The fly on the manure pile

Thought for today...There is only one force on earth that can hijack and destroy a revolution and that is 'progressive thought' and union leaders. If anyone wants to know how some idiot like Hitler was able to beat a revolution, there is your answer.

Hillary Rodham Clinton - International War Criminal

Hillary was a keynote speaker at the annual meeting of the Democratic Leadership Council, held this year in Columbus Ohio, in mid July. In her speech at the convention she called for a more aggressive ‘fight against terrorists', as though the woman did not understand, as I am sure she should be able to understand, that the biggest terrorists on earth are not some small time outfit like Al Queda, but the right wing terrorists working for the rich and the wealthy around the world, who commit repeated daily terrorist attacks against the weak and the helpless poor in third world nations around the world every day, as Imperialist Colonialism continues its vampire like blood sucking, having only gone under cover over the past few decades, in the hopes of not getting caught. You can compare these constant monstrous attacks of terrorism by the rich and the powerful targeting liberation priests and nuns, human rights workers, union organizers, and anyone else who fights for the defenseless or dares to speak for the voiceless, with the nonexistent threat of Al Queda, an outfit that as everyone knows is not very busy, and thus hardly a threat worthy of destroying democracy and bringing in Nazism and fascism as the supposedly appropriate response.

Now I understand that there may still be some people around who might consider Hillary to be some kind of ‘progressive' and that Democratic party to be some kind of standard bearer for the cause of justice, but the actual facts speak for themselves. In her speech Hillary described a militarized society, with many more troops in uniform, ready to do battle with the nonexistent threat of Al Queda, which is a mask for militaristic imperialist colonialism, such as that obviously illegal law breaking war in Iraq, something I am sure Hillary would know, the woman not being a total moron I would assume. Similarly, continuing the brazen push of her imperialistic viewpoint, the woman criticized the war crime in Iraq, on the basis so typical of the Democratic party, which is to insist that more troops need to be committed to Iraq to crush the War of Liberation in that country.

Which makes Hillary a war criminal, as well as all those other Democrats who continue to call for more American blood to be spilled in the pursuit of that obviously criminal enterprise in Iraq, since Hillary, and the Democrats, just like the Republicans and the rest of that rotted out elitist system, have decided to arrogantly wipe their ass with the International War Crimes legislation, an interesting position to be taking in that this means that you reveal yourself as a Nazi worthy of full prosecution under the law, but I would suppose that Hillary, like the rest of them, is full of that same arrogant hubris of the rich and the powerful of this world, that somehow makes them think that they are so powerful that now they are above the law, and thus have nothing to worry about.

So then if you find some ‘progressive' type or some ‘liberal' who is pushing for Hillary, or perhaps has some mild criticisms for Hillary because of her new found religious right influences, or if it should be the case that some Democrats start doing that thing where they encourage everyone to turn out as one big herd to vote for Elmer Fudd, if that would be what it would take to stop some Republican, and if Elmer Fudd turns out to be Hillary on that particular occasion, you might want to ask them if being a Nazi War Criminal in violation of every War Crime Law on the books, not to mention a raft of other laws going back to the Magna Carta, is like some kind of trivial detail to the progressive movement or your typical Democrat type voter, assuming there are any such people remaining in the country, now that the Democrats are revealing their true agenda, by moving to the right of Bush, and demanding more hawkish imperialism, so as to curry the favor of the elite have mores, the capitalists of America, since the Democrats know what the capitalists want, and thus tailor their agenda to that agenda, no matter how atrocious that might seem to a Democrat type voter.

If they still love Hillary, then you might want to ask that ‘progressive' or that ‘Democrat' why they would be willing to take such a morally depraved stand...could it be the cottage...or perhaps its the BMW.

The fly on the manure pile

Now as I have stated in the past, I am an ‘anarcho-socialist'. My goal is the establishment of the world's very first new born democracy, to replace this current rotted out system of musical chairs elitism put in place as a form of strategic retreat by the ruling elites during the American Revolution, the whole system being designed by the wealthiest upper class of America at the time (George Washington, for example, being the richest man in the country at that time). The specific purpose of the design of that thing masquerading as a ‘democracy' was to thwart populism from below through deception, by channeling everything through the hands of elites, so they could gut and cut and protect their own interests, while at the same time creating a nation of pan handlers who were trained from birth that democracy meant going pan handling for favors from elitists, this pan handling then constituting ‘political activism' under the musical chairs elitist system, keeping it safely corralled in those ‘protest pens', and thus kept within the confines of that system, for by ‘protesting' that system you are validating that system and conceding to it both power and authority by your participation in that soul sucking spirit draining fraud of engaging in constant, endless class warfare, which will then be called a ‘progressive struggle' and celebrated as something heroic.

Being an anarcho-socialist, I don't think to much of it all...

If we look back over human history we note that humanity has been plagued by sociopaths and monsters in high places who slaughtered and destroyed and cut a path of murderous destruction and suffering across the face of the earth throughout history, and given that humanity has always existed under tyranny, never having known democracy in all its history, naturally elitists have framed history to give such mass murderers titles such ‘Alexander the Great', while scholars who have bought into the system, and are apparently not much disturbed by blood and guts, celebrate what are called their accomplishments, since apparently a humane pacifist couldn't be expected to accomplish much, these sorts of things having only been done by carving humanity up like a turkey.

It is a great truth that where you have a manure pile, you will attract flies. So therefore, when people say, ‘Give us a King to rule over us', that proves to be an idiotic idea, since manure piles attract flies.

I am not an ‘anarcho-socialist' simply because I threw a dart at a dartboard, and lo and behold, the dart landed on ‘anarcho-socialist' so therefore I decided to choose that option. The way I see it, is that when you are having a revolution, and you are trying to decide on what new system should arise on the earth, you want to struggle to come up with something that isn't going to come back to haunt everyone later. Your motives then are not to be heralded as some theoretical genius, so people can build a statue of you, nor are you out to push your pet project and then walk around with something stuck up your ass if your idea doesn't fly, but rather you are committed to the well being of humanity. Thus rather than ‘celebrating diversity' you become committed to tending a garden, and as everyone knows who has ever taken care of a garden, that means using a hoe to get rid of weeds. Therefore when you have ‘diversity' you start weeding. You also adopt a different attitude than that which currently prevails in a place like America, where you celebrate elitists, and thus the argument is always framed around what Jefferson really meant or what Washington really intended in some paragraph. As any gardener knows, you weed a garden repeatedly if you have to, and you don't stop weeding just because someone says that Jefferson did all the weeding in the springtime, thus making further weeding some kind of offense to tradition.

So therefore, it follows that it is not required that one be one hundred per cent correct and just flawless in perfection, but rather that one be flexible and not dogmatic or bogged down by traditionalism, understanding full well that a garden might need some more weeding, should some weeds appear later on in the year.

It is the doctrine of the ‘progressive movement' which states that when you have a manure pile system, the correct thing to do is to get a bunch of people to stand around that manure pile armed with fly swatters, ready to smack any fly that gets near the manure pile. This is the ‘progressive solution' to that manure pile, and you will find that progressives will fight every effort to get rid of the manure pile, insisting that the fly swatter strategy makes such ‘revolutionary tactics' quite unnecessary, since they already took care of the problem with that menacing fly, by coming up with a new progressive strategy in the form of just one more of those fly swatters.

So therefore, it follows, that you can always tell when you have a system in place which is actually a manure pile when the theoretical implications of that manure pile problem begins to drive people towards the only possible solution, the devising of fly swatters. Keep in mind the exhausting work involved in swatting the inevitable hordes of flies that will be attracted to the aforementioned manure pile, and while there are those who might want to celebrate the glorious history of our ancestors and their struggle with all those flies, I think a sensible person can see that getting rid of the manure pile is the more sensible choice, since you then eliminate the struggle, glorious as it might be to struggle all your life long, that sort of thing apparently being some kind of hobby for some people, which they love and can't imagine giving up, although I myself am damned sick and tired of it all, thus being a lazy revolutionary, rather than a hard working progressive.

Capitalism as a giant manure pile

Throughout human history we have found Ted Bundy to be really attracted by the aroma of that giant manure pile, bringing untold suffering to the human race, for as glorious as the struggle with that fly has been, as we know very well from past history right up to the present time of disaster for humanity, despite all the most exhausting efforts devising and then employing fly swatters, somehow that Ted Bundy always manages to find a way to get up on that manure pile. From its lofty heights Ted can then roll up balls of turds to begin pelting everyone below, while the inevitable great struggle from below must begin as everyone tries to get that fly off the manure pile and save the world yet one more time, with a lot of people being crushed to death under big mounds of shit by that fly in the process.

So we see then that every system under the rule of elitists becomes hierarchical and authoritarian. It is not surprising then to find that humanity lives under capitalism, which is just the latest ideological justification for human inequality and the privileges of elitists. For you see, from time to time it is required that elitists change their ideology the way people change socks, this happening when the conditions no longer support whatever bullshit ideology they were using to deceive the human race in previous historical times. That form of ideological bullshit known as ‘capitalism' is just the latest in a long line of such fabrications used to justify the imperialistic domination of elites over the rest of humanity. Given that elites wipe their asses after using the toilet, and given how much their shit stinks, there is no justification for elitism, and this being the great truth humanity intuitively understands, it then just logically follows that every ideology that attempts to justify inequality and elitism is therefore unethical and riddled with lies, and cannot be otherwise, since there is a filthy lie and deception at the very root core of that ideology, and nothing but a big pile of lies can ever be constructed upon a foundation of lies. It is not surprising then to find that capitalism is just such a pack of fraudulent and decietful lies, and that the whole system is a bloodstained whore masquerading as some kind of saint. It is also interesting to note that it is required that a murderous whore dress up like some kind of nun, since no is ever to be found here dressed up as a murderous whore but always appears in public dressed like a nun or a saint, saving that whole business of being vampiric whore to be done privately behind closed drapes.

Capitalism as a naked whore

However from time to time it is required, if one is to get anything done, to be a naked whore, and forget the whole business of dressing up like a nun. A good example of this is the shocking provocation of the obvious breaking of every single one of the International War Crimes laws which has taken place in Iraq. One can go down the list and find that not even one of those anti- Nazi laws has not been broken, while the constitution and the laws of the land going back to the Magna Carta are under full scale attack. One must assume that blood sucking vampire whore only staggers around in public stark naked after a long night of drinking, for if she was sober, we would expect her to appear in public in her usual nun outfit, while doing that murderous whore thing after dark, where no one can see her, as has always been in her custom in the past, and explains why she insists on the creation of giant media monopoly, controlled by her and her alone, since she can get away with a lot more murder and theft while worrying less about getting caught if she is allowed to duct tape the mouths of the media to keep them quiet about it all.

The bar tender and the Whore

Now when one sees a drunken murderous whore staggering around in her own vomit and stepping right on piles of her own shit, and other astonishing sights such as these, one must ask what she could have been drinking last night. Whatever ever she mixed up for herself, it must have been a pretty strong cup, because she hasn't been seen this drunk within the memory of most people. She has been known to tipple from time to time, but she has been mixing her drinks particularly strong lately, since apparently she has a lot on her mind, and thus feels the need for a stiff drink. During the hours when she is sober, if she ever is sober, I imagine that she spends all her time trying to figure out some way to get herself out of the terrible mess she got herself into as her plans failed and her plots backfired on her, the intractable nature of those unsolvable problems worrying her so that she takes to drinking heavily, leading to the scandalous conduct we see before our very eyes today.

King George bellies up to the bar

All of which leads me to wonder if King George has hit the bottle again, for I cannot imagine anyone being under that kind of stress, and still keeping to their Christian resolve to never touch liquor again. But then again, when you consider that King George never was a Christian in the first place, as his deeds and conduct so clearly demonstrate, he may as well start drinking again, since it is not likely that he would lose his salvation if he did so, since you can't lose something you never had in the first place.

The Counter Revolution

As everyone should know by now, there is a revolution underway globally, and the signs of the revolution are emerging everywhere. For example, we have seen that the IRA is now switching over to the pacifist strategy, which isn't a surprise, since apparently someone convinced them that they could do a lot more damage that way, and being the damaging kind of revolutionary outfit that the IRA is, naturally when something comes along that is really damaging, it isn't long before they jump on board. All of which makes Tony Blair really sad, as you could see with your own eyes if you watch the footage of Tony ‘celebrating' the new pacifism of the IRA. While of course it is required that we ‘celebrate' the new found pacifist strategy of the IRA, thus explaining why Tony would do his bit by doing some ‘celebrating' himself, the truth of the matter is that Tony is really unhappy about that particular revolutionary development, for he knows that the IRA is now switching to a new strategy of employing high explosives, while searching for weapons of mass destruction to unleash against England and Ireland, and something like that is bound to give someone a long face, and make them really sad. At the moment that minister Paisley is not to sad, being apparently to brutishly stupid to understand what Tony understands, but I would suppose when the new pacifist IRA detonates their first WMD even someone as dimwitted as Paisley will probably get clued in soon enough, once he sees the destruction that results from the new and much more deadly explosive charges about to be employed by the new IRA. All of which makes me delighted, because I really love big explosions and nuclear tipped WMDs and mass destruction and terrorism, provided that the right people are being terrorized, and this being the IRA we are talking about here, I am sure that the right people are either in terror right now, or are really sad about it like Tony Blair, leaving only really dumb pricks like that evil oppressor Paisley to still not understand what this revolutionary development really means for the English ruling class.

One of the clearest signs of the emerging revolution is that lovely counter revolution which is underway, and can also be seen everywhere, in particular if you tune in to the capitalist media system from time to time, and gird yourself with some cast iron around your stomach, thus allowing you to sample the counter revolutionary menu being served up at such venues. So then I am both delighted by this lovely counter revolution at the same time I feel like puking in disgust, this being a counter revolution after all. But I would be so disappointed if there was not a lovely counter revolution rising up from the earth, for that would be a break with all human tradition, since there has never been a revolution, without a counter revolution.

For example those nasty Iraqis have started making terror videos again, thus proving that I cannot write letters to a ‘terrorist' and reason with them, and also proving that you cannot get rid of terrorism by draining the swamp, but rather you must build up the Military Industrial Complex and spend fifty of sixty years hunting down the terrorists and killing them all, as our wonderful counter revolutionary media has been reminding everyone at ever chance. I thought it was unfortunate that in another one of those remarkably badly timed coincidences, the Iraqi resistance chose to go back into the making of terror videos after being out of business for eight months since I wrote to them last November, timing their latest attacks with the rising counter revolution. It is just such an inconvenient time for me, only being convenient for the forces of the counter revolution, and given how I was able to talk to the IRA and change their strategy to one of utter destruction, one has to wonder why I can no longer talk to the Iraqis, now that they are becoming more violent than ever before, as our counter revolutionary media keeps assuring me is the case.

Yes, our media system is performing its job as lap dog of the elite imperialists with admirable mendacity, as is appropriate for a counter revolution, and if you are asking yourself, ‘how is the revolution doing' or if you are baking bread, and you are wondering if the dough is rising, you can always check with the forces of the counter revolution, which will become increasingly shrill the more that dough rises, giving you a way to check on that dough and determine approximately when it might be the time to bake that loaf by throwing it into the oven.

Thus you can see that the counter revolutionary forces function as a kind of egg timer for busy cooks.

Stepping on the gas pedal

We know that the capitalists felt that Hitlerism would be full grown and ready to take over complete power sometime before the year 2010, since this is the date which was given when Africa would get some debt relief, capitalists not being that much interested in giving Africa debt relief right now, since that would mean not only giving up a monthly cheque, but would also ruin that globalization plot which relies heavily on using extortion on the poor and indebted as a kind of crow bar and claw hammer to batter down all resistance to their gluttonous plot to own everything on the face of the earth.

However, I believe in always being one step ahead of a capitalist, so that should a capitalist decide to cross a bridge, by the time the capitalist got to the bridge it would be found that I was there already and blew the thing sky high, which is the best way to be a revolutionary. A revolutionary is not a reactionary. That is the task of the capitalist.

If you get some infestation of bugs in a house, people will fumigate the place. Similarly, if you have an infestation of Hitler, it just logically follows that you spray the joint with Hitercide, a specially formulated pesticide which is just guaranteed to kill Hitler. It also makes sense to spray the place with Hitlercide before the bugs over run the place, at which time it might still be possible to spray the place with Hitlercide, but it would be a slow process what with doors being kicked down and the joint searched for hidden cans of Hitlercide, and people disappearing to places like Treblinka to put a stop to any more of that lethal spraying.

So therefore with the place being fumigated ahead of time, keeping one step ahead of that capitalist, which is the right way to do everything, it therefore logically follows that a capitalist might as well forget about Hitlerism, that particular bridge having been blown sky high already, and thus no longer available as a crossing point. However, things being what they are, a capitalist with no ideas, having been reduced to a reactionary, and not used to being on the losing side of class warfare, will nevertheless do something really stupid by stepping on the old gas pedal and throwing that previous time table out of the window, by bringing in Hitlerism right away. Yesterday would not be soon enough, from the point of view of that capitalist.

We should not be surprised then to see that capitalist mouth organ, that counter revolutionary outfit, the capitalist media system, so vigorously beating that dead horse, the London Bombing, which in the brain dead thought style of the ruling class, therefore justifies further class warfare and attacks on civil liberties, not to mention more global imperialist military attacks. We should also expect more terrorism alerts, jumping to red from time to time, and then another bombing, followed by more hysteria, as a bipartisan effort by those war criminals the Democrats and the Republicans respond to that terrible terrible ‘terrorist' attack with a full scale last ditch attempt to bring in Hitlerism, even though it is already to late to bring in Hitler.

But a capitalist with no strategy is a capitalist found to be doing utterly stupid strategies instead. At this point in time all a capitalist can do is make things worse, not something that would appeal to a capitalist, having already been driven to drink by all those other problems, as I mentioned before, but nevertheless, as shocking as it sounds, a capitalist will go ahead and make things even worse by behaving like reckless drunk, and doing ever more of than naked parading around in public, falling into puddles of vomit, and walking right through piles of their own shit, since the capitalist cannot harm the revolution and therefore might as well help the revolution instead. If The capitalist does nothing, the revolution succeeds, and if a capitalist does something, the revolution succeeds, and so given that bad choice, a capitalist might as well become a reckless drunk and just kill some time before the inevitable outcome comes to pass.

The immorality of the Union Leader

Another sign of the rising revolution is the sudden surge in activity in the union leadership, which included just a couple of weeks ago a split in the AFL-CIO over the new strategy of ‘Change to Win.' Yes it is time for those Union leaders to change, and as for their sudden new found fondness for change and ‘winning' well that is best explained by their sudden new found awareness that revolutionary forces are unleashed on the earth, and given how union leaders are not very fond of revolution, and prefer counter revolution instead, it is not surprising to see them getting real busy, and I expect them to be even busier in the days ahead as that loaf continues to rise, thus providing me with another one of those egg timers I can use to test the progress of that dough rising process. All of this can best be explained by the fact the chief concern of a union leader is and has always been the protection of their own jobs.

I could say a lot about union leaders. For example I could point out how those union leaders have helped the capitalists in their globalization plot by preventing workers from striking when their jobs were being sent to the third world so that capitalist could run sweat shops and make big profits. We can see from past experience that the a union leader actually leads one of those sovietized style ‘unions' that are actually an appendage of the system and not a union at all, as you can tell by their track record.

Yes I could say a lot about union leaders and point out that their sudden concern is not generated by a surprising surge of love for humanity, but rather by the revolution, and by reminding people that union leaders are only getting hopping because they are part of the counter revolution (with a little luck they can keep their jobs, which is their only big concern right now).Yes, I could say a lot, but I was doing some thinking, and I thought that perhaps the best way to deal with a counter revolutionary, like that union leaders, would be to come up with another offer, and they can get put their offer on the table, and then people can compare offers. That might be the best way to deal with a counter revolutionary like that union leaders.

The task of a counter revolutionary like that Union leader is to offer some kind of bribe which will then convince the worker to participate in a system of evil oppression. For example a union leader might convince a worker to hate Bolivians, because they are poor, and thus a capitalist might give their job to a Bolivian for a buck an hour, thus causing a worker to hate a Bolivian and regard that impoverished Bolivian as a threat, when, if you used your thinking cap, a worker should be hating a capitalist for being such disgusting greedy shit who exploits the weak and the helpless of the world, and then uses that as a sledge hammer to get rid of your pension or something like that. A union leader would not want a worker thinking such thoughts, because that would be revolutionary, and then that union leader would not be powerful in the sovietized system, having lost a very well paying upper income job. That union leader would then be out looking for a job as a worker, which sends chills up and down the spine of a union leader I am sure, especially when you consider the plunge from six or maybe even seven figure incomes that would entail. Thus a union leader will be keeping busy, stirring up bigotry perhaps, creating trouble of one kind or another, which should provide me with material for another column on some day should the well run dry (which seems unlikely around a place like this one).

Yes, your union leader or your congressman could start stirring up racism against that poor Bolivian who is threatening your job, and you, the worker, can then get pissed off at the Bolivian, instead of being pissed off at that capitalist, which is the whole point of your union leader and congressman stirring up trouble in the first place (apparently they think you, the worker, are some dumb shit) and as a consequence of your immoral choice you, the worker, wind up paying for your unethical conduct later when that capitalist demands a cut in your pension, because the Bolivian does not have a pension, which means that you are uncompetitive now, and your union leader, as you might remember, will come to convince you of the need to make concessions to that capitalist to keep your job, even though the only reason that the Bolivian does not have a pension is because the capitalist is ruthless greedy prick and refuses to give that Bolivian a pension, preferring to use brutal oppression and exploitation on that Bolivian instead, and nevertheless, even though your union leader must have a brain and thus knows this simple fact, nevertheless your union leader will convince you that this must be done due to what they call ‘the new economic reality' and ‘global competitiveness' and other important sounding jargon they toss around, since apparently they think you, the worker, are such a moron you won't figure things out. Your union leader, as you recall, will go along with all this ruthless prick conduct, since apparently your union leader is some kind of first class asshole and a reactionary to boot. You will be talked out the revolution and offered a bribe instead, thus meaning you can look forward to more life under ruthless pricks perched up on some manure pile, and if you are wondering why the world isn't paradise and neither is your life, well there is your answer right there.

Yes, that union leader will offer that worker this brand new fridge, if that worker will just agree to go along with the evil oppression and let the war criminals walk. At the same time that union leader will be chaining that worker to a system that is an historical dead end, for you see robots do not buy products, and as half a million workers have already discovered this year, people who lose their jobs to robots do not buy products either, and sooner or later a capitalist cannot sell products, leading to another one of those great depressions, which are a chronic feature of capitalism, the one that occurred in 1870 lasting for twenty terrible years, during which workers endured all the poverty and desperation while capitalists sat on their big stack of money and used severe oppression and cops shooting workers and such tactics to keep that stack safe until it was all over and they could start ruining the country again.

Which explains Hitlerism, since fascism is just, as Mussolini stated, the fusion of the capitalist corporation and the state, taking that whole ‘boss' idea into politics as well as the work place, a development which seems natural to an arrogant prick like that capitalist, which is why they are always launching relentless class warfare attacks on workers and destroying democracy and civil rights, even if they have to pay Osama Bin Laden a big pile of money to pick up the pace a little and get something going for a change.

Now given that capitalism is a manure pile, and thus attracts flies, and given that a union leader is obviously one of those flies, as their deeds and conduct indicate, it is no surprise that a union leader would become a counter revolutionary and offer a bribe of some sort to protect that manure pile. And so therefore, I thought it might be good to start bribing people myself.

Now in the most general terms what I envision is not state ownership of property, for that is another form of elitism, and being a manure pile, it is not surprising that you find someone like Stalin heading straight to that manure pile, and as you can tell from every ‘communist' state in history, they were all dictatorships for the simple reason that they all contained that manure pile, and thus attracted those really bad flies.

A much better concept would be the idea of a worker owned cooperative system, whereby a worker is an owner and owns a ‘share' in the company for as long as a worker is working at a company. Furthermore, we should also think of a giant cooperative movement, so that workers who work at really rich jobs like an oil field do not become so much richer than everyone else that before long they begin plotting class warfare attacks on everyone else. As more and more robots take over, which is an inevitable historical development, it logically follows that workers would be working less and less, which is good, since the goal of human life should not be being a worker but being a human being. You can compare this with being a worker replaced by a robot under those capitalists, which would then be a worker out pan handling, since capitalists, as you know, also insist on ‘ending welfare as we know it', capitalists being really cheap pricks, as being demonstrated by how they refused to give Africa any debt relief during that big scam that just took place, even though Africa is starving to death in a famine after last years plague of locusts.

So then I will leave it to your union leader to top my offer, perhaps by throwing in a wide screen television as well as that refigerator to get to let the crooks go free and save a failing system, thus bringing ruinous destruction down on your own head in the future, since you missed the chance for a revolution, and saved that system instead, and thus went along for the ride as it collapsed under its own ridiculous contradictions.

The aircraft carrier - an argument in favor of anarchism

Previously I compared elitism to a manure pile. It could also be compared to an aircraft carrier. Now as you know, an aircraft carrier is a platform for launching attacks. In a similar way, the elitist system is a platform from which imperialistic elitists launch endless rounds of class warfare attacks, of which Hitlerism and International War Crimes and wide spread lawlessness is just the latest stage in an endless series of class warfare attacks launched against humanity from above beginning right from the day FDR saved the capitalist butt, not that the capitalist was grateful, since that cost money, and if there is one thing a capitalist hates it is parting with a nickel.

The bombers launched from that aircraft carrier escalated in intensity under that great class warrior and unpunished war criminal, Ronald Reagan and his partner in crime, Maggie Thatcher. Reagan's hatred of taxes led him to slash taxes for the capitalists in order to ‘starve the beast' by deliberately plunging the nation in debt, which is where Bush got the idea from. This was in addition to all the program attacks launched by Reagan, except for the military, which he engorged, under the policy of the capitalists, which can be summarized as ‘Bombs not Food', as you can tell by the bombing and robbery or Iraq as contrasted to the starving to death of Africa during this hidden, secretive famine going on at the same time as Live 8 and the G8, this concert not being about a famine this time, but rather about a phony debt relief deal, since a famine would have cost that capitalist real money instead of not costing a dime. (Africa only got a promise of debt relief in 2010, while the so called ‘debt relief' was moved over from the Aid budget, which means that Africa also got deducted on the Welfare cheque, typical behavior for a demented ruthless prick like that morally twisted capitalist).

As any student of history would know, elitists have used that aircraft carrier to launch destructive attacks on humanity all throughout history, and will continue to do so as long as the platform is allowed to continue to exist. The problems are systemic, and the intelligent choice is not to solve them with fly swatters or by promising to post guards, which are indications that you know you have a problem, but rather you get rid of the problem itself, which makes more sense.

FDR, our hero

Just one more grenade tossed at the progressive movement, before I quit...

Don't think the spotted owl would like to thank our great hero, FDR, for saving the day for those capitalists by hijacking the last revolution.

And I am sure the Bolivians would like to erect a statue in honor of our hero, FDR, after their revolution goes through, to express their gratitude for over sixty years of brutal oppression and constant robbery and torture and murder.

You would think that the massacres and the tortures of the poor and the weak and the helpless and the terrible thefts done against them might have worried a man of deep conscience, such as FDR, our hero, but apparently it didn't worry him enough to get him out of the way so that humanity could leave free of evil oppression and destruction and horror.

Yes, I am sure their will be statues erected in honor of FDR and other great heroes of the American progressive movement erected all over the third world, by the time this is all over.

A Unified Field Theory

The Unified Field Theory
is also available as a zip file -> unified.zip

Introduction :The Pioneer Effect and the New Physics. A brief description of the new physics required to explain the 'Pioneer Effect', which is the constant deceleration of space craft as they fly through space.

Principles of Evolution: A Study in the Evolution of Bedbugs