PREVIOUS PAGE     INDEX...(text)     NEXT PAGE     HOME


A Spirit of Ungodliness


Is ungodliness 'the rational choice'
The emotional roots of ungodly thinking


     Consider the following scenario. A small baby starves to death in a famine. If there is no God, then everything is now over for that baby. There is no justice, all hope for righteousness is gone forever, as well as that baby. Now there are two possiblities. God could exist, and in that case, there will be justice for that baby, and a future hope. Or God could not exist, in which case all hope for justice and righeousness is gone. A question. Of these two scenarios, which would you prefer?

     Now it is typical to blame God for everything that is wrong with the world. You will hear people say, 'if there was a God, how could it have happened?' Consider the following true scenario. Human beings consume only 10 per cent of the food grown in the world. A further 10 per cent is used in industrial processes. The remaining 80 per cent is consumed by live stock, such as cattle. Livestock consumes 100 grams of plant protein to return 1 gram of animal protein. This is no big secret and the statistics are freely available on the United States Department of Agriculture website, or at the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization website, among other places. Cattle and other live stock eat most of the food the world produces. Meanwhile a small human baby starves to death, and you will often hear talk about 'world over population' being blamed for that baby's death or 'the global world wide food shortage', a related problem, which caused that babies death. It will often be suggested that perhaps sterilization is the best solution to prevent that baby starving problem, given that we are, after all, so hard up for food for humans in this place. These are the things you will hear, but the truth is that there is no global food shortage. So I ask you to consider this scenario, and then tell me, what does it say about the world and our values and what does it say about contemporary expressions of religion?

     Consider the following scenario. Someone is either an atheist or agnostic. They say, 'It would be nice if there was a God, but after living in this place and seeing all the rotten things that happen, all the evil in the world, I am afraid that it seems irrational to me to believe in God. I just can't believe it.' Or someone could be an atheist or agnostic and they could be adamant that there is no God because if there was, that would be awful, right?

     On this site I testify to my faith in the triumph of justice and my ultimate faith in the trustworthiness of Yahweh by testifying to my belief in the former prophecies concerning rain on the desert. There are two ways I can think of that people can react. You could say, 'I don't believe it myself, but more power to you. All the luck in the world. It would be wonderful, if only it could be true. God speed to you...'

     It is often suggested that atheism is 'the most rational choice' and godliness is 'the irrational, emotional choice.' I also constantly experience people who, for reasons of hardness of heart caused by the sins of this world, are adamantly opposed to God. They might as well be adamantly opposed to life for a starving baby, to justice, to peace. It is often suggested that atheism is 'the most rational choice' but when you look at this way, it is not, it is profoundly emotional, and in a strange and crooked way, that, as I observe matters, testifies to the existence of God, for the lack of faith in God is usually found accompanied by a strange unreasonable irrational emotional hostility and a type of personality corruption that I often encounter, being a believer. The spirit of Godliness and the love of God and the yearning for God, these are the noble things, and to have a spirit willing to accept the things of God is the most rational choice. There is nothing 'rational' about hoping that a little starved baby gets no justice, and there is nothing 'rational' about hoping to maintain a corrupt human system that keeps starving babies. There is nothing noble about ungodly thinking and ungodly hoping. Ungodliness brings nothing with it but hardness and ruthlessness and ruin and desecration of the earth, which, along with the unreasoning irrationality of godless thinking and godless hoping, only demonstrates how destructive ungodliness really is.

     Let's play a game. I will pray for rain and the revelation of Yahweh, for starving babies and justice on earth. How should a person respond to this act on my part. You see the logical and quite rational thing to do would be to say, 'God speed to you. I have trouble believing you, but I really do hope that your desert gets rain. More power to you.' It would not be rational to say 'it better not rain. That baby better not rise from the dead and get justice from God.' When you see the massive damage that godlessness has done to this place, the ruin of personalities, the destruction of the entire planet, this is not the justification of godless thinking, but rather its condemnation, and it is also the justification of Yahweh who let this world go to the dogs just to make this very point.

     So I will pray for a rainy desert and while I am doing this you can examine your hearts.

     Day after day, in our society, godless thinking is touted and celebrated. There is an arrogance to ungodliness in our civilization, a self assured conviction that not only is ungodliness that most rational choice, it is also the right and proper choice for human beings to make. Ungodly values are celebrated relentlessly, as our civilization celebrates our freedom from godliness, our new found 'liberation'. The end result of it all turns out to be now that day after day we are told that the highest ideal is perfect flesh, that those who are worthy of the highest honors and the accolades are those who have perfect flesh. I have come to the conclusion at the end of it all, that even though hope in Yahweh is the most noble of choices, the reason it is so unpopular in our culture is not because people like to see babies starve but because from birth they have been culturally conditioned to accept sexual immorality and this has corrupted their hearts and removed them far from God.

     Now I have seen enough and understand enough to know that there is such a thing as sexual immorality. For example, John and Jane are beautiful. They get invited to all the parties, and have to pick and choose their dates to the high school dances and the proms. Judy meanwhile is sitting home listening to that song, 'At Seventeen'. ("I learned the truth at seventeen, that love was meant for beauty queens....") Now the years pass and John is now about 70 pounds overweight, and Jane is grey and wrinkling. No one is pounding down the door for John and Jane anymore, but John is still John and Jane is still Jane. Only their body changed. So you can see sexual immorality at work here, and this is an objective observation, not simply a subjective interpretation. It would seem to me that Yahweh has also been at work, pointing this out to every person who lives, because after all our bodies decay and inherit corruption, and this observation needs to be explained by anyone who claims to be a believer. Here I am employing a Deist argument, based on observation of reality. Nothing exists that was not created by Yahweh, and thus in everything one can find messages from God, and these are not messages that can be faked by the church. They are engraved in the stars and carved into the rocks of the earth, and in this case, we see a message about sexual immorality written in the medium of human flesh.

     There are other examples. For example people get greedy for bodies, and then they seem to lose their ability to feel sympathy or genuine affection for others, their hearts hardening, and then the end product are the behavior patterns I mentioned above (hardness, lack of ability to feel affections for others, back biting, cruel gossiping, treachery, and I have seen people deeply wound those who loved them passionately because they were eager to move on and experience a fresh body, etc.) These are products of pursuing only the 'flesh' and not caring about the person, and it is this ideal that our culture celebrates, calling this form of conduct 'liberation'. (The best evidence that people pursue the flesh and not the person is demonstrated by Yahweh when the flesh decays and people then go off to pursue some younger, fresher flesh. Ask aging female stars in Hollywood about this phenomena. During their heyday, were people really interested in them, or their flesh?) As I noted this preoccupation with flesh (provided it is still fresh) and this lack of concern for persons best explains the corruption of the human personality I mentioned above...It corrupts the human personality, and my Deist interpretation to explain this is that the flesh decays and inherits corruption to mirror this corruption that takes place in the soul when the soul is no longer important but people pursue flesh instead...

     As one of the gospels put it, "your eye is the lamp of your soul. So take care of your eye, because if you are plunged into darkness, how terrible that darkness will be." You want to cultivate your spirit and not your flesh so that you can be full of light instead of the darkness described above.

     So I will pray for a rainy desert and while I am doing this you can examine your hearts.


PREVIOUS PAGE     INDEX...(text)     NEXT PAGE     HOME     EMAIL



< BR>

A Unified Field Theory

 failed_gravity_theory.gif - 10361 Bytes



The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.







Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs


A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.

Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.

Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).


A Theological Experiment

My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came out of nowhere.

I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’, since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing authority figures which requires the creation of artificial hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being elevated to the status of absolute dogma.

There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent. Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet, and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.

The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza. No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is full of ruinous destruction for it.

We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.

Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the high crime of ‘ant genocide’.

Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or whether they would not.

When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark patch on the side in the photograph below.





I documented my experiment on these pages. one two t hree four fi ve six


I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves, and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his beautiful colorful tail.


Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was something wrong with the people on this planet.