C++ Index

Delphi Index



Passing variables by reference of value in C++

Translating C++ Code into Delphi Pascal


In Delphi it is possible to pass a local copy of a variable when calling a procedure or a function, and it is also possible to pass the actual variable itself.  

For example the following code passes a local copy of the integer variable 'amount' to a procedure...]

procedure TForm1.PassAnInt;
var amount : integer;
begin
   amount := 10;
   ChangeInt(amount);
   showmessage(IntToStr(amount));
end;

procedure TForm1.ChangeInt(amount : integer);
begin
   amount := 22;
end;

When showmessage executes 'amount' is shown to be equal to 10 (the variable 'amount' in the second procedure was working on a second copy of a variable also named 'amount' which was in scope only while the ChangeInt function was executing.  Because amount was passed to the procedure by value the original value of amount remains unchanged.  However there are other ways to pass variables which would actually change the orginal variable 'amount'.  For example by using the 'var' key word in the procedure definition this indicates to the compiler that the variable is to be passed 'by reference' (rather than 'by value').

procedure TForm1.ChangeInt(var amount : integer);

In this case when the showmessage procedure executes 'amount' now causes the display of the value of 22.  The actual variable was changed and no local copy was made, because a reference to the actual variable being passed was sent to the procedure as a pointer to its location in memory.  Note that this would work no matter what name was given to the variable in the procedure or function declaration...

procedure TForm1.ChangeInt(var anyname : integer);

In this example the anyname would be set to 22, and once again 'amount' would be displayed as having the value 22, since the var statement in the header indicates that a pointer to the original variable is to be created, so that the procedure or function actually changes the original value.  This is a feature often used in API functions as a way of returning more than one result from a function (while the function returns a result in the usual way, the inclusion of pointers in the header declaration results in multiple results being returned in these variables as well).

It also makes sense then that another way to alter an original variable or a set of variables is to pass actual pointers to these variables to a function or procedure, and in this case, since the pointer  is pointing to the actual memory locations of these variables any changes made to them in another function is going to change the original values.  Passing a pointer to a variable is thus the same as using the 'var' keyword in the function header as illustrated above.

procedure TForm1.PassAPointer;
var
 amount : integer;
 intPtr : ^integer;
begin
  amount := 10;
  intPtr^ := amount;
  ChangeInt(intPtr);
  showmessage(IntToStr(amount));
end;

procedure TForm1.ChangeInt(apointer : ^integer);
begin
  apointer^ := 22;
end;

In the above example the procedure ChangeInt acts like a function by 'returning a value' (because it was passed a pointer to the variable amount it actually alters the value of amount when the object pointed to by the pointer is set equal to 22).

Passing by reference (using either a pointer or the var declaration in the header) makes sense if you want to return multiple values from a procedure or function, or when the objects being passed are quite large, such as strings, graphics, or objects (a local copy of these large data structures need not be made which is quicker and also a more efficient use of memory).

There is syntax in C++ that resembles the 'var' statement in Delphi and produces the same result (rather than creating a local copy of a variable being passed the original is used).  The ampersand is used in the function or procedure declaration to indicate that the address of the variable is being passed rather the value contained by the variable - in otherwords a reference to the variable is being passed, the equivalent to passing a pointer, which, after all, just contains the address of the variable.  In C++ this would look like this...

void ChangeInt(int& amount)
  {
  amount = 22;
  }

The keyword 'void' indicates that this routine returns no value (in otherwords it is a procedure, since functions return a value).  The ampersand indicates that the variable 'amount' refers to a variable being passed by reference, so as in the Delphi example above, this variable will actually be set to the value 22.

Records (or structures as they are called in C++) can also be passed by reference and in the API this method would be the typical case, since often structures are quite large.

void DoChanges(arecord& MyRecord)
   {

   ...all the program code here will alter the fields in 'MyRecord', which was passed by reference and so refers to the actual address of the original record...

   }


Previous page - Pointers, the stack, and the heap     Next page - File I/O

C++ to Delphi Index      Delphi Index



A Unified Field Theory

failed_gravity_theory.gif - 10361 Bytes



The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file ->
unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.






Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs



A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.

Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.

Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).


A Theological Experiment

My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came out of nowhere.

I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’, since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing authority figures which requires the creation of artificial hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being elevated to the status of absolute dogma.

There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent. Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet, and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.

The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza. No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is full of ruinous destruction for it.

We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.

Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the high crime of ‘ant genocide’.

Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or whether they would not.

When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark patch on the side in the photograph below.





I documented my experiment on these pages. one two t hree four fi ve six


I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves, and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his beautiful colorful tail.


Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was something wrong with the people on this planet.