May 20th, 2006 : A Message for the Pope

Last night I was instructed by the one I call my ‘Guardian Angel' to give the following message to the Pope : "Speak clearly and do not attempt to obscure what you really mean to say."

A few comments

As of last week I decided that I was through with prophecy, unless I received specific instructions to deliver a message, and so from this time forth that is all I will do. If I receive instructions to deliver a message, I will do so, but otherwise I will say nothing. Last night I received such an instruction and so I deliver the message. Apparently my Guardian Angel feels that you are sending ‘coded' messages and that it would be more sensible if you were to be blunt, and just come right out with it and say exactly whatever it is that you want to say.

I believe that one such obscure and coded message could have been your recent sermon on Peter. According to what you said, Peter was expecting the Jewish Warrior Messiah, but that was not the plan at the time, and so he was told, ‘Get thee behind me Satan.' You then made one blunt statement that was not coded, words to the effect that ‘you might want to reform Christianity, but it is the Lord who knows best.'

Now I will attempt to interpret what you meant to say. You feel that the prophecy of the wrath of YAHWEH is similar to Peter expecting the Jewish Messiah King, and so therefore you say to me, ‘Get thee behind me Satan.' I would assume that you feel that what is desirable is something ‘spiritual' like perhaps going to church, which does not need to be reformed, because it is the ‘spiritual' enterprise that ‘the Lord wants and he knows best.' Am I correct in this interpretation of what you really meant to say? I will assume that I am and give you an appropriate response.

Let me begin by reminding you of the story of what happened to me at Banff National Park when I was fifteen. This was the description of an ‘objective reality.' What I mean is that I was telling you the truth, and that I was describing something that really does exist. This was the one whom I refer to as my ‘Guardian Angel', and as I mentioned this was followed by a wave of sightings of these luminous craft over my hometown of Melville, Saskatchewan, in the months that followed. There were many witnesses. The story made the National News. Scientists felt compelled to respond. It was a weather balloon. It was eruptions of natural gas. The point to be made here is that it was real. It was the description of an objective reality.

This brings me to my first point, which is that I do not work alone. I do not ‘express my opinion.' If it was ‘my own opinion' that ‘the wrath of YAHWEH was coming' then I would not deliver such a message, since I concerned with doing this job properly, and that means consulting my Guardian Angel in order to confirm the message. So then, if you critique my message, what you are actually doing is criticizing the message from heaven, you might say, since my message is not ‘my message'. I am not interested in preaching ‘my message'. I have a job to do and it is important to me that I do the job correctly. That means not relying on myself. I wish to be accurate, and I do not wish to promote ‘my personal theology'.

Now I find religious people extremely difficult to talk to when it comes to certain subjects, since they are faithless and unbelieving, and therefore they have ears, but they do not hear. They have eyes, but they cannot see. Even if they see much, they do not comprehend. As I have insisted in the past, this peculiar behavior is the product of long exile away from the living heavens. To such religious people, the heavens are actually a dead lifeless place, full of the blackness of space that stretches off into empty, lifeless eternity. This is not true, but they believe it to be true, and the reason why they believe such a thing is because they are in exile and a great barrier of separation exists between them and the abundant life that actually exists in heaven. It is interesting to note that heaven obeys the ban. These people are in exile, and all the life in heaven obeys the ban, and abandons them to lonely exile.

I have come to the conclusion that there are two types of atheists in existence in the world today. There is the religious atheist, who claims to believe in God, but does not believe. You can tell that religious people do not believe, for if you do believe, as I do, and thus speak as I do, they regard you as a being an untreated psychiatric patient. You see, we all know that God does nothing, and therefore anyone who would be so out of touch with reality as everyone has come to know it on this planet must therefore be mentally unbalanced.

The second type of atheist is the professing atheist, who after looking upon the state of the world has drawn the conclusion that it is only reasonable to conclude that there is no God. This conclusion is then confirmed when an atheist listens to religious people, and makes note of the fact that religious people seem to be congenital liars, who never tell the truth, and instead are delusional. The professing atheist then understands that religious people sink into delusional thinking because they are unable to deal with the reality of their situation, and prefer a fantasy.

This analysis of the psychology of religion is correct. An honest religious person would not be delusional, and would then be found struggling with difficult questions. I have heard some religious people ask questions such as the following : ‘We have heard legendary stories from the past which describe the powerful deeds of God. Why then is it that our God does nothing today, and why is it that our God has done nothing at all for thousands of years?'

This is honest talk, and it can be contrasted with the desperate delusional speech of dishonest religion. Truly the many marvelous deeds of God are actually quite paltry. (Dave quit drinking. John and Sue now have a happy marriage. Joan's rebellious son, Al, found the Lord and gave up partying and running with the gang.) Yes, the power of God is all around us, they insist, working to clean up family life our in suburbia, which seems to be about the only thing God does (worry about the family and its values).

Meanwhile tens of thousands of little kids and infants suffer hunger pangs and die of malnourishment every day. The world is full of oppression. Over the last few decades of ‘neo- liberal globalization' the slums have swollen to the point where they now warehouse humanity in the billions, and where the struggle to survive has been compared to the daily fight for life in a concentration camp. While the poor were pushed out of jobs to increase ‘productivity' and profits (what was called the ‘painful restructuring' of the third world to ‘attract the international investor') the richest of the rich doubled their wealth. So much money was once again sucked out of the ‘third world', and even the ‘second world' that the world suffered repeated economic catastrophes (the Asian collapse, the fall of Argentina into a depression, the collapse of the so called ‘emerging markets' bubble).

All this oppression and all this suffering and hunger and the criminal neglect of governments (who service the rich and crush the poor) has not evoked any response from any God. Neither did it evoke much of a response from religion. Rather we are told that God is busy in suburbia, helping Alice and Tim avoid the horrible sin of divorce, and straightening out teenage Tommy, getting him off booze and pot, and giving little Sarah the grace to take a vow of ‘chastity'. Such are the deeds of God. God, we are told, is now in the business of ‘changing lives', which is good, for if not for that God would have no business at all, and would be seen to be doing nothing at all. God is spiritual, we are told, which is another way of saying that God doesn't do anything at all. The same people who carry on about the ‘spiritual God' who ‘changes lives' are also the very people who regard any talk of the mighty deeds of God to be the ravings of a lunatic. They know better than that. They are well trained religious atheists, and they have never seen God do a thing, nor do they expect to see God do a thing. That is why they are now ‘spiritual'

Therefore, based upon what I can see, on this planet the people are either ‘spiritual atheists' (in which case they are religious) or they are professing atheists, the difference being that a professing atheist just tells the truth (God does nothing) and a spiritual religious atheists attempts to make some big deal out of the fact that God is changing lives, having straightened out an alcoholic using ‘supernatural powers'.

In your Sermon you made an analogy to Peter. Now allow me to use an analogy. I will refer to the Holy of Holies. When people dwell in exile, their is a veil covering the Holy of Holies. Now last week, when I wrote up the prophecy concerning the Wrath of YAHWEH, I felt discontented. I was concerned that something was missing. Something more needed to be said. I told myself, ‘if something more needs to be said, it will be made clear to me.' I was correct. The veil parted and I was taken into the Holy of Holies, only for a minute of two, but as it turned out that was more than sufficient to clear my mind.

What actually happened is that YAHWEH, in person, and not my Guardian Angel showed up, and YAHWEH instructed me to deliver a message to Israel. The message was ‘Your idol is malignant.' Now who is like YAHWEH? To what can YAHWEH be compared. There is no one like YAHWEH, nor can YAHWEH be compared to anyone. Words fail me. You people will have to discover what I mean for yourselves when the time comes. What lies behind the veil, and what would one find if one entered into the Holy of Holies today. Such mounting fury is truly an awe inspiring thing to experience. Who is like YAHWEH?

What can I possibly say to you people. How little you really know. How little you believe. I could tell you that there is a veil over the Holy of Holies. Then, you, being religious, could quarrel with me concerning doctrine, for was it not written that the veil was torn in the Holy of Holies. Now it is also true that YAHWEH is an objective reality as well. And there is a growing fire burning behind the veil in the Holy of Holies. The fact that you contradict me is evidence that a veil is covering the Holy of Holies, because you do not see the fire. The fact that some people deliver ‘a word of knowledge from YAHWEH', but it is a word with no knowledge, is proof positive that a veil is now covering the Holy of Holies. What good does it do to quote verses or bring up doctrine when this practice only contradicts the objective reality? Objective reality can be know through experience and observation. What is accomplished to deny reality by means of employing the device of doctrine? Objective reality supersedes doctrine and supersedes book quotes. One could argue that if the veil was ripped away, someone must have put up a set of blinds, because the fact of the matter is that a veil is now covering the Holy of Holies. This will become abundantly clear when the veil is removed and people discover what was really behind the veil and was dwelling in the Holy of Holies.

Now perhaps I can reason with you to make the point clear. There are two possibilities. There is a God. There is no God.

Now let us consider the very popular loving gentle lovable god, which you find in so many churches, and who is like a kindly old grandpa bouncing his little grandchild on his knee. This ever so loving and kindly god is quite popular in many churches today. Now if such a god was God then one must wonder why all this little babies are seriously hungry every day, and why all the ruthless do wickedly and destroy everyday. It turns out that, as in churches, so also do the professing atheists of the world believe in the concept of the kindly grandpa god, which is why they are atheists, because, you see, a person would have to be delusional to believe in a god like that one in a world like this one. I have heard atheists explain their reason something as follows : God should be a loving grandpa god, and yet it seems, from looking at the world, that any god that exists here must be a ruthless prick, and since no god can be a ruthless prick, therefore there is no god.' The kindly grandpa god is also the cause of the phenomena of religious atheism which is so wide spread in the world today, for, you see, even religious people have a hard time believing in that one, which makes one wonder why they bother trying.

So therefore I suggest to you that the vapid picture of the loving grandpa god, so cherished by religion, is irrational. However it does not then follow that there is no God, but rather, if there is a God then it must be true that YAHWEH is God. If YAHWEH is God then it must be true that there is, as I have been testifying, a bonfire burning in the Holy of Holies, behind the veil.

Now to really understand why it would be the case that YAHWEH is God, one must understand religious people, which isn't easy. Let us say that one cannot understand religious people (I have a hard time with it myself) but even if one cannot understand religious people, at the very least one can observe what religious people are like, and then perhaps be puzzled. It is enough to observe religious people, even if they are difficult to understand. This process of observation is required if we are to understand why it would be the case that YAHWEH is God, and for this reason Christian apologetics can never refute an atheist, for you see Christians would have to be honest in order to explain why it is that YAHWEH is God, and they are not honest, and therefore their polemics leave something to be desired.

I, however, am an objective observer, and as much as religious people might hate my sermonizing on the subject, it is my task to explain to the world why it is that YAHWEH is God and therefore, in order to glorify and justify the righteousness of YAHWEH, I must dishonor religion. For you see, it is only when religion is thoroughly dishonored and completely discredited that suddenly it all makes sense, and people will understand that, yes, there is a God, and that God is YAHWEH which will then help them understand all those ‘divine mysteries' of life that are giving them all so much trouble.

Now disobedience is the same as idolatry. It is important for people to understand just how disobedient religion is, for then they will understand that people on this planet are actually worshiping a block of wood. People are also very stubborn, and will not admit that they are disobedient, but rather they proclaim their righteousness, which is a problem. They also stubbornly refuse to admit that they were worshiping a block of wood. Consider Israel as just one example. If anyone cracks open a bible they can read about Israel's malignant idol, that block of wood she was worshiping, which was a god of slaughter and genocide and imperialism and mass murder and robbery. As you would know, that same malignant idol of hers is also found in the church, and has been printed up a billion times or more, translated into every language they say, so that now the whole earth has been polluted with that filthy idol.

Now if anyone can suggest someway to get Israel or the church to give up on that dirty idol, they can let me know. God knows I have tried to get rid of the thing with no luck whatsoever, which then explains that blazing fire behind the veil in the Holy of Holies. This would then explain why your God is not the kind baby bouncing grandpa god, but instead it turns out that YAHWEH is God. How long does it take to get rid of a filthy idol. Thousands of years of ruthless exile is not enough time. Still the dirty old filthy idol remains. They are a very stubborn people, and it is very hard to understand. They say, ‘why does our god do nothing for thousands of years.' The correct answer to that so called ‘divine mystery' is that your god is a block of wood, and they don't do much those wood blocks. If it falls over you will have to call a religious apologist to rush over and set the thing back on its feet. They don't do much for themselves those blocks of wood. Remarkably, you can put stubborn people into ruthless exile in a land as dark as death, with that idol as their god, and even after they have made futile prayers to that ridiculous thing for a few thousand years, with no results, at the end of it all they ar e still carrying on about how that thing used its great idol powers to get Tom to kick alcohol.

A Unified Field Theory

The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.

Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs