The Second American Revolution : National Council of Churches

The National Council of Churches is an outfit overrun with Liberals, which would then explain why that place is so incredibly corrupt and never does a damn thing right.

The National Council of Churches has just celebrated a small increase in the minimum wage.

The National Council of Churches is applauding some Rosa Parks voting rights act, at the same time that States all over the nation are taking draconian steps to disenfranchise the poor and the oppressed. The timing could not be more perfect.

The National Council of Churches is applauding Congress, their own words, for some damn thing or another. Does it really matter. Keep in mind that what we have here is government system overrun with unpunished International War Criminals who are cooking up a poisoned souffle called Nazism for the American people, hoping to get down in time before the economy finishes going down the shitter, so ruthless oppressors can ride out the economic collapse while their asses land on the soft pillowy cushion of Hitlerism, which means they won't lose the ranch and won't lose a dime. This would be something to applaud.

Now Jesus said that any tree that was not planted by God must be uprooted and yanked out by the roots. And if there has ever been an outfit that needed to be yanked out of the ground and then left with its roots exposed to the sun to parch and dry and die out, it would be that hive of liberals sitting on top of that National Council of Churches where they have parked their asses in the hopes that maybe by pretending to care they might be able to prevent any leftists from taking over.

A liberal is someone who sees a hamster trapped in a cage, forced to spin a wheel for a ruthless weirdo, and who then starts looking for ways to make sure that the hamster doesn't escape.

As the history of revolution proves, the people are the real giants in the land, while some small parasitic cabal of ruthless oppressors is the real hamster in the land, as you can see from time to time when their is a revolution and that revolting hamster gets stomped to a bloody pulp under the boots of that giant.

Liberalism is an ideology designed to make a giant think that it is a hamster and convince that newly created hamster that some real hamster is the actual real giant in the land.

A confused giant accepts a slight increase in the minimum wage from some hamster, only because the giant's head was addled by some liberals like those in the NCC who do not want that giant to wake up and suddenly realize it is a giant, and who therefore step in as compassionate social activists who are fighting some supposed giant hamster in a courageous battle to get some giant a small increase in the minimum wage. This never worked before but now suddenly it is starting to work so that the NCC now has some ‘victories' to celebrate, because suddenly some frightened hamster has decided that maybe giving the giant a few more cents might not be a bad idea right about now. This can then be paraded as some bullshit victory by the liberals in the NCC in the hopes that perhaps some how that idiotic strategy might suffice to keep the bullshit of liberalism alive thus ensuring that the giant does not realize that it is a giant, which would then of course be a revolution, for revolutions always happen when a giant stomps an aristocratic hamster. Since liberals like the NCC leadership support hamsters and are genuine enemies of the people they are always found on the side of the counter revolution.

A liberal is someone who sees a hamster stuck in a cage forced to spin a wheel for some prick, and then tosses a few extra food pellets to the trapped hamster in the hopes that the hamster will not get pissed off enough to have a revolution.

When a liberal sees a leftist talking to the giant, the liberal automatically sets to work on that liberal bullshit of trying to convince the giant that it is a hamster, and the liberal can prove this by heroically battling for a food pellet from a real hamster, and when the scared hamster, that doesn't want to get stomped by the giant, starts handing over food pellets, the liberal hopes that the soap opera might be enough to confuse the giant and cause the giant to believe that it is the hamster and that it just received a food pellet donation from a giant. This attempt to disorient a giant is the entire strategy of the liberal, (there really isn't much more to liberalism than that - it is a simple strategy of disorientation). You see a liberal just does not want to see a hamster getting stomped by a pissed off giant.

A liberal attempts to play the role of a giant line backer who nails a leftist with the ball, by pretending to be a social activist, and proving this by bringing food pellets doled out by some scared hamster to some pissed off giant, while of course, this being liberalism, the liberal will attempt to do the role reversal and pretend that hamsters get food pellets from giants at the same time. This is the entire strategy of a liberal pretending to be a social activist. They think they are line backers nailing a leftist with a ball, or at least they hope to be line backers and they hope to nail a leftist. Actually, they are liberals and they are not even in the game, but they continue to nurse their aspirations to someday become a linebacker.

We are supposed to admire liberals as advocates for ‘social justice' because of those food pellets they seek to deliver. Liberals had real bad luck getting food pellets just up until this month, when now that a leftist has created a scared hamster, suddenly liberals are finding it a lot easier to get food pellets. That is the strange relationship that exists between leftists and liberals. Liberals are always shit out of luck until a leftist comes along.

A liberal is someone who sees a hamster stuck in a cage and forced to spin a wheel for some arrogant ruthless prick, and then tosses in a food pellet in the hopes that the hamster won't get to pissed off about that raw deal and then finally decide to do something about it.

That trapped hamsters might break out of their cages is like some kind of horrible nightmare to a liberal for some queer reason. It is also the nightmare of the tiny aristocracy who keep hamsters in cages, and so we can see that liberals and aristocrats have an interest in common, and so they conspire together against trapped hamsters.

When the times are revolutionary, there is always the smell of skunk in the air.

When the times are revolutionary, there are always liberals everywhere. Even if liberalism was as dead as a doornail for two decades, suddenly there appears the lucky liberal, with a food pellet.

Even though the Nazis run the government, you will find liberals encouraging people to turn to the government, and perhaps vote for some Hindenburg puked out by that Nazi system. The reason for this is that both Nazis and Liberals are concerned with the project of keeping hamsters in cages spinning wheels, and since they are both oppressors of hamsters, they have much in common, and what differences do exist between a liberal and a Nazi are only tactical in nature.

When a wheel spinning hamster gets pissed off, a liberal will attempt to pacify the hamster. If this does not work the liberal will stand aside while a Nazi attempts to terrorize a hamster.

The reason why there was no real opposition capable of stopping Hitler in Germany was because the supposed opposition was actually just a bunch of liberals, and since that wasn't really an opposition, but just a tactical quarrel about how best to trap hamsters, in the end there was no opposition, and the hamsters wound up getting the shit beat out of them by Hitler.

There is no opposition to the rising tide of Nazism because all the opposition has been sucked into the swirling toilet bowl of liberalism, where it can be safely flushed down the toilet like a turd.

You often hear people complaining about the American people, and why even though the country is going to hell in a hand basket, they never seem to do anything about it. What is wrong with the American people, you so often hear. The problem with the American people is that the system they live under is so despotic, run as it is by despotic little Napoleans like that capitalist, that the American people only know about liberals but they know nothing about leftists, since liberals area allowed but leftists are banned. For this reason the American people ‘do nothing' because they are led around and disoriented and confused by liberals.

The American people would do something about their shitty country if only they knew that they could. It is the task of the liberal to make damn sure that they don't find out that they could if only they knew they could.

If destruction is coming, the liberal will make damn sure that it does come, so that the giant will not stomp the hamster into a pile of bloody pulp and put a stop to it.

To stop destruction it turns out that the answer to that problem is to stomp a hamster into a bloody pulp. The reason for this is that the hamster is the ruling class hamster and therefore must take complete responsibility for how things turn out. This is especially true when that ruling class hamster is some Napoleonic Caesar like that capitalist ruling class, and since they are autocrats, therefore since their word is law, they take all the responsibility since it turns out that no autocrat ever wanted to share rulership and so therefore there is no logical reason why they should get away with trying to share blame.

A hamster goes by the name ‘the ruling class' and when you have a ruling class that means that you have someone to blame and then someone to stomp when disaster arrives (its called a revolution). The task of the liberal is once again to introduce mass confusion, by making it seem like you can run the show and then if its a bad show that doesn't mean that the curtain should come down.

A liberal is someone who will sell tickets to a play no matter how bad the actors are and how badly written is the script.

A liberal is someone who first introduces mass confusion and then uses mass confusion to convince the people that everything is their fault and not the fault of the ruling class, because heavy on the head of the king lies the crown, because, you see, the King has the heavy burden of dealing with that unruly mob of massly confused people. Once a leftist unconfuses their heads, and does away with the liberal so it won't happen again, the King will be relieved of the burden of the unruly confused mob and instead find himself dealing with the burden of unruly mob with 20/20 vision, which is going to be a problem. This would explain why liberals are always found blowing smoke into everyone's eyes. You see, the crown really wasn't that heavy, and the liberal wants to make damn sure that it doesn't get heavy..

When there is full employment you have a ruling class begging for workers rather than workers begging for jobs, and thus begging for a chance to be a hamster spinning one of those wheels for some greedy domineering prick. Whoever is the boss is the one with money, and so for this reason the ruling class makes damn sure the unemployment rate doesn't drop, which then creates a make work project for liberals who can then continue on trying to confuse everyone into believing that a hamster aristocracy is a giant while at the same time pretending to be for ‘social justice' by handing out band aids, in the hopes that somehow that might derail a leftist agenda.

Even when you kick some liberal real hard in the balls so they feel it, for some bizarre reason they just keep right on being liberals, in fact they try even harder to be a liberal, which is idiotic when a determined leftist is around, because it accomplishes nothing, and only gets a liberal kicked in the balls one more time, only this time even harder than before.

Listen to that uproar, that uproar in the temple.

When a leftist tells the truth, a liberal is washed up, which then explains why you can have liberals, because they are oppressors, but you cannot have leftists.

A ruthless oppressor is just some brain dead vegetable, and they go off to their ruinous destruction time and time again. When an oppressor is also ‘the ruling hamster class' that means that they drag humanity down to ruinous destruction again and again, while some priest blames the people for being sinful pigs, which is similar to what a liberal does, but in a slightly different way.

A liberal introduces a false contradiction into the mind of the giant, by convincing the giant that the giant is a hamster who is facing down a giant aristocracy. This mass confusion then leads to all sorts of addle conduct among the population, which the priest also encourages using the doctrine of original sin, which then sets people one against the other, blaming each other for not getting more done to save a bad situation, either because they original pigs or they just don't give a damn. Whenever you hear someone saying ‘the American people don't give a damn' this is someone whose head has been addled by a liberal so that they believe that a hamster is brontosaurus. Actually the American people believe that a hamster is a brontosaurus. It is not that they don't care, but that they cannot think of any way to fight such a huge brontosaurus, convinced as they are that they are hamsters, and thus they spend a lot of time thinking up stupid strategies as to how some hamster like themselves can fight a brontosaurus, when actually it is the other way around. This confused mental state is the gift of some enslaving liberal, who just does not want to see an aristocratic hamster stopped to a bloody pulp under the huge hoof of a big brontosaurus.

After the leftist has spoken, the liberal should have enough brains to shut up. But then I suppose it is true what they say, ‘hope springs eternal.'

A Unified Field Theory

The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.

Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs