attack on Iran.
Reports have come out that American commandos have been operating in Iran seeking intelligence information for an upcoming attack on Iran by the United States.
Iran rejects US operations claims Iran has dismissed a report in the US media that US commandos are conducting missions on Iranian territory to identify targets for possible strikes.Supreme National Security Council spokesman Ali Aghamohammadi said it would be naive to believe the report, which he called psychological warfare...US President George W Bush says he does not rule out force against Iran...The Pentagon ... has not categorically denied that US troops have been on the ground in Iran...the Teheran Times... dismissed the story as a "ridiculous bluff".It said the US and Israel knew that attacking Iran would be biting off more than they could chew, and would only choke them if they tried it.The paper warned that Iran had acquired massive military might and was prepared to attack any intruder with a fearsome reign of fire and death.
The story provoked a reaction in the Tehran Times.
No country dares to attack Iran due to its deterrent military capabilities: Shamkhani TEHRAN (MNA) -- Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani said on Monday that due to the power of its flexible strategy, Iran has attained military strength such that no country dares to attack it because no country has been able to determine Iran's military might. "We can claim that we have rapidly produced equipment that has resulted in the greatest deterrent," the defense minister added.
Futile espionage TEHRAN (MNA) -- U.S. journalist Seymour Hersh has written in the New Yorker magazine that the Bush administration has been carrying out secret reconnaissance missions in Iran to gather information about the country's nuclear, chemical, and missile sites in preparation for possible air strikes against the Islamic Republic... None of these statements will either embarrass or frighten the Iranian nation. The U.S. and its allies have used all their espionage tricks to obtain information about Iran but have never succeeded and will never succeed in discovering Iran's real military might.It seems that the inability of the U.S. and Israel to glean information about Iran's strategic military capabilities is an endless process. Therefore, the new claim, which is part of the White House's psychological operations against Tehran and which has also not been completely rejected, can only be interpreted as a ridiculous bluff meant to deflect attention from the U.S. failure in regard to Iran... However, issues such as plans to wage a major war against Iran have also been raised. A proverb says: "A barking dog never bites."The United States is well aware that Iran has strongly withstood U.S. pressure for over 25 years, including the actions of U.S. puppet dictator Saddam Hussein.Today, the Islamic Republic has acquired massive military might, the dimensions of which still remain unknown, and is prepared to attack any intruder with a fearsome rain of fire and death.The U.S. always bluffs in its dealings with powerful countries and only has the nerve to challenge weak and feeble regimes that have nothing to defend since they are only puppet governments.The U.S. and Israel know that they can never militarily challenge Iran, since attacking the Islamic Republic would be biting off more than they could chew and would only choke them if they attempted it.
American threats against Iran go back several years.
Bush 'won't tolerate' nuclear armed Iran WASHINGTON - U.S. President George Bush said on Wednesday he and other world leaders would not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons. "The international community must come together to make it very clear to Iran that we will not tolerate construction of a nuclear weapon," Bush said following a cabinet meeting at the White House. "Iran would be dangerous if it had a nuclear weapon."He said nearly all the leaders at the G-8 summit earlier this month agreed they must prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.The White House alleges Iran has an advanced missile program and has ties to terrorist groups.
Israel has also been keen for action against Iran. It is ironic that both the United States, the world's leading producer of Weapons of Mass Destruction, and Israel, the regional producer of WMD in the Middle East, are condemning another nation for supposedly producing the same sorts of weapons.
Iran's nuclear program still a threat: Sharon JERUSALEM - Israel is taking measures to defend itself from Iran because the world is not doing enough to stop it from developing atomic weapons, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Wednesday.Sharon told the Jerusalem Post that "there is no doubt" that Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons.
In recent months the Americans have delivered to Israel bunker busting bombs capable of destroying fortified complexes in Iran. As well, late last year Bush moved bombers carrying nuclear missiles to an area near the northern borders of Iran.
It is worth noting here that the plans for an invasion of Iraq were made back in the 1990s, before ever began even his first term, and we know that almost from the first day in office the Bush administration began planning for an attack on Iraq. Similarly during the first few months in office, during the first term, the Bush administration was busy preparing for war with Afghanistan, and all the war plans and the coalition were in place already by June 2001, months before September 11th. We also know that just recently Bush cleaned house at the intelligence agencies, and is now surrounded by ‘Yes men', who will only give him the intelligence he wants. It would not be the case that the Bush administration is looking for intelligence to justify an attack on Iran, but given the nature of this administration, it would be the case that intelligence is sought to identify targets, and the attack on Iran would be, like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, one of the policy constants of this White House, which follows a predetermined course, with a President who is uninterested in intelligence assessments before determining a course of action. Therefore, one could argue that an attack on Iran would be reckless, or even dangerous, but that won't change anything, since Bush follows his course without deviation.
It surprises me that Bush could be in office for four years, and yet still people do not seem to know him. All the accumulating signs and indicators point to an attack on Iran in the near future, and the fact that Bush is in the White House is the guarantee that such an attack will happen. As for Weapons of Mass Destruction, one might recall the Bush Doctrine, stated during his first administration, wherein he said that if America was faced with a difficult circumstance, the response would be a unilateral nuclear strike by the United States. Therefore, should Bush get in trouble due to an attack on Iran, he will resort to nuclear weapons, which does explain why he has moved his missiles next door to Iran (just in case in the worst case scenario he might need them).
One could expect two strategies to implemented by Bush. The first is obviously an American attack on Iran, using overwhelming air power. According to the new Bush Doctrine, Bush is prepared to use nuclear weapons against Iran, should Iran respond with any thing other than docile subjection to this show of force. Second, we can expect much behind the scenes plotting, as Bush attempts to drive a wedge between the armed forces of Iran and the governing parties, in the hopes of inspiring the armed forces to join with the United States in a coup d'etat in Iran.
Anyone who believes that there will be no hostilities between America and Iran does not know George Bush. The man is just implacable and is following a predetermined course of action, and as those in his administrati
on have discovered, it is next to impossible to prevent Bush from fulfilling his agenda.
INDEX
A Unified Field Theory
The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip
Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.

Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs
A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.
Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.
Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).
A Theological Experiment
My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my
need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of
propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the
Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came
out of nowhere.
I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions
using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it
can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a
theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’,
since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing
authority figures which requires the creation of artificial
hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe
an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions
is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind
that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions
as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being
elevated to the status of absolute dogma.
There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent.
Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet,
and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the
degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force
behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless
oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of
suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the
purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.
The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite
are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha
male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be
found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses
his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive
aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza.
No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found
to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha
male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is
full of ruinous destruction for it.
We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this
reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where
castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw
women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and
is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that
religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.
Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance
and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the
most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is
the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution
to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation
of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for
having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the
high crime of ‘ant genocide’.
Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to
this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I
compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut
off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is
sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in
deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or
whether they would not.
When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So
everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly
sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by
using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed
half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark
patch on the side in the photograph below.

I documented my experiment on these pages. one
two
t
hree
four
fi
ve
six
I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition
is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was
upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of
opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this
experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves,
and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun
shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by
showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his
beautiful colorful tail.
Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific
breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what
ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this
all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was
something wrong with the people on this planet.