PREVIOUS PAGE     INDEX...(text)     NEXT PAGE     HOME


ARE UFOs RIDICULOUS?


Do reports of UFO sightings describe craft
that violate the laws of physics?


      Are UFOs ridiculous?

      Today (October 14th, 2000, as I am writing this) while I was posting the reader feedback to this site, I read over an announcement of discussions of spacecraft propulsion being held in the near future at JPL, and I began to recall certain comments made by Carl Sagan in one of his books. According to Sagan, UFOs were obviously ridiculous and mythological because the reports of the craft always described them as violating the laws of physics. As well, most of those reporting such objects were untrained observers and were often found to be ‘nutty' as well.

      Now those of you who have read my story page will know that I am one of those ‘nutty' untrained observers, and those who have viewed the animation files posted on that page will understand how I, and others, could have easily have been fooled when seeing such things, and mistake them for a UFO. Those who have visited my Newspaper gif page will also know that among the other untrained observers of these craft were RCM Police officers and EMO officers, a good part of the population of the town of Melville, and not just myself (as I keep telling people, these events were community events and not just the lone reports of one single lone nutcase like myself).

      Are UFOs ridiculous? Do they violate the laws of physics? According to Sagan ‘our engine to the stars is, and will always be, the Newtonian rocket engine.' This type of engine shoots fire out the backside and, employing the Newtonian law of action with an equal and opposite reaction, the craft will then be propelled forward. Sagan noted that UFOs are reported to float in the air, and also move about without spewing out fires, and thus are obviously not employing a Newtonian rocket engine, and thus were obviously impossible, violating the laws of physics.

      I described objects that had a phosphorescent glow, like those glow in the dark toys (this was a distinctive kind of light, and very recognizable.) This type of material gathers and stores light energy, and then releases it slowly over a period of time. Now this type of phosphorescent material is a natural solar battery, and so we can assume then that the objects are ‘solar powered' using only some of the light energy they capture to illuminate the craft and storing the rest as electrical energy.

      A few years ago I watched as a magnetic disc was levitated off the ground in an experiment. Using the principle of magnetism, the disc was accelerated, lifted off the pad, and then hung motionless in the air, floating over the pad. First point. Objects floating in the air do not violate the principles of physics. This assertion by Sagan was false. Second, there are other ways to accelerate objects than by employing a Newtonian rocket engine. This assertion by Sagan was also false. The flotation of this object was achieved using ‘electro-magnetism'. There is an intimate connection between electricity and magnetic fields, and there is also a not very well understand relationship between gravity and magnetism (the graph of an object following into a gravity well and the graph of an object falling into a magnetic field are identical). The earth, the sun, and other planetary bodies are giant magnets. The idea that some type of craft could generate electrical energy and then employ the principle of magnetic attraction and repulsion to accelerate and hover a craft are not ‘ridiculous' nor are they violations of the principle of physics. The science behind them is at present simply unknown (on this planet).

      Objects in such a field experience ‘anti-gravity' and this idea is hardly unknown either, and as I mentioned the relationship between gravity and magnetism is not yet well understood. Now that a craft could glow in the dark, or float motionless in the air, or suddenly accelerate, none of this violates any known principles of physics. But there are those sudden accelerations, and those sudden right angle turns. Anyone who saw the movie ‘Space Balls' will recall how the space craft went to warp speed, and one of the characters flew across the room and got plastered against the far wall of the ship. Now I will report that I have seen these objects made sudden changes in direction, and I have also seen them accelerate upwards and disappear to a pin point in just a matter of seconds (compare this to the space shuttle that takes several minutes to reach space). Now having seen this myself, I know that somehow that can be done without violating the laws of physics, but it was one thing that I saw that I could not explain.

      A few years ago I watched an amazing demonstration reported on CNN. A scientist placed a frog into a magnetic field, and then the frog began floating in mid-air as though it were in outer space. As I mentioned there is an not well understood relationship between gravity and magnetism (or is it becoming understood, but is top secret?) It has always been a principle of magnetism that magnets only operate on materials subject to magnetism. A frog is not subject to magnetism, and yet a frog experienced ‘anti-gravity' and floated in mid-air. This old truism about magnets has obviously now been proved false. (By the way, just to prove that this anti-gravity effect does not just work on frogs, the scientist also floated a white rat, and some other small animal that I can't remember.)

      And this leads me to speculate about the nature of the relationship of gravity to magnetism and its application to sudden acceleration and changes of directions I have observed these UFOs making. If it is possible to isolate (a frog for example) from the effects of gravity then it should be possible to isolate that same frog from the effects of g-forces. Since it seems obvious that UFOs use both electrical energy and electro-magnetism to achieve flight and acceleration (defying gravity in the process) it should also be possible to use the same magnetic effects to isolate that frog from the effects of the g-forces involved in sudden acceleration. It then remains to prove the case by sending a frog out into space at great speeds, making a few of those sudden right angle turns in the process, and then bring that frog back safely to the earth. We will then know all the basic principles needed to mimic the flight performance of these space craft I have been describing. Based on that amazing demonstration of frog floating I saw on CNN we are actually much closer than we might think.

      So are UFOs ridiculous. Certainly not. I would welcome any critiques or any additional suggestions from readers that would help me to strengthen the points I am making in this essay.

      I received a URL. I surfed over to the site and watched an mpeg of a floating frog, and so I post the URL he sent me here:

http://www.geocities.com/fusniakr/levitate.htm

The URL to the mpeg (about 1.5 megabytes) -> Floating Frog Mpeg.

There are also links at the site to a usenet discussion of the frog floating experiement.



For an update on the unusual visit my
Sahara 'eagle wing' page
for an example of prophecy fulfilled
or my Eden Watch page
for prophecy yet to come...
for more recent developments involving
UFOs see my Message to space shuttle crew
or my Prophecy page
or my page describing personal experiences with UFOs and 666 or a page describing a devil haunting a house...




PREVIOUS PAGE     INDEX...(text)     NEXT PAGE     HOME     EMAIL



< BR>

A Unified Field Theory

 failed_gravity_theory.gif - 10361 Bytes



The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.







Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs


A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.

Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.

Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).


A Theological Experiment

My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came out of nowhere.

I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’, since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing authority figures which requires the creation of artificial hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being elevated to the status of absolute dogma.

There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent. Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet, and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.

The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza. No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is full of ruinous destruction for it.

We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.

Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the high crime of ‘ant genocide’.

Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or whether they would not.

When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark patch on the side in the photograph below.





I documented my experiment on these pages. one two t hree four fi ve six


I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves, and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his beautiful colorful tail.


Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was something wrong with the people on this planet.