INDEX




The genealogy of Christ


Internal inconsistencies revealed
in the gospel of Matthew


      In the opening chapters of the book, the gospel of Matthew attempts to tie Joshua to Jewish history by creating a genealogy divided into segments of fourteen, starting from Abraham.

"So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ fourteen generations." (Matthew Chapter 1 verse 17)

      The obvious point being made here is that Christ came at just the right time, thus making all those fourteens turn out just perfect. The only problem here is that if you consult the book of Chronicles, you will see that the author changes the geneology and drops a number of names, when it is convenient, in order to get those fourteens to turn out right. So someone proved to be quite nimble in the use of scriptures, even from the very first chapter of the book. (This is one of the reasons that Matthew's genealogy conflicts with the genealogy found in the gospel of Luke, which, by the way starts from ‘Adam', not Abraham, because Luke is concerned with showing that Christ was ‘savior of all humanity' and ‘son of Adam, son of God' and is not concerned with ‘the Jews only,' which is one ideological outlook found in Matthew's gospel.) Chronicles lists 18 names, where the Matthew genealogy drops 4 and only lists 14. Compare, starting at 1 Chronicles Chapter 3 verse 10 with Matthew's genealogy starting at Matthew Chapter 1 verse 6.This is not the only example of conflicting genealogies in the Bible.

      The falsified genealogy that opens the book of Matthew is an interesting enigma. (For more information on the problems such genealogy introduce see the page on chronological problems in the Bible comared in chart form to Matthew's genealogy or the page on conflicting genealogy of the Bible. In Matthew's version of the lineage of the messiah we are told that Christ was descended from both Rahab the harlot (a Gentile in Jericho) and Ruth the Moabite (another Gentile). In other parts of the book we are told that Gentiles are dogs and also that the Torah, which also condemns Gentiles, is infallible, perfect, and without error, right down to the last dot over the last letter 'i'. The genealogy is obviously false in many ways (the story of Rahab the harlot is separated by a lot more than just a generation from that of the time of Ruth). It is interesting to note that the author of this genealogy mentions men, which is characteristic of all other Bible genealogies, and then makes a point of mentioning a harlot and a (supposedly eternally cursed) Moabite woman. This brings the geneology into conflict with the portrayal of Gentile women as dogs later in the gospel (and introduces moral hypocrisy, in that Christ, was descended from Gentile dog women, then had the hypocritical nerve to snub them as dogs. It makes no sense.) The function of this genealogy and the time of its composition remains mysterious to me, but it obviously could not have been composed by the same groups who rejected David and rejected gentiles and considered Gentiles dogs, and held the Bible to be 'infallibly inerrant' (that the author of this genealogy falsified the Bible in more ways than one is obvious on consideration of that genealogy, and so a mind set of Biblical inerrancy is out as far as that author was concerned - the genealogy was obviously a polemic of some kind.) I bring to mind just to point out to the reader just how complex the Matthew manuscript proves to be on examination.


The Campaign to Impeach George W. Bush
Click here for more information


Background Material
about Matthew's gospel


The racist origins of the Christmas myth

The origins of the Virgin Birth story

Was Christ a god incarnate? Differing view points in the Church Testament.

Gentile dogs in Matthew's gospel. The Canaanite and Syro-Phoenician dog parables.

Samaritans, a Roman Centurion and Jews in Matthew's gospel. Was Christ sent to the Jews only?

Contradictions on Torah reform in the Gospel of Matthew.

Moral hypocrisy in Matthew's gospel.


Why the Matthew community
of Jewish believers found it
necessary to insist that Christ
was born of a virgin


Did the prophet Isaiah predict the virgin birth of Christ?

Was Jesus Christ the Son of David or the Son of God?

Virgin birth? Son of David or Son of God?


PREVIOUS PAGE     INDEX...(text)      HOME     NEXT PAGE     EMAIL




A Unified Field Theory

 failed_gravity_theory.gif - 10361 Bytes



The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.




Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs


A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.

Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.

Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).


A Theological Experiment

My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came out of nowhere.

I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’, since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing authority figures which requires the creation of artificial hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being elevated to the status of absolute dogma.

There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent. Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet, and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.

The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza. No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is full of ruinous destruction for it.

We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.

Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the high crime of ‘ant genocide’.

Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or whether they would not.

When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark patch on the side in the photograph below.





I documented my experiment on these pages. one two t hree four fi ve six


I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves, and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his beautiful colorful tail.


Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was something wrong with the people on this planet.