Background story
On April 24th, 2001, two days after Earth Day, and The Summit of the Americas, as part of the propaganda of the Summit week, NASA was scheduled to demonstrate American prowess in space, after the G8 went through some propaganda exercise of pretending to care about the Earth by scheduling a Summit of the Americas for the Earth Day weekend. Quite by accident, NASA broadcast live on International Television a luminous glowing spacecraft using the Shuttle cameras, after this craft approached the International Space Station. There was one small leak that came out of NASA regarding this space craft, as reported on the BBC site UFO Video goes to Hollywood and the quote of interest reads, ""officials at NASA are said to have asked to examine the tape, because they believe it shows the same type of craft once spotted by the space agency's own cameras during a space shuttle mission. " This would the same space craft that has been appearing in the skies over Saskatoon just about every night lately, something I thought I would mention in case someone was noticing these things, for example, the extremely brilliant object that appeared this evening and then went up into space and disappeared to a pin point. This would also be the same space craft that was involved in that unexpected protest event of mine at the Summit of the Americas, where, on Friday, April 20th, I sent out all those Press releases for what I was calling at the time my ‘Eden Wing Banner' that I was planning to unfurl at the Summit, in keeping with that tradition of unfurling banners at Summits, this one being a big banner made out of clouds over the Sahara desert, unfurled on Sunday, which was Earth Day.
Of course, I was not an idiot who expected to make such a wing out of clouds myself, and was counting on some help from those people in that space craft I am telling people about, and from time to time, when I have a good idea, they help me out, and when I have a bad idea, well then they veto that idea and I have to find a better idea instead. For that reason my plan to point a pistol at NASA and ‘hold NASA hostage' until they released that video was vetoed, and consequently I am now trying the better idea instead.
NASA
I would assume that the folks at NASA have their ‘national security papers', which are a kind of permission slip given to them by the powers that be that presume to give NASA official permission to participate in a system of evil oppression by hiding that video and keeping the truth from the public. This leads me to ask NASA the following questions. Just what were you planing to do at the end of it all? How much good is that ‘permission slip' of yours going to do you when the truth does finally come out. What will you have accomplished other than dragging yourself down into the muck? Is this how you go about ‘exploring space', NASA, by behaving like some kind of hypocrite. Explore space, but not to much. Explore space, just as long as it doesn't upset any apple carts. Explore space just as long as it does not threaten the careerism of your astronauts, for whom I am sure, going into space outweighs every other consideration on the face of the planet. Your own careers are just that important to you, is that the case NASA? Later on, when the stench is rising up off your space agency like the stink from some steaming manure pile, when the public is shocked and scandalized by your opportunistic careerism, what were you planning to do then, NASA? What will you do at the end of it all?So you can see then, NASA, that it is my intention to switch from using a pistol on you people, by scaling up to a weapon of mass destruction instead, which will do considerably more damage in the long term, thus being a much better strategy.
Scientists
We are given to believe that scientists are motivated exclusively by the desire to come up with the truth as based upon the empirical evidence. Certainly this must be as true for the scientists working over there at NASA as would be the case every where one finds a scientist hard at work on that project of theirs, revealing the truth about the universe and so on. However it would seem to be the case that from time to time, when the results of science produce a conclusion which is ideologically undesirable, suddenly the rules change, and rather than looking for the truth, or coming up with some theory based upon the evidence, scientists begin looking for ways to hide the evidence so as to avoid the truth.Which leads me to ask the scientists, just how often does this sort of thing happen in the world of science. How many other truths are there out there that being ideologically offensive, have been buried by scientists under some manure pile somewhere? Having seen this blatant display of hypocrisy the one time, I cannot help but wonder what else might be going on that we don't know about, since it is readily apparent that scientists are quite capable of being hypocrites when the sacred evidence which is supposedly the bedrock foundation of the scientific method produces results that scientists do not prefer, thus causing them to produce wrong evidence instead so as to get the results they were looking for....
Philosophers
The same could be said of philosophers, who, being quite ignorant, continue to humiliate themselves on a daily basis by spreading their own erroneous opinions around as though somehow holding to a false belief system was the way to become regarded as a wise man in this particular culture. Given how inconvenient the truth is going to be to those philosophers, and given how important careerism really is to such saintly and pure types as the truth seeking philosopher or the evidence loving scientist, I suppose while one might think that they would turn on a dime when the evidence requires that this be done, in actual practice, in order to protect their big pile of nonsensical paper work, they will in fact bury that bad evidence in some manure pile, and then go on with the task of making themselves look like complete fools, as though they thought that somehow a system of evil oppression would continue on forever, and never collapse, thus saving their careers and their reputations as well. Given how soiled they become by continuing this practice, one could then expect them to become fierce enemies of the truth, so as to maintain their book sales, as well as to keep students taking notes in classrooms this fall, while some ignorant philosopher continues to mouth off and spout discredited rubbish until finally the roof caves in on their heads and they are brought to total and utter ruin.Being philosophers, and thus a great genius of some kind, one would expect them to already know and understand these sorts of things, but apparently they do not, as is demonstrated by how they carry on, believing as they do that they will get away with it all, the system of evil oppression they are working within and so diligently support, apparently seeming invincible to them, a conclusion one can assume that they draw from the well springs of that philosophy of theirs, which is one more indication of just how wrong their nonsense really is at the end of it all...
Opinion makers and columnists
I was visiting the Znet site, and read a piece titled A Tower of Turtles. Here some author insisted that the doctrine of ‘intelligent design' was unscientific, given that such matters were outside the realm of science, which requires evidence, and while there is no evidence for ‘intelligent design' apparently there is just tons of evidence for the lack of intelligence, a conclusion I do not dispute. As for my opinion, while I usually keep my mouth shut about things I do not know anything about, so I will not express an opinion on this particular subject, while at the same time I will express my hope that in the future other people learn to keep their mouths shut as well instead of making a public display of their hypocrisy, while hoping that the system of evil oppression will prove to be so invincible that they will be able to get away with such hypocrisy forever and ever and ever.Churches
Back during the Clinton Administration, I was attempting to bring these matters to the attention of churches, and as I told them at a time, they really needed to see these things for themselves. I wound up locked up in what I called the ‘dungeon' at some mental hospital, where the most dangerous people on earth are kept locked up, since when you get slammed by a church minister this is extremely damaging, thus you wind up locked up in the hole, being to dangerous to risk having escape back out into the general population.When I was down in the hole, I was thinking about how extremely dangerous a church minister really is, and wondering why they did not take up my offer, pull up a lawn chair, and see for themselves. Looking back on it now I can understand that given how some church ministers will be very embarrassed by their own sermons, they might be crossing their fingers and hoping against hope that the system of evil oppression can maintain itself, thus not harming their careers, and leaving church ministers to seem wise, even though they are not wise at all, but actually look rather foolish when compared to someone like me. Furthermore, I will also be the complete destruction of such foolishness as that church ‘theology', which is a classic example of ‘straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel,' which means I can expect nothing but trouble from church professors and various theologians, who actually think that those church fathers wrote manuscripts worth reading, while I spent a lot of time wondering just how I could completely destroy such worthless nonsense and wipe that source of mass confusion and full scale rebellion right off the face of the earth.
I am a revolutionary, as you would know, and consequently I am never alone, unlike that lonely church, which has had religion instead of revolution, and thus spent a few thousand years alone, and probably got the idea in their heads that somehow that was normal, even though we live in a universe that throbs with life. Its called being in exile, which is the true history of the church, and the simple truth about what happened to the church, since exile is the appropriate punishment for those obnoxious forms of rebellion known as ‘religion' and ‘theology', and explains why churches have no evidence to back up their claims, thus allowing columnists or philosophers or scientists to crap all over churches at their discretion, being ignorant as they are about these matters, thus leading them to assume that a religious church should not be lonely, which must therefore be evidence of the loneliness of the church, although, truth be told, as time will fully reveal, it was only evidence for the rebellion of churches who chose all that nonsense about religion and theology since they didn't want to rock the boat by having a revolution instead.
Having said all that, I am sure that if you churches should get yourselves straightened out, you would find, as I have found, that you are not lonely anymore, and one way to find out if your house is in fact in order would be to check your loneliness quotient, and keep house cleaning until you are not lonely anymore, which would be the real evidence that you are not so offensive that you are still trapped in exile, which is a very lonely place to spend a couple of thousand years, as you churches should know from your own personal experience.
Turbulent Sahara
