INDEX

The Campaign to Impeach George W. Bush
Click here for more information





DID MOSES
WRITE THE TORAH
IN THE BIBLE?

The evidence that Moses did not write the Torah
taken from the Pentateuch


Authors unknown


     Who wrote the Torah in the Bible. An examination of the Torah indicates that it was composed by a number of now unknown authors. If Moses wrote the Bible then it must be explained why Torah books are in conflict with each other on points of both doctrine and history, something easy to establish by an objective examination. That Deuteronomy conflicts with Numbers is obvious, and it is also obvious that the priests who edited the material recognized this fact as well, as is shown by the clumsy attempt at harmonization (see the previous section on historical contradictions in the story of Balaam. The fact that Numbers is obviously not an historical account, but rather a book of political polemics, probably targeted at the monarchy of David does not automatically make the positive account of Moab in Deuteronomy historical by default, or establish that Moses wrote Deuteronomy and that Moses did not write Numbers. There are many indications that the actual authors who wrote the books of the Bible are unknown. Note that in the following passage Moses is not only spoken of in the second person, but also in the past tense .

"So Moses the servant of YAHWEH died there in the land of Moab, according to the word of YAHWEH, and (God) buried him in the valley in the land of Moab opposite Bethpeor; but no man knows the place of his burial to this day ." (Deuteronomy Chapter 34 verse 5)

      Variant traditions and competing political polemics indicate a number of different authors were at work in various places and times. There are many passages that indicate the existence of authors other than Moses. In the opening of Deuteronomy we find the following line.

"Beyond the Jordan, in the land of Moab, Moses undertook to explain this law." (Dueteronomy Chapter 1 verse 5)

      Moses died without ever being allowed to cross the Jordan, and the writer, who as the statement implies, is on ‘the other side of the Jordan' looking back. Similarly the writer surfaces repeatedly in the manuscript to insert commentary which clearly indicates a later date of composition. There are phrases such as

"the Canaanite was then in the land." (Genesis Chapter 7 verse 6)

"...and the Canaanite and the Perizzites dwelled then in the land." (Genesis Chapter 3 verse 17)

"And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Sichem,...and the Canaanite was then in the land." (Genesis Chapter 12 verse 6)

      This excludes the time at which the author wrote. ‘The Canaanite was in the land' until well after the time that Moses is said to have died, and this excludes Moses as the author. The theme of the book of Joshua is 'expulsion of the Canaanites,' and this took place after the death of Moses, or, if we follow the alternative account in Judges, the Israelites 'dwelt among the Canaanites' even long after the death of Joshua. This excludes the time of Moses in either case. We also repeatedly find the phrase ‘as it is to this day' demonstrating a later date of composition.

"For only Og the king of Bashan was left as the sole survivor of the Rephaim; his bedstead of iron was nine cubits was its length, and four cubits its breadth. It can still be seen in the Ammonite town of Rabbah." (Deuteronomy Chapter 3 verse 11)

"All Bashan used to be called Rephaim. Jair son of Manasseh captured all the region of Argob as far as the Geshurite border. There are still tent villages there bearing his name." (Deuteronomy Chapter 3 verse 13)

     The reference to Manasseh is a reference to the conquest of the land as described in various ways in Joshua and Judges. Moses did not live to enter the land and these events took place after his death. The author is also writing about events in the past, for Manasseh is said to have captured these places at some time in the past, and now 'in the present time' there are 'still towns bearing his name.' The wording indicates that a considerable amount of time had passed, for it would not be remarkable or worth mentioning that 'towns still bear his name to this very day,' if the events described were not already part of distant history. Similarly the 'giant bed' could still be seen, another fact worth noting if one wishes to 'prove' that some historical event took place by directing readers to the location of a religious relic. It is the fact that the event occured long ago and 'towns still bear his name' or 'you can still see his bed' that is considered remarkable and worth pointing out. We also find the phrase 'as it is to this day,' indicating a later date of composition than that of the time at which the events described were purported to have taken place.

"To drive out nations from before you greater and mightier than you, to bring you in, to give you their land for an inheritance, as it is this day." (Deuteronomy Chapter 4 verse 38)

     Moses is referred to in the past tense and is also deceased at the time of certain writings.

"And this is the blessing, wherewith Moses the man of God blessed the children of Israel before his death." (Deuteronomy Chapter 33 verse 1)

"And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses, whom YAHWEH knew face to face." (Deuteronomy Chapter 34 verse 10)

"The man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt." (Exodus Chapter 11 verse 3)

"And if you have erred, and not observed all these commandments, which YAHWEH had spoken unto Moses, Even all that YAHWEH had commanded you by the hand of Moses, from the day that YAHWEH commanded Moses." (Numbers Chapter 15 verse 22)

"And YAHWEH said to Moses..." (Numbers Chapter 1 verse 1, Numbers Chapter 2 verse 1, Numbers Chapter 5 verse 1, etc., Leviticus Chapter 25 verse 1, etc.)

"...as YAHWEH commanded Moses." (Exodus 39:57, 40:19, 40:27, 40:32, Leviticus 7:37, 26:46, 27:34 etc.)

     In the following passage the author is writing after the time that Israel had conquered the land, long after the time of Moses.

"The Horims also dwelt in Seir beforetime; but the children of Esau succeeded them, when they had destroyed them from before them, and dwelt in their stead; As Israel did unto the land of his possession, which YAHWEH gave unto them" (Deuteronomy Chapter 2 verse 12)

"And these are the kings that reigned in the land of Edom, before there reigned any king over the children of Israel." (Genesis Chapter 36 verse 31)

"The sceptre shall not depart from Judah nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come." (Genesis Chapter 49 verse 10)

      Both of these passages indicate a time of composition no earlier than the time of the first kings of Israel (Saul and David). The first lists the Kings of Edom who reigned 'before there were any kings in Israel', which implies that at the time of the composition there were kings in Israel, and the second assumes that Judah had 'the sceptre' (referring to a time no earlier than that of King David). Note that the following passage refers back to the time when the Israelites were 'in the wilderness' suggesting that the author was writing at a time when they no longer were there (and this could not have been Moses, who was not allowed to leave the wilderness with the people).

"And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the Sabbath day." (Numbers Chapter 15 verse 32)

      It is then stated that no one knew what to do with the man who had gathered sticks on the Sabbath. Now, if we follow the traditions in Exodus, while Moses was on the mountain, and long before the Israelites went wandering through the wilderness, God had given Moses laws explaining exactly what to do in such a situation.

"Whosoever does any work in the Sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death." (Exodus Chapter 31 verse 15)

     According to Exodus, the matter had been settled on Mount Sinai, and according to Numbers 'no one knew what to do,' and Moses had to go and find out. Therefore it is obvious that Moses could not have been the author of the Numbers account. The alternative tradition of the Sabbath law in the book of Numbers continues:

"Those who found him gathering wood brought him to Moses and Aaron and to all the congregation; and they put him in custody because it had not been declared what should be done to him. Then YAHWEH said to Moses, "The man shall surely be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp." So all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him to death with stones, just as YAHWEH had commanded Moses." (Numbers Chapter 15, verse 33)

      There are also numerous passages that indicate knowledge of the existence of the temple. These are particularly numerous in Deuteronomy, where one of the main themes is centralization of worship, a concept that was unknown and not practiced in earlier manuscripts, where sacrifices and offerings were made in diverse places, and the practice presented no problem. Other examples include:

"The first of the firstfruits of thy land thou shalt bring into the house of YAHWEH thy God." (Exodus Chapter 23 verse 19)

      No 'house' or temple, existed until after the time of King Solomon.

"I have not dwelt in any house since the time that I brought up the children of Israel out of Egypt, even to this day, but have walked in a tent and in a tabernacle." (2 Samuel Chapter 7 verse 6)


The Campaign to Impeach George W. Bush
Click here for more information



MORE PAGES LIKE THIS ONE: DID MOSES WRITE THE BIBLE?

Conflicting accounts of the Exodus

Historical contradictions in the story of Balaam

The two Abrahams

Where were the religious shrines located?

The promiscuous editing of Genesis - the story of Judah

Variant traditions

The two versions of the flood story

Bizarre inconsistencies in the story of the tower of Babel

Jacob and the multiple traditions of Bethel

Conflicting Genealogies

The resurrection of the giants

The two stories of creation

Back to the future. Passages Moses could not have written.


RELATED ESSAYS

The story of the Golden calf, and the two versions of the story of the Ten Commandments

Contradictions on the inerrancy of the Bible in the Gospel of Matthew

Factions in the Levitical Priesthood

The radical prophets and the early church rejected Moses as the author of the Torah

The late dating of the composition of the Torah. When were the Torah laws composed?

Two separate traditions

For summary of what I believe and why I believe it, visit my Site Summary page...


PREVIOUS PAGE       INDEX... (text)       HOME       TORAH INDEX ...(text)       NEXT PAGE       EMAIL





A Unified Field Theory

failed_gravity_theory.gif - 10361 Bytes



The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file ->
unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.







Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs



A couple of years ago my bedroom was invaded by bedbugs. There were two variant genetic lines. One type of bedbug was an enlongated, thin, tubular insect, and the second genetic line was a flat, perfectly circular insect. The result of the cross breeding of these two genetically distinct variants was the production of a bedbug with charcteristics of both, an enlongated, flat bedbug with a central bulge (such that the shape of the bedbug was somewhere between 'long' and 'circular'). The long skinny bedbugs were such strange and unfamiliar looking insects that at first I did not recognize them as being bedbugs, and considered them to be a seperate species of insect. However, as the photographs of bedbugs above indicate, enlongated and skinny bedbugs are not uncommon, and the photographs also show the variants that are produced by genetic combinations that result in an insect somewhere in between 'circular' and 'enlongated'.

Therefore it is my hypothesis that evolution occurs by means of the transfer of dominate genes, with the production of such dominant genes being the product of 'biological algorithms', a genetic software program that brings physical characteristics into harmony with behavior, such that when behavior changes, and a conflict then exists, this acts as a trigger and causes the release of dominant genes. The result is rapid evolution of species. The bedbug is a relatively new insect, not the product of millions of years of evolution but rather an insect that is evolving in real time. The newly emerging dominant form of the insect is the flat, round ciruclar insect, well adapted to living in human bedrooms (it is flat, rather than tubular, thus allowing it to hide in the smallest cracks, living a stealthy lifestyle, and it is round, which gives the insect a maximum storage capacity such that it must endanger itself only a few times a month by emerging to feed.

Other examples of rapid evolution include the development of long legs in an invasive species of toad in Australia. As the toads move into the mountainous regions of Australia, and their behvaior changes, making them 'climbing toads', over the course of just a couple of decades the toads in the highlands have grown long legs specially adapted to climbing. It is worth noting here that the toads are poisonous, and are a successful invasive species because they have no natural predators in Australia, and so it would not be the case that the toads with long legs were 'the fittest survivors', because all the toads are survivors, and therefore predation does not explain the rapid emergence and spread of such well adapted, long legged toads. Once again we see evidence for the existence of biological algorithms and the rapid spread of dominant genes through a population, which once introduced proceed to overwhelm the older genes which are being replaced (making toad long legged and a bed bug round and flat).


A Theological Experiment

My interest in pursuing the Unified Field Theory is spurred on by my need to discover the theoretical explanation of a new form of propulsion (as explained on this page: Why the Unified Field Theory?). The experiment involving the bedbugs came out of nowhere.

I also believe that it is possible to justify theological propositions using experimental methods. If a thing is an objective truth then it can be verified and proven true by means of experimentation. Such a theological proposition is of more value than a ‘divine revelation’, since such revelations depend upon nothing more than establishing authority figures which requires the creation of artificial hierarchies, for the only reason why I might be encouraged to believe an authority figure who orders me to believe unsubstantiated opinions is if I could somehow be convinced that this authority possessed a mind that was somehow superior to mine, and thus was fit to express opinions as though opinions were unquestionable facts and thus worthy of being elevated to the status of absolute dogma.

There is a self evident human inequality which is visibly apparent. Some people are ‘beautiful’ and thus are the true elite on this planet, and some people are not. It is this sexual inequality and the degeneration that follows upon beauty that is the true driving force behind all the evil that happens on earth. The need for ruthless oppression and the pursuit of wealth and the consequent creation of suffering and poverty which must follow upon this practice is for the purpose of creating an artificial alpha elite.

The true elites are the young and the beautiful. The artificial elite are the rich and the wealthy. The elite aging rich artificial alpha male has no good looks, for he is physically degenerate, but he will be found escorting beauty because he has a beautiful wallet. If he loses his wallet he will be found at home with all the other unattractive aged beta males sitting in a rocking chair watching reruns of Bonanza. No money, no sex. It is for this reason that the alpha males are found to be so ruthless and so violent in pursuit of their goal. The alpha male has fallen. The beta male has arisen and now the whole planet is full of ruinous destruction for it.

We see in religion a confused and contradictory reaction to this reality. On the one hand religion preaches a sexless heaven where castration and the clitorectomy create ‘pure spirits’. Muslims throw women under sacks. On the other hand religion supports hierarchy and is the prop of the elite alpha male. It is for this reason that religion is incoherent when it comes to speaking about sex.

Now we see this same principle at work in all of nature. Guppies dance and show off their colorful tails and the guppy who dances with the most colorful tail is the sexually successful guppy. Therefore it is the doctrine of the ruthless oppressor which teaches that the solution to human sexual violence is to be found in castration and the creation of pure ghosts. This would be equivalent to damning an aardvark for having the ‘sinful aardvark nature’ or prosecuting an anteater for the high crime of ‘ant genocide’.

Therefore it was my theological hypothesis that the correct solution to this problem is to give every guppy a beautiful colorful tail. I compare this solution to the classic religious solution which is to cut off every tail since having a tail is ‘sinful’. If having a tail is sinful then God must be sinful for no human being has any choice in deciding whether or not they would be born with a colorful tail, or whether they would not.

When I was young I was a beautiful guppy with a lovely tail. So everyone seemed to think. I am older now. My nose became very badly sunburned and destroyed. It seemed good to me to test my hypothesis by using these ‘biological algorithms’ to correct this problem. I healed half my nose as you can see by the line separating the still very dark patch on the side in the photograph below.





I documented my experiment on these pages. one two t hree four fi ve six


I have confirmed to my own satisfaction that my theological proposition is correct and that religious dogma is erroneous, being based as it was upon nothing more than ‘divine revelation’ which is just a form of opinionated speculation. For the time being I am not continuing this experiment, for I must wait until the weather on this planet improves, and the dark clouds of ruthless oppression break letting a little sun shine come through so that I can show the world the truth about God, by showing people how God goes about giving an old guppy back his beautiful colorful tail.


Until then I will have to sit on the sidelines, while all my scientific breakthroughs are deliberately ignored, while I wonder to myself what ever in the world could be wrong with the human race, because what this all will prove at the end of it all is that there definitely was something wrong with the people on this planet.