A letter to 'Prophet Yahweh'

I sent you a couple of emails previously, to express my support for any efforts you might make to release video tapes of these unusual craft, while at the same time I expressed some reservations as to how you are interpreting this experience (my website is awitness.org, and I am the one who suggested that your ‘politics' were not good...as I attempted to point out, this is caused by having your own individuality and your personality subsumed by the combination of this powerful experience you have had together with uncritical reading of the Bible, with the end result of this process being a loss of your own self, as you become overrun by the ideas planted by priests in the Bible...I recognize this process, since you can consider me a peer - not a disciple of some kind, but rather a member of your peer group - and thus given some common experiences that we share, in particular what I see as some erratic behavior and even some emotionally instability which I am also familiar with in having had to deal with this myself, I felt that it was good to write to you as a peer and say a few things that were on my mind).

Now let me begin by correcting some misconceptions you have expressed in some of your past writings. First, you have stated that you, and you alone, are the only one in the world who has been assigned as a ‘prophet of YAHWEH' by means of what you call ‘miracles'. I will just point out to you that you are not unique, but that there is more going on than you know about, just as there is more going on than I know about, and you are just one part of something bigger than you are. I will direct you to my ‘prophecy' zip file once again, where you can find some more information.

http://www.awitness.org/prophecy04.zip

I will also direct you to the page from April, 2001 where I was given the privilege of making a big wing shaped like a cloud during the Summit of the Americas.

http://www.awitness.org/eden_wing/wing_pic.htmlAnd here are the ‘press releases' for that wing, which you will note were dated Friday, April 20th(the wing appeared on Sunday, April 22nd, two days later, which was Earth Day).

http://www.awitness.org/news/november_2001/eden_wing_press_release.html

That was a ‘prophecy', one of the few, since the job of a ‘prophet' isn't so much to awe people by ‘predicting the future', but rather the task is ‘political'. But I won't say much more about this, but instead I will leave you with the link to that prophecy file and the ‘political message' therein.

This was followed on Tuesday, April 24th, 2001, two days later, with an appearance, broadcast live around the world by NASA, of a luminous space craft which appeared outside the International Space Station and was caught by the cameras of the Shuttle. So it is also not true that you are the first person ever to have one of these craft appear on the media, although you might the first to ever ‘summon' such a craft. I had no idea that was going to happen, and I just happened to be one of the lucky ones who was watching the live broadcast when it happened.

There was one small leak from NASA, about five weeks later, on June 1st, 2001, when the admitted that they did have such a video. On the BBC site,UFO Video Goes to Hollywoodhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1363000/1363848.stmThe relevant quote from the article: "officials at NASA are said to have asked to examine the tape, because they believe it shows the same type of craft once spotted by the space agency's own cameras during a space shuttle mission. "

This has been followed by a coverup since that time, which is understandable when you consider the political significance of that wing shaped cloud at the Summit of the Americas (read the prophecy file). The next day, Wednesday there was a failure of the main computer, the backup and the standby, which is a failure of triple redundancy, which is supposed to be nearly impossible, which is why NASA does it that way.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1298026.stm Technicians worked through the night to restore control over the orbiting platform after losing contact with its payload computer system, a backup and a standby on Wednesday. During the computer failure, Nasa used systems on board Endeavour to communicate with the ISS. It could also have talked to the station via Russian ground controllers. The use of rotating main, backup and standby systems is designed to prevent such a communications breakdown, but, it seems, all three systems were cut off at the same time.Flight controllers will analyse its systems to try to find out what went wrong, Nasa said.

You can understand that if it is almost impossible to have a failure of a triple redundant system, it is also almost impossible for me to see that as being just coincidental with the appearance of one of these craft outside the Space Station just before that happened, and I am sure that when you add on the coincidence of that wing shaped cloud the odds of all being ‘coincidental' must be astronomically high. It was, for me, an interesting week, and one of the best weeks of my life, because there is nothing quite like being justified, especially after a person had been through all the abuse I had been through over the years and that terrible, terrible pain of carrying around a secret that no one could be told because no one could hear it even if you tried to tell them.

Even though NASA has hidden that video from the public, the episode was not a total waste. First of all, I became an ambassador of sorts, and when I speak, politicians all over the world listen. I am probably the most famous not famous person in the world. The second reason why this was done is that by hiding that video it becomes a trap and a snare, and really people get in more trouble for hiding it than was worth the trouble, and you can understand this if you think long term. As I was telling NASA, they should practice civil disobedience and release that video and tell the truth, because sooner of later the truth will come out, and then all the trouble they have been saving up for themselves will follow. There is just no stopping the truth at the end of it all.

And this is one of the reasons I am interested in your ‘career', if you want to call it that, because this could very well be one of the ways what I was expecting to happen could actually happen. I support your ‘summoning' agenda, even though I do not support your ‘teachings' and ‘prophecy' and I really wish you would stop, at least until you get over what is wrong with you.

I am not saying that to judge you, but rather what I am saying is that I have been there, done that myself, and it really upsets and disturbs me to see you doing it as well. And I am not ‘a disciple', but rather I am your ‘peer', and thus I speak to you as a peer, which is my right being a peer after all. You see, I do believe that something is going on here, and as I said, it is eerily similar to my own experience (of being erratic and emotionally unstable, which is what I see in you, as well as being a victim of violent superstition, which is also what I see in you...I am not judging you, but I am going to try to talk to you, because I am concerned about his matter.

In the past I was so disturbed for so many years that I desperately wanted to see a therapist or a psychiatrist, but those people were worthless to me, since the typical diagnosis would be ‘psychosis', which was an indication, as they said, that although what I believed what was happening to me was real, it wasn't, and I just thought it was. In frustration, I finally got angry about five years ago, and started reading about every psychiatric disturbance and personality disorder there was, in an attempt to treat myself, and after a lot of sifting and searching and studying I found the diagnosis for ‘post traumatic stress disorder', which changed my life forever. It was the beginning of healing process and getting away from that horrible ordeal of pain that I was going through before that time, because for some reason just being able to name what that was and understand it was what I required. I will remind you here that the Bible is an extremely violent book and is morally reprehensible in that regard, calling evil good and good evil, and this combined with some bad Dragon attacks was the source of my trauma. I believe that it might be the case that this also explains what is wrong with you.

As for that bit of yours about ‘Black Israelites', well let me point out to you that I am white and I also have no genuine attraction to women. This caused me a lot of torment in the past. I have come to suspect that in part this might have something to do with what is written in Ezekiel.

"I will restore the fortunes of Sodom and I shall restore yours at the same time. When you bring them comfort you will bear your shame and feel disgraced for what you have done. After your sister Sodom becomes what she was of old, then you yourself will be restored likewise. Did you not speak contemptuously of your sister Sodom in the days of your arrogant pride, before your own wickedness was exposed? Even know you are finding out what it is like to be despised by all your neighbours. Now you must bear the consequences of your lewd and abominable conduct. I shall treat you as you deserve for you have violated the terms of your covenant. You will remember your past conduct and feel ashamed and humiliated so that you will never open your mouth again. This is the Word of Yahweh God." (Ezekiel chapter 16 verse 53)

The point to be made here is that YAHWEH is always found with the weaker people and with the oppressed, and not with the powerful and neither does YAHWEH like religion, and when you consider the crimes of religion, the monstrous genocides of the Bible being one of the chief crimes of priests through the ages, you can understand why that would be the case. Now my people do not know the requirements of God. Who has known YAHWEH? Who has ever understood? These people are lost and religion is the salvation of no one, for they do not understand YAHWEH. You also subscribe to and promote that fire breathing ruthlessly cruel vision of God, and so I am telling you that you don't yet understand either. So I am going to tell you who I am, so that as you think about what this means, perhaps you might come to know YAHWEH. This is the real reason I am here, so that by the time I am through religion will be destroyed and thoroughly discredited, and even more important, through me, they might come to understand YAHWEH. There is something here that is very obvious to me, but it is difficult to communicate to other people due to the crushing power of human superstition.

I wrote you a few brief emails. Since that time I have been thinking again and again about this matter, and it has occurred to me that there is still one job left undone - referring here to the writing I have been doing lately and posting on line - and this also happens to be something that I feel I should discuss with you and bring to your attention. There are some similarities and some differences between the two of us. For example, you speak of ‘summoning' and I can understand the powerful emotional need that you would feel to do this, because I have that same burning desire to see some progress made on this issue. Given how little control an individual actually has in these matters, I would suggest that you spare yourself some humiliation by no longer telling people that you somehow have control of the situation or can ‘summon on command', because as those humiliating failures demonstrate so well, you are actually the recipient of grace, and you are not in control. If you just level with people and tell them something like this, the sporadic nature of this phenomenon can become easier to bear, and you won't have to start making those excuses, which will then be leapt upon by those who seem to make a career out of attacking you to call into question your legitimacy.

Here they find an open door because your professed abilities do not match the facts, and thus this indicates that your theology is in error and needs to be corrected on this point. I believe that it is probably true that after years of putting up with criticism from people who are clearly wrong, and do not know anything about those things about which they are so critical, and after putting up with attacks, it is probably the case that now you have become stubborn and unable to admit to a mistake, this type of behavior being something I am also familiar with, and it just leads to emotional turmoil and confusion as reality collides with your theology and your expectations.

Furthermore, you will then also undermine your own cause, because even if it is true that you have tapes and experiences, nevertheless what you are saying is not correct, and for this reason it does not sound right to those who hear you, which causes them to dismiss you, which then leads you to adopt the same defiant and even aggressive posture, which then leads to a vicious circle.

Now some opponents will be opponents even if your ideas were more realistic but there are some people who might be more willing to listen if they are actually hearing something reasonable. As for those who are attacking your theological positions, I have noticed a great deal of hypocrisy on display on the part of Christians, who will condemn you for ‘racism' and for your current racist position on ‘mixed marriages', calling these horrible, and even an abomination, while at the same time they are ready to glorify the Bible as ‘God's infallible Word', even though the Bible contains the very same abominable doctrines, and it is the Bible which is in fact the source of your interpretations. After having committed this act of hypocrisy, the religious critic will then proceed to quote from the authority of the Bible verse after verse in an attempt to condemn you with the words of the Bible, and this after they have just condemned themselves by condemning you which is just a way of condemning the Bible.

Apparently what we have exposed here is an interesting example of ‘the blind being led by the blind', for it would seem that in the midst of what seems to me to be their obvious and blatant hypocrisy, apparently they are not able to see just how inconsistent their position really is, and when they condemn you and your ‘racism' they are also condemning the Bible, which means that they are also condemning themselves. As I was saying, I find it all quite fascinating to observe.

One aspect of this experience that we do not seem to share is that I ‘receive messages', which then serves to assist me in my writing. This usually takes place in the form of symbolic communication, although on rare occasions I have also had a dream as well as some very weird experiences that I just don't want to talk about or even attempt to describe at the present time (it is all just to hard for people to hear and to accept, and I don't see much point being served by attempting to tell them those things which they will never be able to hear when it is already hard enough trying to communicate with them about the few things I do find it necessary to reveal).

This ‘receiving messages' is something new for me, and only began late in the summer of 2004, and was a very long time in coming. Before this time, as I look back, I can see that I was not receiving such messages, for the simple reason that I was not yet ready to hear and receive such messages, and it was required that I go through a process of becoming more informed about what was really going on in the world around me as opposed to what I thought was going on, and then once that process had advanced enough, I was then ready to receive and understand these messages. This then resulted in two sequences of ‘prophecy', one in November and December of 2004, followed by about six months of silence, and then another round lasting from July through into September of 2005, which like the one previous has now gone silent again, while I wait, perhaps for many months, for whatever needs to be done next. These messages can take the form of an ‘assignment', which is specific task that requires attention, encouragement, and even from time to time the rejection of an idea which then might require me to backtrack or toss out some page.

This experience gives me a unique perspective, which at the present time you do not share, and I can say that confidently, because I am familiar with what you are going through, and you are like I once was, which means that your understanding is confused and your personality and individuality have been under assault, leaving your messages and your emotions confused. So to be frank with you, while you may be qualified right now, through grace, to be making video tapes, and I support you whole heartedly in that endeavor, even so you are not qualified to be receiving and then giving messages. I know this to be true since your behavior is still erratic and you are still emotionally unstable, and I understand both the symptoms displayed as well as the underlying causes, which is what I was trying to point out to you in my previous communications. I speak now not of ‘theory' but rather from personal experience. I know, intimately, what I am talking about here, having been there, and done that myself, and as a consequence I understand you and given the similarities in our experiences, not just from up above, but also emotionally, I feel justified in speaking to you as a peer.

Now the one who I refer to as ‘my guardian angel' (the one who has the responsibility for encouraging me, and strengthening me, and seeing to it that I stay on message and fulfill my responsibilities) is someone who I trust explicitly, having experienced loyalty for many years, through thick and thin, as with great endurance and what must have been inexhaustible patience I was gradually brought to where I had to be. Given all the roadblocks and debris placed on the path to stop anyone from making it through the maze and coming out the other end, the process of getting someone through to the other side requires such massive patience, at least at the very start. Once someone makes it through to the other side, and navigates a safe path through those mine fields, the way is suddenly then open for others to make it through in a much shorter amount of time and with much less confusion and turmoil than I experienced, and which you are also experiencing, something which is obvious to me just by observing you.

Having said all this I can tell you that my guardian angel does not agree with your theological doctrine concerning ‘Christianity'. This is not what I was told, and we cannot both be right when we disagree so much as to be poles apart. At the same time I will remind you that it is my judgment that you are wrong about a lot of things right now, this being that phase you are going through, as you attempt the difficult struggle of navigating your way through an ancient mine field. There is nothing that is happening to you that is not common to anyone who found themselves in a similar situation and to this I can testify, having gone through the same ordeal myself.

Your instinctive rejection of the Christian doctrine and theology are correct. However the way in which you are integrating this intuitive understanding into your theology is not correct, and your wholesale rejection is also historically inaccurate.

Now the message of my guardian angel on this matter is as follows - a crucifixion is just a crucifixion. The instructions of my guardian angel are as follows - religion and theology are to be completely rejected, but the crucifixion is to be retained.

As I mentioned your rejection of Christian doctrine is correct, but your practice of then proceeding to throw the baby out with the bath water is wrong. Nevertheless, once again, you still find grace, but you should not confuse grace and the giving of free gifts that goes along with it, with an endorsement. After all, given how many times you also fail and get humiliated it should be quite clear to you that you are not being one hundred per cent endorsed by anyone up there, and therefore it should be clear to you, once you are able to emotionally accept the idea, that therefore not only are you not in control of the situation (you are like a clay pot on the potters wheel being made into something you probably don't yet see or understand) but you are also not completely right about everything. Therefore the process takes place where you are humbled and you fail and experience a humiliation which then places healthy doubts about your doctrines into the minds of people, because that is what your angels require. I agree with them, because otherwise you would be dangerous.

I point these things out to you in the hopes of being able to penetrate your defensive wall of denial so that perhaps you might be more willing to listen to what I have to say, for you see, what I have to say is not just what I have to say, because I am not very interested in just what I have to say, but rather I am interested in the truth. When it comes to things I know nothing about, and in particular when it comes to history that I know nothing about, I rely on the testimony of those who are in a position to know what I do not know. I am able therefore to do some fact checking, which is not something you have done up to this time, and this is the result of being in the position of relying on yourself since you are still spinning on that potter's wheel and thus are not yet receptive to understanding any messages.

What I have decided to do is to ‘preach the gospel' as I have received it, and since this is something that I feel still is left undone, I feel that talking about his matter with you will be a good way to clear my thoughts and get some things down on paper that I feel need to be clearly defined in any case.

The Crucifixion

Now as my guardian angel states, a crucifixion is just a crucifixion, and that is all that a crucifixion is. If someone were to suggest that a crucifixion was not just a crucifixion but was in fact something altogether different, then we can begin to question their motives in that we must wonder why someone would want to muddy the waters with their hooves.

Crucifixion was a method of state sponsored terrorism, and its purpose was to inspire the level of terror required in order to keep Roman slaves working and producing all the wealth of the Roman empire. A good example of this sort of thing can be found when you consider the slave revolt led by Spartacus, after which the Imperial Roman power responded with a display of appalling cruelty and oppression by lining all the roads into Rome with the spectacle of five thousand crucified slaves suffering and dying and then being left to rot on five thousand crosses. Testimony which survives from that time suggests that the smell of rotting corpses was abhorrent as the display of dominance and ruthlessness continued on even after death.

The purpose of the display was to inspire terror in the rest of the slaves of the Roman Empire, and thus disavow them of any further attempts at liberation. Since no one can get really rich by themselves, since that would require them to do the work of tens or hundreds or thousands of other human beings, wealthy Romans required large numbers of compliant slaves to do the labor required to then generate the opulent wealth and splendor that the oppressors in Rome so craved. Since no one will willingly do slave labor for someone else, they must be forced into the life of slavery using violence combined with terror, and it was to inspire this level of fear and docility that crucifixion was employed.

This is to state the obvious. And it is obvious. Or at least in most cases it would be obvious, and crucifixion is only obscured when it happens to be the Christian crucifixion, which we are told, was not a crucifixion in the classic sense of the term, but rather something else altogether different.

Crucifixion as message

When we forget about religion, and think only of crucifixion, it then becomes possible to discern a clear message embedded in the symbol of the cross, if we interpret this message as a message of God. We notice some similarities here between the older Jewish tradition of the rescue of slaves from the slave driver, and thus we can assume that the message of the crucifixion is in continuity with this earlier message, and interestingly enough we can see that the two messages do correspond, which we would expect to be the case if that were in fact a message from God. And so the cross can then be said to carry an identical message, which if it was to be put into words would be, ‘Let my people go.'

Reactionary Politics

Now the Christian message has never been, ‘let my people go,' and the reason for this is that the cross of religion is not a crucifixion, but rather it has been transformed so that the orthodox Christian crucifixion is not a crucifixion but has become something else. Therefore the message also changed, and so it is that we do not hear Christians preaching ‘let my people go' but rather we hearing them preaching something else. Christians preach obedience to slaves, which is an entirely different message, since the Christian message and theology was cobbled together by priests who were part of a rising powerful elite.

The reason why a Christian today would be found to be preaching something else is uncovered when we understand the political message of the cross. Just as Pharaoh was humiliated by the message he received, so too was Caesar humiliated, and interestingly enough, they were both humiliated for the same reason. They were oppressors and they were guilty of monstrous cruelty. They were bullies and the true purpose of ‘religion', if you want to call it that (I hesitate to call it that) was to give a vicious bully his comeuppance. You don't see Christians today confronting bullies, or defending the weak and the helpless from their vicious attacks, but rather you see Christians lining up to attack weaker members of society, such as gay people, because Christians today have a different cross, which is not a crucifixion in the classical sense, but rather is something else altogether different, thus explaining why Christians preach a foreign and strange message.

Now if one were to change the meaning of crucifixion, it is obvious that one was offended by the message. Keep in mind here that in addition to political reasons there were also strong economic motives for powerful church fathers to alter the meaning of the crucifixion, in that the preservation of wealth and power required crucifixion, since it required slaves, and there just is no way to practice slavery without being a vicious tyrannical bully. There are many ways of bullying and terrorizing another human being, and crucifixion is just an extreme example of bullying, taken to its most atrocious extreme by the rich and the powerful of the world. Therefore, if one wants more bullying, and wants to protect the economic base as well as the rich and the powerful of Rome, then one needs to change the meaning of the crucifixion so that it becomes about something else, thus making it possible for two thousand years of extra bullying to take place without anyone making a big fuss. Thus the Christian religion became a religion of terror and bullying, since it was no longer about crucifixion, but became about something else, and the form it took is best understood in the light of politics and economic necessity. Indeed, it will be shown, after changing the meaning of the crucifixion, it would then be possible to justify further bullying, going so far as to make the Jesus figure an atrociously cruel bully breathing terrible threats and promising torture to any disobedient slave, thus completing the square. Thus the Jesus figure was transformed into Caesar, and like Caesar, became a torturer and oppressor himself.

The message of the Christian crucifixion, once religion and theology have been hurled onto the scrap heap of history, can be summarized in words by such sayings as the following. "Caesar crucifies slaves, but God rescues his victims by raising them from the dead." For you see, you cannot have Caesar committing abominable acts of cruelty and barbarism, and then have God coming up behind and raising Caesar's victims from the dead, without leaving Caesar just as disgraced as that Pharaoh must have been to have taken a licking at the hand of God for being a revolting tyrant and a bully.

However, if crucifixion is not a crucifixion, but is actually something else quite different, then we can see how Caesar might actually develop a fondness for that Christian religion, given enough time to get used to the idea, and might actually decide to make that religion the official religion, since it wasn't a humiliating disgrace any more. It had changed so much that it actually became possible to go on torturing people while still having a church with a cross on the steeple in the empire, since that church had a new message which not only failed to condemn torture and bullying, but was so reversed that it actually justified torturing people and could then go on to prop up the powerful status quo, which then became the new job of churches.

Justifying the State

Christianity accomplished this task of justifying the state and saving Caesar by altering the meaning of the crucifixion, so that the message no longer was ‘let my people go,' but instead the story became that ‘Jesus came to die on the cross for your sins and for my sins.' Apparently when a divine god like being incarnated in human form and then bled to death on a cross, this resulted in the ‘remission of sins' for those who ‘accepted his substitution for them on the cross' thus leading to the ‘salvation of the world.' Not all the world, mind you, but just the salvation of that part of the world that agreed to go to church and obey priests and learn their doctrines (since it turns out that just believing in Jesus is not enough at the end of it all, since there are piles of doctrines that must be memorized and accepted, for people go right straight to hell for having mistaken doctrines, and it is also a criminal offense to be different or unique in any way, since everyone must believe and think in precisely the identical way.)

Now when we say that ‘Jesus died for our sins' we are saying that ‘he took our place on the cross', which is another way of saying that ‘he suffered the penalty for our sins.' For as it is said, ‘that should have been me on that cross, but Christ died for me, taking my place.' It is also said that from birth, every human deserves to be crucified by Caesar, and if that is not bad enough, if they are not ‘saved' by repeating certain slogans, they will have even worse tortures done to them by Jesus after they are dead. You can see hear that the cruelty of Caesar actually pales into insignificance compared to the monstrous tortures of the newly risen Jesus, who after surviving torture himself, promptly decided to take up the practice himself, and this explains why we see Jesus on a throne followed by Caesar on a throne on all those paintings on those church walls, since that is where this newly minted church Jesus belongs, since he was created for that very purpose.

The function of this ‘theology' (as that clear political manipulation is called) is to justify a torturer by justifying torture, and this is what Christian doctrine does. Torture is normalized by this doctrine, and the result, when combined with the monstrous genocides and other crimes of the priestly Bible, is the creation of the intolerant and generally unloving, unfeeling persecuting Christian we are all so familiar with, the type who have become so numbed to human suffering that they can put up with every known form of cruelty and bullying by the powerful of the state. This is the end product of Christian doctrine. It produces Christians and the best condemnation of Christian theology is the Christians it produces.

The Reactionary Gospel

It is worth noting here that the Christian gospel is not ‘Let my people go'. As the documents the church fathers saw fit to approve as ‘canon' and ‘sacred scripture' state, ‘Slaves, obey your masters, with fear and trembling, as you obey Christ, not only while being watched.' This is then followed by the famous ‘pie in the sky when you die' passage, so famous of Christian priests, wherein it states that by being obedient slaves who fearfully obey, while it is true that they will have to slave to produce wealth for the powerful, they will get a big pie from Jesus after they are dead if they are good slaves down here.

This doctrine epitomizes the true purpose of Christian theology. So here we have a Moses who says to the powerful, ‘Keep my people' rather than ‘let my people go' and to the slaves he he says, ‘let my slaves do slave labor.' To facilitate this upside down religion Christianity then employed lots of terrorism and bullying, since Christianity was the religion of the status quo, designed by and for elites, and they were bullies and still are to this day, and so religion is bullying and torturous and hierarchical and domineering as well.

This, latter message, and not the former, is the true message of the Christian religion (‘let my people slave'), and that Christianity could then be found on the side of Caesar is the inevitable consequence of the alteration of the meaning of the crucifixion. The doctrine of ‘Jesus, who died for our sins' justifies torture, and it also justifies Caesar and the status quo of the Imperial state by white washing the meaning of a crucifixion, achieving this task by changing the meaning of a crucifixion so that it is no longer an act of terrorism and atrocious bullying, but rather becomes ‘a payment for sin.'

There are therefore two Christian doctrines, and it is also true that there are two earlier Jewish doctrines. The source of the Christian doctrine is an earlier Jewish forgery. The purpose of the Jewish priestly forgeries was to change the meaning of the Jewish religion, just as Christian theology changed the meaning of the Christian religion. It is no surprise then to find that just as the Jewish story of the saving of the slaves is found to be in continuity with the symbol of the crucifixion, so it is also the case that there is a direct line of continuity between the forgeries of Jewish priests and the forged and falsified gospel of the supposedly ‘orthodox' Christian priests, one forgery following upon the other, and building upon the other, for the very same purpose of obscuring the message of liberation, and replacing it with a message of oppression and domination. In both cases slavery and torturous punishments were again justified and it was the system of exploitation that was then saved, and not humanity in either case. There is no salvation in religion.

Anyone familiar with the writings of the Jewish prophets would recall that one of the recurring themes of their writings was conflict with the priests and the temple cult of the day, with their criticism of that system of religion being that it was false and worthless, and consisted only of what Isaiah referred to as ‘the doctrines of priests which these people then memorize off by heart.' While these people were busy with worthless religious practices, such as ritually killing and mutilating cattle and other live stock, the poor and the oppressed were being brutally exploited and not a word of protest was heard from the religious. This is no surprise, since the purpose of that fraudulent religion was, like the Christian religion that came later, to perpetuate brutal exploitation, and so that such negligence was seen to result is no surprise but rather everything turned out just as it was planned. In this way the rise of the Christian forgery gives us some additional insight into the protests of earlier Jewish prophets in that it illustrates in even clearer terms the purposes of the earlier fraudulent religious practices of earlier generations of Jewish priests.

Jeremiah wrote of that religion,

‘burn your whole offerings and eat the flesh yourselves. For on the day that I brought your ancestors out of Egypt I gave them no instructions or commands concerning whole offerings and sacrifice. But they did not listen they paid no heed, and went ahead with their own plans with the most stubbornly evil hearts. Speak to them, but they will not listen to you. Tell them this, but they will refuse to respond. And then say to them, ‘here is the generation that has rejected YAHWEH, and refuses all correction. Now truth has perished from their lips and is no longer heard in the land...The stork in the heavens knows the time to migrate, but now my people do not know the requirements of YAHWEH. How can you say, ‘we are wise, for we have the Torah (the law of God) when actually the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie. Their leaders are dismayed, for they have been trapped and snared. But they rejected the Word of YAHWEH, so what kind of wisdom did they have. Therefore I will give your wives to other men and your fields to new owners, for everyone both high and low is out for ill gotten gain. Priests and prophets are all frauds. Even in God's house I find their evil deeds. They dress my people's wound as though it were not serious, saying to them ‘All is well.'" (Jeremiah 7:21, 8:8)

It is interesting to note here that the Bible is not ‘the infallible and inerrant Word of God,' for it is plainly obvious that no book which contains such a ringing condemnation of such documents as Leviticus could be ‘without error.' It is obvious then that only the most atrocious hypocritical liar is the one who goes on insisting that the bible is ‘the inerrant Word of God.' It is worth noting here that the best selling translation of the bible, the NIV, which was translated by the evangelical fundamentalist movement, deliberately mistranslates what Jeremiah has to say, nullifying the prophet for the sake of their own human traditions, and they do many other things just like that. This sort of hypocritical conduct is a ringing endorsement of Jeremiah's testimony and a further condemnation of priestly religion and its doctrines and theologies, for we see that once again their scribes are making the document into a lie, and doing so once again on the very same subject as that condemned by Jeremiah. So then we can modernize Jeremiah's polemic, by saying to those who use this prolifically printed NIV Bible, ‘how can you say, ‘we are wise, for we have the Infallible Word of God, when actually the lying pen of your translating scribes has made it into a lie.'

The NIV is mistranslated because the scribes understood clearly the significance of Jeremiah's polemic, and they nullified the prophet in order to save their own traditional doctrine, since it turns out to be the case that the substitute Christian doctrine is based upon the forgeries of the animal sacrifices and whole offerings of the Jewish priests. If these doctrines of sacrificing animals to pay for sin were proved to be forgeries, this then would mean that two thousand years of Christian theology was also forgery, that Paul was no apostle but rather at best confused and at worst an imperialist fraud masquerading as an apostle. The church would then be stuck with a naked crucifixion, with no theology to hide its meaning, and then all the hard work the church did in propping up imperialism and systems of domination and exploitation would turn out to be for nothing, as the crucifixion then destroyed religion by exposing its brazen hypocrisy to the light of day. Confronted with this prospect the scribes choose to falsify the document, which is interesting, one forgery committed to defend and protect and previous forgery all in the interests of preserving and protecting the theology of a religion which is itself a forgery. Apparently, forgeries are vital for the salvation of the world, thus explaining this notorious display of hypocrisy. Apparently it is not the truth but rather the lie that will set people free, or at least one would hope so, given how persistently people are being deceived and lied from the pulpits of so many of their churches.

The Gospel

We can still determine what the ‘Word of God' is in spite of religion and theology, if we are determined to know nothing but the crucifixion. The message of the Gospel is ‘Let my people go.' The preaching of this gospel does not depend on the so called ‘wisdom of human beings' nor does it rely on the endless justifications of theology but rather it carries within itself the conviction of spiritual power, so that those who hear the message of the gospel and believe it have their faith based firmly upon the power of God, rather than upon doctrine or human argumentation. Now my purpose here is not to condemn Christians, but by exposing and destroying the deceitfulness of religion it is my hope to open some eyes and hopefully it might be possible to save some of them from their religion. For as it stands now my people do not know the requirements of God.

All these things become self evident once the advice of my guardian angel is followed a person determines to believe that a crucifixion is just a crucifixion, for this is obvious, and once this liberation from doctrine and theology is achieved the cross then begins to illuminate the truth about God which religion only serves to obscure. Religion then, it would seem, is actually the creation of cynical atheists, who actually care nothing about God, but whose true agenda is the preservation of the state and, as Jeremiah stated so bluntly, just as the Torah was defiled in the interests of greedy gain, so to the Christian doctrine was corrupted for the very same reason, the purpose being to protect concentrations of wealth and power by manufacturing obedient slaves (and thus the main virtue of a Christian is ‘obedience to the authority' under that fabricated system of worship, since this obedience is required if wealth is to be extracted through the exploitation of humanity, and it is obvious that it is preferable to exploit the compliant rather than to be forced to terrorize the ‘disobedient' with acts of cruelty such as crucifixion, which achieves the same purpose as religion, but is much more work, and during times of revolution has been known to fail, having sown the seeds of its destruction...religion is preferable since the system of domination it creates offers the promise of greater permanence and an enhanced stability of the social systems of exploitation).

Reflections on the Cross

Therefore we can see that the best way to hang a Dragon is to give a Dragon rope. That Dragon will then proceed to hang itself. This is a strange notion that most people would find hard to accept, since in their minds the best way to hang a Dragon would be to grab a Dragon and hang that Dragon and just get it over with, but we see here, if we can see, is that Dragon's are best left to hang themselves. Of course that means that Dragons will be hanging a lot of people in the meantime, thus destroying the faith of the world by doing so, but if you think long term that will prove to be the end of Dragon's, and it since it is best to allow Dragon's to destroy themselves, Dragon's need to be given a lot of rope. What this means then, if you have faith, and you can think long term, is that it is not the crucified who are ultimately disgraced and humiliated but rather it turns out that it is those who crucify who are brought to disgrace, for it turns out that during the time they were being given all that rope, they thought they saw an opportunity there, and thus proceeded to build a gallows for themselves.

A Unified Field Theory

The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.

Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs